Cargando…

Comparison of DMSA Scan 99 m and EC Scan 99 m in Diagnosis of Cortical Defect and Differential Renal Function

INTRODUCTION: Diagnosis of renal cortical lesions by radioisotopes in nuclear medicine is one of the most common techniques and procedures can be performed by different radiotracer. However, all these materials are accurate in determining kidney function, but there are differences between them in th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohammadi-Fallah, M., Alizadeh, M., Lavin, T. Ahmadi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Canadian Center of Science and Education 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4796348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25363177
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v6n7p38
_version_ 1782421758164336640
author Mohammadi-Fallah, M.
Alizadeh, M.
Lavin, T. Ahmadi
author_facet Mohammadi-Fallah, M.
Alizadeh, M.
Lavin, T. Ahmadi
author_sort Mohammadi-Fallah, M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Diagnosis of renal cortical lesions by radioisotopes in nuclear medicine is one of the most common techniques and procedures can be performed by different radiotracer. However, all these materials are accurate in determining kidney function, but there are differences between them in the field. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of EC scans compared with DMSA scan in the detection of cortical lesions and DRF. METHODS: 65 cases, which have been referred for various reasons, for DMSA scans were enrolled. Patients 1 week after DMSA scan with the previous consent of the EC being scanned. The results were compared in terms of convergence as well as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of EC with respect to the results of DMSA scan. RESULTS: PPV of EC was 100%, negative predictive value of EC was 68.75%, sensitivity of EC was 90.74% and specificity of EC was 100% in the detection of cortical lesions. DMSA scan and EC convergence rates result in cortical lesions in our study was high. DISCUSSION: We suggest EC scan as an alternative to reduce the cost of therapy and radiation, but considering the benefits of DMSA scan, it could remain the gold standard method of diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4796348
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Canadian Center of Science and Education
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47963482016-04-21 Comparison of DMSA Scan 99 m and EC Scan 99 m in Diagnosis of Cortical Defect and Differential Renal Function Mohammadi-Fallah, M. Alizadeh, M. Lavin, T. Ahmadi Glob J Health Sci Articles INTRODUCTION: Diagnosis of renal cortical lesions by radioisotopes in nuclear medicine is one of the most common techniques and procedures can be performed by different radiotracer. However, all these materials are accurate in determining kidney function, but there are differences between them in the field. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of EC scans compared with DMSA scan in the detection of cortical lesions and DRF. METHODS: 65 cases, which have been referred for various reasons, for DMSA scans were enrolled. Patients 1 week after DMSA scan with the previous consent of the EC being scanned. The results were compared in terms of convergence as well as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of EC with respect to the results of DMSA scan. RESULTS: PPV of EC was 100%, negative predictive value of EC was 68.75%, sensitivity of EC was 90.74% and specificity of EC was 100% in the detection of cortical lesions. DMSA scan and EC convergence rates result in cortical lesions in our study was high. DISCUSSION: We suggest EC scan as an alternative to reduce the cost of therapy and radiation, but considering the benefits of DMSA scan, it could remain the gold standard method of diagnosis. Canadian Center of Science and Education 2014-12 2014-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4796348/ /pubmed/25363177 http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v6n7p38 Text en Copyright: © Canadian Center of Science and Education http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Mohammadi-Fallah, M.
Alizadeh, M.
Lavin, T. Ahmadi
Comparison of DMSA Scan 99 m and EC Scan 99 m in Diagnosis of Cortical Defect and Differential Renal Function
title Comparison of DMSA Scan 99 m and EC Scan 99 m in Diagnosis of Cortical Defect and Differential Renal Function
title_full Comparison of DMSA Scan 99 m and EC Scan 99 m in Diagnosis of Cortical Defect and Differential Renal Function
title_fullStr Comparison of DMSA Scan 99 m and EC Scan 99 m in Diagnosis of Cortical Defect and Differential Renal Function
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of DMSA Scan 99 m and EC Scan 99 m in Diagnosis of Cortical Defect and Differential Renal Function
title_short Comparison of DMSA Scan 99 m and EC Scan 99 m in Diagnosis of Cortical Defect and Differential Renal Function
title_sort comparison of dmsa scan 99 m and ec scan 99 m in diagnosis of cortical defect and differential renal function
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4796348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25363177
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v6n7p38
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadifallahm comparisonofdmsascan99mandecscan99mindiagnosisofcorticaldefectanddifferentialrenalfunction
AT alizadehm comparisonofdmsascan99mandecscan99mindiagnosisofcorticaldefectanddifferentialrenalfunction
AT lavintahmadi comparisonofdmsascan99mandecscan99mindiagnosisofcorticaldefectanddifferentialrenalfunction