Cargando…
Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Avonex and CinnoVex in Relapsing Remitting MS
INTRODUCTION: Multiple sclerosis is a chronic and degenerative neurological disease characterized by loss of myelin sheath of some neurons in brain and spinal cord. It is associated with high economic burden due to premature deaths and high occurrence of disabilities. The aim of the current study wa...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Canadian Center of Science and Education
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4796503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25716386 http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v7n2p139 |
_version_ | 1782421790465720320 |
---|---|
author | Najafi, Behzad Ghaderi, Hossein Jafari, Mehdi Najafi, Smaeil Kiadaliri, Aliasghar Ahmad |
author_facet | Najafi, Behzad Ghaderi, Hossein Jafari, Mehdi Najafi, Smaeil Kiadaliri, Aliasghar Ahmad |
author_sort | Najafi, Behzad |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Multiple sclerosis is a chronic and degenerative neurological disease characterized by loss of myelin sheath of some neurons in brain and spinal cord. It is associated with high economic burden due to premature deaths and high occurrence of disabilities. The aim of the current study was to determine cost effectiveness of two major products of interferon 1a in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Altogether, 140 patients who have consumed Avonex and CinnoVex in Relapsing Remitting MS for at least two years were randomly selected (70 patients in each group). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using the adopted MSQoL-54 instrument. Costs were measured and valued from Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MOHME) perspective. Two-way sensitivity analysis was used to check robustness of the results. RESULTS: Patients in CinnoVex group reported significantly higher scores in both physical (69.5 vs. 50.9, P<0.001) and mental (63.3 vs. 56.6, P=0.03) aspects of HRQoL than Avonex group. On the other hand, annual cost of CinnoVex and Avonex were 2410 US$ and 4515US$ per patient, respectively (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that CinnoVex was dominant option over the study period. It is suggested that results of the current study should be considered in allocating resources to MS treatments in Iran. Of course, our findings should be interpreted with caution duo to short term horizon and lack of HRQoL scores at baseline (before the intervention). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4796503 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Canadian Center of Science and Education |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47965032016-04-21 Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Avonex and CinnoVex in Relapsing Remitting MS Najafi, Behzad Ghaderi, Hossein Jafari, Mehdi Najafi, Smaeil Kiadaliri, Aliasghar Ahmad Glob J Health Sci Articles INTRODUCTION: Multiple sclerosis is a chronic and degenerative neurological disease characterized by loss of myelin sheath of some neurons in brain and spinal cord. It is associated with high economic burden due to premature deaths and high occurrence of disabilities. The aim of the current study was to determine cost effectiveness of two major products of interferon 1a in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Altogether, 140 patients who have consumed Avonex and CinnoVex in Relapsing Remitting MS for at least two years were randomly selected (70 patients in each group). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using the adopted MSQoL-54 instrument. Costs were measured and valued from Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MOHME) perspective. Two-way sensitivity analysis was used to check robustness of the results. RESULTS: Patients in CinnoVex group reported significantly higher scores in both physical (69.5 vs. 50.9, P<0.001) and mental (63.3 vs. 56.6, P=0.03) aspects of HRQoL than Avonex group. On the other hand, annual cost of CinnoVex and Avonex were 2410 US$ and 4515US$ per patient, respectively (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that CinnoVex was dominant option over the study period. It is suggested that results of the current study should be considered in allocating resources to MS treatments in Iran. Of course, our findings should be interpreted with caution duo to short term horizon and lack of HRQoL scores at baseline (before the intervention). Canadian Center of Science and Education 2015-03 2014-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4796503/ /pubmed/25716386 http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v7n2p139 Text en Copyright: © Canadian Center of Science and Education http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Articles Najafi, Behzad Ghaderi, Hossein Jafari, Mehdi Najafi, Smaeil Kiadaliri, Aliasghar Ahmad Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Avonex and CinnoVex in Relapsing Remitting MS |
title | Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Avonex and CinnoVex in Relapsing Remitting MS |
title_full | Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Avonex and CinnoVex in Relapsing Remitting MS |
title_fullStr | Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Avonex and CinnoVex in Relapsing Remitting MS |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Avonex and CinnoVex in Relapsing Remitting MS |
title_short | Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Avonex and CinnoVex in Relapsing Remitting MS |
title_sort | cost effectiveness analysis of avonex and cinnovex in relapsing remitting ms |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4796503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25716386 http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v7n2p139 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT najafibehzad costeffectivenessanalysisofavonexandcinnovexinrelapsingremittingms AT ghaderihossein costeffectivenessanalysisofavonexandcinnovexinrelapsingremittingms AT jafarimehdi costeffectivenessanalysisofavonexandcinnovexinrelapsingremittingms AT najafismaeil costeffectivenessanalysisofavonexandcinnovexinrelapsingremittingms AT kiadalirialiasgharahmad costeffectivenessanalysisofavonexandcinnovexinrelapsingremittingms |