Cargando…

Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Avonex and CinnoVex in Relapsing Remitting MS

INTRODUCTION: Multiple sclerosis is a chronic and degenerative neurological disease characterized by loss of myelin sheath of some neurons in brain and spinal cord. It is associated with high economic burden due to premature deaths and high occurrence of disabilities. The aim of the current study wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Najafi, Behzad, Ghaderi, Hossein, Jafari, Mehdi, Najafi, Smaeil, Kiadaliri, Aliasghar Ahmad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Canadian Center of Science and Education 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4796503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25716386
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v7n2p139
_version_ 1782421790465720320
author Najafi, Behzad
Ghaderi, Hossein
Jafari, Mehdi
Najafi, Smaeil
Kiadaliri, Aliasghar Ahmad
author_facet Najafi, Behzad
Ghaderi, Hossein
Jafari, Mehdi
Najafi, Smaeil
Kiadaliri, Aliasghar Ahmad
author_sort Najafi, Behzad
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Multiple sclerosis is a chronic and degenerative neurological disease characterized by loss of myelin sheath of some neurons in brain and spinal cord. It is associated with high economic burden due to premature deaths and high occurrence of disabilities. The aim of the current study was to determine cost effectiveness of two major products of interferon 1a in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Altogether, 140 patients who have consumed Avonex and CinnoVex in Relapsing Remitting MS for at least two years were randomly selected (70 patients in each group). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using the adopted MSQoL-54 instrument. Costs were measured and valued from Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MOHME) perspective. Two-way sensitivity analysis was used to check robustness of the results. RESULTS: Patients in CinnoVex group reported significantly higher scores in both physical (69.5 vs. 50.9, P<0.001) and mental (63.3 vs. 56.6, P=0.03) aspects of HRQoL than Avonex group. On the other hand, annual cost of CinnoVex and Avonex were 2410 US$ and 4515US$ per patient, respectively (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that CinnoVex was dominant option over the study period. It is suggested that results of the current study should be considered in allocating resources to MS treatments in Iran. Of course, our findings should be interpreted with caution duo to short term horizon and lack of HRQoL scores at baseline (before the intervention).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4796503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Canadian Center of Science and Education
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47965032016-04-21 Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Avonex and CinnoVex in Relapsing Remitting MS Najafi, Behzad Ghaderi, Hossein Jafari, Mehdi Najafi, Smaeil Kiadaliri, Aliasghar Ahmad Glob J Health Sci Articles INTRODUCTION: Multiple sclerosis is a chronic and degenerative neurological disease characterized by loss of myelin sheath of some neurons in brain and spinal cord. It is associated with high economic burden due to premature deaths and high occurrence of disabilities. The aim of the current study was to determine cost effectiveness of two major products of interferon 1a in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Altogether, 140 patients who have consumed Avonex and CinnoVex in Relapsing Remitting MS for at least two years were randomly selected (70 patients in each group). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using the adopted MSQoL-54 instrument. Costs were measured and valued from Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MOHME) perspective. Two-way sensitivity analysis was used to check robustness of the results. RESULTS: Patients in CinnoVex group reported significantly higher scores in both physical (69.5 vs. 50.9, P<0.001) and mental (63.3 vs. 56.6, P=0.03) aspects of HRQoL than Avonex group. On the other hand, annual cost of CinnoVex and Avonex were 2410 US$ and 4515US$ per patient, respectively (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that CinnoVex was dominant option over the study period. It is suggested that results of the current study should be considered in allocating resources to MS treatments in Iran. Of course, our findings should be interpreted with caution duo to short term horizon and lack of HRQoL scores at baseline (before the intervention). Canadian Center of Science and Education 2015-03 2014-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4796503/ /pubmed/25716386 http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v7n2p139 Text en Copyright: © Canadian Center of Science and Education http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Najafi, Behzad
Ghaderi, Hossein
Jafari, Mehdi
Najafi, Smaeil
Kiadaliri, Aliasghar Ahmad
Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Avonex and CinnoVex in Relapsing Remitting MS
title Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Avonex and CinnoVex in Relapsing Remitting MS
title_full Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Avonex and CinnoVex in Relapsing Remitting MS
title_fullStr Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Avonex and CinnoVex in Relapsing Remitting MS
title_full_unstemmed Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Avonex and CinnoVex in Relapsing Remitting MS
title_short Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Avonex and CinnoVex in Relapsing Remitting MS
title_sort cost effectiveness analysis of avonex and cinnovex in relapsing remitting ms
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4796503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25716386
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v7n2p139
work_keys_str_mv AT najafibehzad costeffectivenessanalysisofavonexandcinnovexinrelapsingremittingms
AT ghaderihossein costeffectivenessanalysisofavonexandcinnovexinrelapsingremittingms
AT jafarimehdi costeffectivenessanalysisofavonexandcinnovexinrelapsingremittingms
AT najafismaeil costeffectivenessanalysisofavonexandcinnovexinrelapsingremittingms
AT kiadalirialiasgharahmad costeffectivenessanalysisofavonexandcinnovexinrelapsingremittingms