Cargando…
Metal–Metal Bonding in Uranium–Group 10 Complexes
[Image: see text] Heterobimetallic complexes containing short uranium–group 10 metal bonds have been prepared from monometallic IU(IV)(OAr(P)-κ(2)O,P)(3) (2) {[Ar(P)O](−) = 2-tert-butyl-4-methyl-6-(diphenylphosphino)phenolate}. The U–M bond in IU(IV)(μ-OAr(P)-1κ(1)O,2κ(1)P)(3)M(0), M = Ni (3–Ni), Pd...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical
Society
2016
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4796865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26942560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b10698 |
_version_ | 1782421848976261120 |
---|---|
author | Hlina, Johann A. Pankhurst, James R. Kaltsoyannis, Nikolas Arnold, Polly L. |
author_facet | Hlina, Johann A. Pankhurst, James R. Kaltsoyannis, Nikolas Arnold, Polly L. |
author_sort | Hlina, Johann A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Heterobimetallic complexes containing short uranium–group 10 metal bonds have been prepared from monometallic IU(IV)(OAr(P)-κ(2)O,P)(3) (2) {[Ar(P)O](−) = 2-tert-butyl-4-methyl-6-(diphenylphosphino)phenolate}. The U–M bond in IU(IV)(μ-OAr(P)-1κ(1)O,2κ(1)P)(3)M(0), M = Ni (3–Ni), Pd (3–Pd), and Pt (3–Pt), has been investigated by experimental and DFT computational methods. Comparisons of 3–Ni with two further U–Ni complexes XU(IV)(μ-OAr(P)-1κ(1)O,2κ(1)P)(3)Ni(0), X = Me(3)SiO (4) and F (5), was also possible via iodide substitution. All complexes were characterized by variable-temperature NMR spectroscopy, electrochemistry, and single crystal X-ray diffraction. The U–M bonds are significantly shorter than any other crystallographically characterized d–f-block bimetallic, even though the ligand flexes to allow a variable U–M separation. Excellent agreement is found between the experimental and computed structures for 3–Ni and 3–Pd. Natural population analysis and natural localized molecular orbital (NLMO) compositions indicate that U employs both 5f and 6d orbitals in covalent bonding to a significant extent. Quantum theory of atoms-in-molecules analysis reveals U–M bond critical point properties typical of metallic bonding and a larger delocalization index (bond order) for the less polar U–Ni bond than U–Pd. Electrochemical studies agree with the computational analyses and the X-ray structural data for the U–X adducts 3–Ni, 4, and 5. The data show a trend in uranium–metal bond strength that decreases from 3–Ni down to 3–Pt and suggest that exchanging the iodide for a fluoride strengthens the metal–metal bond. Despite short U–TM (transition metal) distances, four other computational approaches also suggest low U–TM bond orders, reflecting highly transition metal localized valence NLMOs. These are more so for 3–Pd than 3–Ni, consistent with slightly larger U–TM bond orders in the latter. Computational studies of the model systems (PH(3))(3)MU(OH)(3)I (M = Ni, Pd) reveal longer and weaker unsupported U–TM bonds vs 3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4796865 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | American Chemical
Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47968652016-03-21 Metal–Metal Bonding in Uranium–Group 10 Complexes Hlina, Johann A. Pankhurst, James R. Kaltsoyannis, Nikolas Arnold, Polly L. J Am Chem Soc [Image: see text] Heterobimetallic complexes containing short uranium–group 10 metal bonds have been prepared from monometallic IU(IV)(OAr(P)-κ(2)O,P)(3) (2) {[Ar(P)O](−) = 2-tert-butyl-4-methyl-6-(diphenylphosphino)phenolate}. The U–M bond in IU(IV)(μ-OAr(P)-1κ(1)O,2κ(1)P)(3)M(0), M = Ni (3–Ni), Pd (3–Pd), and Pt (3–Pt), has been investigated by experimental and DFT computational methods. Comparisons of 3–Ni with two further U–Ni complexes XU(IV)(μ-OAr(P)-1κ(1)O,2κ(1)P)(3)Ni(0), X = Me(3)SiO (4) and F (5), was also possible via iodide substitution. All complexes were characterized by variable-temperature NMR spectroscopy, electrochemistry, and single crystal X-ray diffraction. The U–M bonds are significantly shorter than any other crystallographically characterized d–f-block bimetallic, even though the ligand flexes to allow a variable U–M separation. Excellent agreement is found between the experimental and computed structures for 3–Ni and 3–Pd. Natural population analysis and natural localized molecular orbital (NLMO) compositions indicate that U employs both 5f and 6d orbitals in covalent bonding to a significant extent. Quantum theory of atoms-in-molecules analysis reveals U–M bond critical point properties typical of metallic bonding and a larger delocalization index (bond order) for the less polar U–Ni bond than U–Pd. Electrochemical studies agree with the computational analyses and the X-ray structural data for the U–X adducts 3–Ni, 4, and 5. The data show a trend in uranium–metal bond strength that decreases from 3–Ni down to 3–Pt and suggest that exchanging the iodide for a fluoride strengthens the metal–metal bond. Despite short U–TM (transition metal) distances, four other computational approaches also suggest low U–TM bond orders, reflecting highly transition metal localized valence NLMOs. These are more so for 3–Pd than 3–Ni, consistent with slightly larger U–TM bond orders in the latter. Computational studies of the model systems (PH(3))(3)MU(OH)(3)I (M = Ni, Pd) reveal longer and weaker unsupported U–TM bonds vs 3. American Chemical Society 2016-03-04 2016-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4796865/ /pubmed/26942560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b10698 Text en Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccby_termsofuse.html) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited. |
spellingShingle | Hlina, Johann A. Pankhurst, James R. Kaltsoyannis, Nikolas Arnold, Polly L. Metal–Metal Bonding in Uranium–Group 10 Complexes |
title | Metal–Metal Bonding in Uranium–Group
10 Complexes |
title_full | Metal–Metal Bonding in Uranium–Group
10 Complexes |
title_fullStr | Metal–Metal Bonding in Uranium–Group
10 Complexes |
title_full_unstemmed | Metal–Metal Bonding in Uranium–Group
10 Complexes |
title_short | Metal–Metal Bonding in Uranium–Group
10 Complexes |
title_sort | metal–metal bonding in uranium–group
10 complexes |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4796865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26942560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b10698 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hlinajohanna metalmetalbondinginuraniumgroup10complexes AT pankhurstjamesr metalmetalbondinginuraniumgroup10complexes AT kaltsoyannisnikolas metalmetalbondinginuraniumgroup10complexes AT arnoldpollyl metalmetalbondinginuraniumgroup10complexes |