Cargando…

Biomechanical evaluation of monosegmental pedicle instrumentation in a calf spine model and the role of fractured vertebrae in screw stability

BACKGROUND: Monsegmental pedicle instrumentation (MSPI) has been used to treat thoracolumbar fractures. However, there are few reports about the biomechanical characteristics of MSPI compared with traditional short-segment pedicle instrumentation (SSPI) in management of unstable thoracolumbar fractu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Fuxin, Zhou, Zhiyu, Wang, Le, Liu, Shaoyu, Zhong, Rui, Liu, Xizhe, Cui, Shangbin, Pan, Ximin, Gao, Manman, Zhao, Yajing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4797180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26993472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0677-9
_version_ 1782421904092561408
author Wei, Fuxin
Zhou, Zhiyu
Wang, Le
Liu, Shaoyu
Zhong, Rui
Liu, Xizhe
Cui, Shangbin
Pan, Ximin
Gao, Manman
Zhao, Yajing
author_facet Wei, Fuxin
Zhou, Zhiyu
Wang, Le
Liu, Shaoyu
Zhong, Rui
Liu, Xizhe
Cui, Shangbin
Pan, Ximin
Gao, Manman
Zhao, Yajing
author_sort Wei, Fuxin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Monsegmental pedicle instrumentation (MSPI) has been used to treat thoracolumbar fractures. However, there are few reports about the biomechanical characteristics of MSPI compared with traditional short-segment pedicle instrumentation (SSPI) in management of unstable thoracolumbar fractures, and the influence of vertebral fracture on screw stability is still unclear. METHODS: This study was to compare the immediate stability between MSPI and SSPI in management of unstable L1 fracture, and to evaluate the role of fractured vertebrae in screw stability. Two studies were performed: in the first study, sixteen fresh calf spines (T11-L3) were divided into two groups, in which unstable fractures at L1 were produced and then instrumented with MSPI or SSPI respectively. The range of motion (ROM) and lax zone (LZ) of specimens were evaluated with pure moment of 6 Nm loaded. The second study measured and compared the pullout strength of screws inserted in to 16 intact and fractured vertebrae of calf spines (L1-3) respectively. The correlation of pullout strength with load sharing classification (LSC) of fractured vertebrae was analyzed. RESULTS: No significant difference in the ROM and LZ of the destabilized segments after fixation between MSPI and SSPI, except in axial rotation of ROM (P < 0.05). After fatigue cyclic loading, the MSPI showed a significant increase of ROM during lateral bending and axial rotation (P < 0.05); however, there were no significant differences in the LZ during all loading models between groups (P > 0.05). The mean pullout strength of pedicle screws in fractured vertebrae decreased by 13.7 %, compared with that of intact vertebrae (P > 0.05), and had a low correlation with LSC of the fractured vertebrae (r = 0.293, P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MSPI can provide effective immediate stability for management of unstable thoracolumbar fractures; however, it has less fatigue resistance during lateral bending and axial rotation compared with SSPI. LSC score of fractured vertebrae is not a major influence on the pullout strength of screws.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4797180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47971802016-03-18 Biomechanical evaluation of monosegmental pedicle instrumentation in a calf spine model and the role of fractured vertebrae in screw stability Wei, Fuxin Zhou, Zhiyu Wang, Le Liu, Shaoyu Zhong, Rui Liu, Xizhe Cui, Shangbin Pan, Ximin Gao, Manman Zhao, Yajing BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Monsegmental pedicle instrumentation (MSPI) has been used to treat thoracolumbar fractures. However, there are few reports about the biomechanical characteristics of MSPI compared with traditional short-segment pedicle instrumentation (SSPI) in management of unstable thoracolumbar fractures, and the influence of vertebral fracture on screw stability is still unclear. METHODS: This study was to compare the immediate stability between MSPI and SSPI in management of unstable L1 fracture, and to evaluate the role of fractured vertebrae in screw stability. Two studies were performed: in the first study, sixteen fresh calf spines (T11-L3) were divided into two groups, in which unstable fractures at L1 were produced and then instrumented with MSPI or SSPI respectively. The range of motion (ROM) and lax zone (LZ) of specimens were evaluated with pure moment of 6 Nm loaded. The second study measured and compared the pullout strength of screws inserted in to 16 intact and fractured vertebrae of calf spines (L1-3) respectively. The correlation of pullout strength with load sharing classification (LSC) of fractured vertebrae was analyzed. RESULTS: No significant difference in the ROM and LZ of the destabilized segments after fixation between MSPI and SSPI, except in axial rotation of ROM (P < 0.05). After fatigue cyclic loading, the MSPI showed a significant increase of ROM during lateral bending and axial rotation (P < 0.05); however, there were no significant differences in the LZ during all loading models between groups (P > 0.05). The mean pullout strength of pedicle screws in fractured vertebrae decreased by 13.7 %, compared with that of intact vertebrae (P > 0.05), and had a low correlation with LSC of the fractured vertebrae (r = 0.293, P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MSPI can provide effective immediate stability for management of unstable thoracolumbar fractures; however, it has less fatigue resistance during lateral bending and axial rotation compared with SSPI. LSC score of fractured vertebrae is not a major influence on the pullout strength of screws. BioMed Central 2016-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4797180/ /pubmed/26993472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0677-9 Text en © Wei et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wei, Fuxin
Zhou, Zhiyu
Wang, Le
Liu, Shaoyu
Zhong, Rui
Liu, Xizhe
Cui, Shangbin
Pan, Ximin
Gao, Manman
Zhao, Yajing
Biomechanical evaluation of monosegmental pedicle instrumentation in a calf spine model and the role of fractured vertebrae in screw stability
title Biomechanical evaluation of monosegmental pedicle instrumentation in a calf spine model and the role of fractured vertebrae in screw stability
title_full Biomechanical evaluation of monosegmental pedicle instrumentation in a calf spine model and the role of fractured vertebrae in screw stability
title_fullStr Biomechanical evaluation of monosegmental pedicle instrumentation in a calf spine model and the role of fractured vertebrae in screw stability
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical evaluation of monosegmental pedicle instrumentation in a calf spine model and the role of fractured vertebrae in screw stability
title_short Biomechanical evaluation of monosegmental pedicle instrumentation in a calf spine model and the role of fractured vertebrae in screw stability
title_sort biomechanical evaluation of monosegmental pedicle instrumentation in a calf spine model and the role of fractured vertebrae in screw stability
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4797180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26993472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0677-9
work_keys_str_mv AT weifuxin biomechanicalevaluationofmonosegmentalpedicleinstrumentationinacalfspinemodelandtheroleoffracturedvertebraeinscrewstability
AT zhouzhiyu biomechanicalevaluationofmonosegmentalpedicleinstrumentationinacalfspinemodelandtheroleoffracturedvertebraeinscrewstability
AT wangle biomechanicalevaluationofmonosegmentalpedicleinstrumentationinacalfspinemodelandtheroleoffracturedvertebraeinscrewstability
AT liushaoyu biomechanicalevaluationofmonosegmentalpedicleinstrumentationinacalfspinemodelandtheroleoffracturedvertebraeinscrewstability
AT zhongrui biomechanicalevaluationofmonosegmentalpedicleinstrumentationinacalfspinemodelandtheroleoffracturedvertebraeinscrewstability
AT liuxizhe biomechanicalevaluationofmonosegmentalpedicleinstrumentationinacalfspinemodelandtheroleoffracturedvertebraeinscrewstability
AT cuishangbin biomechanicalevaluationofmonosegmentalpedicleinstrumentationinacalfspinemodelandtheroleoffracturedvertebraeinscrewstability
AT panximin biomechanicalevaluationofmonosegmentalpedicleinstrumentationinacalfspinemodelandtheroleoffracturedvertebraeinscrewstability
AT gaomanman biomechanicalevaluationofmonosegmentalpedicleinstrumentationinacalfspinemodelandtheroleoffracturedvertebraeinscrewstability
AT zhaoyajing biomechanicalevaluationofmonosegmentalpedicleinstrumentationinacalfspinemodelandtheroleoffracturedvertebraeinscrewstability