Cargando…
Comparison between sustained low-efficiencydialysis (SLED) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in patients of septic shock: a randomized controlled trial
Autores principales: | Mishra, SB, Azim, A, Baronia, AK, Singh, RK, Gurjar, M, Poddar, B |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4796304/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2197-425X-3-S1-A55 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Sustained low-efficiency dialysis in septic shock: Hemodynamic tolerability and efficacy
por: Mishra, Shakti Bedanta, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Arterial site selection for measurement of mean arterial pressure in septic shock patients on high-dose norepinephrine
por: Bhaskar, Bhanuprakash, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Good-bye CRRT, here comes SLED? ... not so fast!
por: Joannidis, Michael
Publicado: (2012) -
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Comparison between Extended Daily Hemodialysis and Continuous Veno-venous Hemodialysis in Patients of Acute Kidney Injury with Septic Shock
por: Mishra, Shakti Bedanta, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Right heart in septic shock: prospective observational study
por: Singh, Ratender Kumar, et al.
Publicado: (2016)