Cargando…

Metal–Metal Bonding in Uranium–Group 10 Complexes

[Image: see text] Heterobimetallic complexes containing short uranium–group 10 metal bonds have been prepared from monometallic IU(IV)(OAr(P)-κ(2)O,P)(3) (2) {[Ar(P)O](−) = 2-tert-butyl-4-methyl-6-(diphenylphosphino)phenolate}. The U–M bond in IU(IV)(μ-OAr(P)-1κ(1)O,2κ(1)P)(3)M(0), M = Ni (3–Ni), Pd...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hlina, Johann A., Pankhurst, James R., Kaltsoyannis, Nikolas, Arnold, Polly L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2016
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4796865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26942560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b10698
_version_ 1782421848976261120
author Hlina, Johann A.
Pankhurst, James R.
Kaltsoyannis, Nikolas
Arnold, Polly L.
author_facet Hlina, Johann A.
Pankhurst, James R.
Kaltsoyannis, Nikolas
Arnold, Polly L.
author_sort Hlina, Johann A.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Heterobimetallic complexes containing short uranium–group 10 metal bonds have been prepared from monometallic IU(IV)(OAr(P)-κ(2)O,P)(3) (2) {[Ar(P)O](−) = 2-tert-butyl-4-methyl-6-(diphenylphosphino)phenolate}. The U–M bond in IU(IV)(μ-OAr(P)-1κ(1)O,2κ(1)P)(3)M(0), M = Ni (3–Ni), Pd (3–Pd), and Pt (3–Pt), has been investigated by experimental and DFT computational methods. Comparisons of 3–Ni with two further U–Ni complexes XU(IV)(μ-OAr(P)-1κ(1)O,2κ(1)P)(3)Ni(0), X = Me(3)SiO (4) and F (5), was also possible via iodide substitution. All complexes were characterized by variable-temperature NMR spectroscopy, electrochemistry, and single crystal X-ray diffraction. The U–M bonds are significantly shorter than any other crystallographically characterized d–f-block bimetallic, even though the ligand flexes to allow a variable U–M separation. Excellent agreement is found between the experimental and computed structures for 3–Ni and 3–Pd. Natural population analysis and natural localized molecular orbital (NLMO) compositions indicate that U employs both 5f and 6d orbitals in covalent bonding to a significant extent. Quantum theory of atoms-in-molecules analysis reveals U–M bond critical point properties typical of metallic bonding and a larger delocalization index (bond order) for the less polar U–Ni bond than U–Pd. Electrochemical studies agree with the computational analyses and the X-ray structural data for the U–X adducts 3–Ni, 4, and 5. The data show a trend in uranium–metal bond strength that decreases from 3–Ni down to 3–Pt and suggest that exchanging the iodide for a fluoride strengthens the metal–metal bond. Despite short U–TM (transition metal) distances, four other computational approaches also suggest low U–TM bond orders, reflecting highly transition metal localized valence NLMOs. These are more so for 3–Pd than 3–Ni, consistent with slightly larger U–TM bond orders in the latter. Computational studies of the model systems (PH(3))(3)MU(OH)(3)I (M = Ni, Pd) reveal longer and weaker unsupported U–TM bonds vs 3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4796865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47968652016-03-21 Metal–Metal Bonding in Uranium–Group 10 Complexes Hlina, Johann A. Pankhurst, James R. Kaltsoyannis, Nikolas Arnold, Polly L. J Am Chem Soc [Image: see text] Heterobimetallic complexes containing short uranium–group 10 metal bonds have been prepared from monometallic IU(IV)(OAr(P)-κ(2)O,P)(3) (2) {[Ar(P)O](−) = 2-tert-butyl-4-methyl-6-(diphenylphosphino)phenolate}. The U–M bond in IU(IV)(μ-OAr(P)-1κ(1)O,2κ(1)P)(3)M(0), M = Ni (3–Ni), Pd (3–Pd), and Pt (3–Pt), has been investigated by experimental and DFT computational methods. Comparisons of 3–Ni with two further U–Ni complexes XU(IV)(μ-OAr(P)-1κ(1)O,2κ(1)P)(3)Ni(0), X = Me(3)SiO (4) and F (5), was also possible via iodide substitution. All complexes were characterized by variable-temperature NMR spectroscopy, electrochemistry, and single crystal X-ray diffraction. The U–M bonds are significantly shorter than any other crystallographically characterized d–f-block bimetallic, even though the ligand flexes to allow a variable U–M separation. Excellent agreement is found between the experimental and computed structures for 3–Ni and 3–Pd. Natural population analysis and natural localized molecular orbital (NLMO) compositions indicate that U employs both 5f and 6d orbitals in covalent bonding to a significant extent. Quantum theory of atoms-in-molecules analysis reveals U–M bond critical point properties typical of metallic bonding and a larger delocalization index (bond order) for the less polar U–Ni bond than U–Pd. Electrochemical studies agree with the computational analyses and the X-ray structural data for the U–X adducts 3–Ni, 4, and 5. The data show a trend in uranium–metal bond strength that decreases from 3–Ni down to 3–Pt and suggest that exchanging the iodide for a fluoride strengthens the metal–metal bond. Despite short U–TM (transition metal) distances, four other computational approaches also suggest low U–TM bond orders, reflecting highly transition metal localized valence NLMOs. These are more so for 3–Pd than 3–Ni, consistent with slightly larger U–TM bond orders in the latter. Computational studies of the model systems (PH(3))(3)MU(OH)(3)I (M = Ni, Pd) reveal longer and weaker unsupported U–TM bonds vs 3. American Chemical Society 2016-03-04 2016-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4796865/ /pubmed/26942560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b10698 Text en Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccby_termsofuse.html) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited.
spellingShingle Hlina, Johann A.
Pankhurst, James R.
Kaltsoyannis, Nikolas
Arnold, Polly L.
Metal–Metal Bonding in Uranium–Group 10 Complexes
title Metal–Metal Bonding in Uranium–Group 10 Complexes
title_full Metal–Metal Bonding in Uranium–Group 10 Complexes
title_fullStr Metal–Metal Bonding in Uranium–Group 10 Complexes
title_full_unstemmed Metal–Metal Bonding in Uranium–Group 10 Complexes
title_short Metal–Metal Bonding in Uranium–Group 10 Complexes
title_sort metal–metal bonding in uranium–group 10 complexes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4796865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26942560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b10698
work_keys_str_mv AT hlinajohanna metalmetalbondinginuraniumgroup10complexes
AT pankhurstjamesr metalmetalbondinginuraniumgroup10complexes
AT kaltsoyannisnikolas metalmetalbondinginuraniumgroup10complexes
AT arnoldpollyl metalmetalbondinginuraniumgroup10complexes