Cargando…

Intraoperative 3D imaging in the treatment of elbow fractures - a retrospective analysis of indications, intraoperative revision rates, and implications in 36 cases

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) imaging with a mobile C-arm has proven to be a valuable intraoperative tool in trauma surgery. However, little data is available concerning its use in the treatment of elbow fractures. The aim of the current study was to determine the intraoperative findings and co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schnetzke, Marc, Fuchs, Julia, Vetter, Sven Y., Beisemann, Nils, Keil, Holger, Grützner, Paul-Alfred, Franke, Jochen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4797343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26987661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-016-0126-z
_version_ 1782421938211127296
author Schnetzke, Marc
Fuchs, Julia
Vetter, Sven Y.
Beisemann, Nils
Keil, Holger
Grützner, Paul-Alfred
Franke, Jochen
author_facet Schnetzke, Marc
Fuchs, Julia
Vetter, Sven Y.
Beisemann, Nils
Keil, Holger
Grützner, Paul-Alfred
Franke, Jochen
author_sort Schnetzke, Marc
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) imaging with a mobile C-arm has proven to be a valuable intraoperative tool in trauma surgery. However, little data is available concerning its use in the treatment of elbow fractures. The aim of the current study was to determine the intraoperative findings and consequences of 3D imaging in the treatment of elbow fractures. METHODS: Between 2001 and 2015, prospectively collected data of 36 patients who underwent intraoperative 3D imaging during elbow surgery were recorded. The findings and consequences of the intraoperative 3D scans were analyzed in a retrospective chart review. For clinical evaluation the analysis included the patients’ medical history, the injury pattern of the affected elbow and concomitant injuries. Intraoperative and postoperative complications and revision surgeries were evaluated as well. RESULTS: In 6 patients (16.7 %) analysis of the intraoperative 3D scan led to an immediate revision due to the detection of intra-articular screw placement (n = 3, 8.3 %) and remaining intra-articular step of >2 mm (n = 3, 8.3 %). In all of these patients, correct implant positioning and anatomical reduction could be achieved after immediate intraoperative revision, which was verified by a repeated intraoperative 3D scan. None of the 36 patients needed surgical revision based on postoperative radiological examinations due to secondary dislocation, wrong implant placement or remaining steps in the articular surface. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative 3D imaging offers additional information about fracture reduction and implant positioning in the treatment of elbow fractures compared to conventional intraoperative 2D imaging. It may therefore reduce the need for revision surgery. The value of intraoperative 3D imaging for clinical outcomes still needs to be assessed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4797343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47973432016-03-19 Intraoperative 3D imaging in the treatment of elbow fractures - a retrospective analysis of indications, intraoperative revision rates, and implications in 36 cases Schnetzke, Marc Fuchs, Julia Vetter, Sven Y. Beisemann, Nils Keil, Holger Grützner, Paul-Alfred Franke, Jochen BMC Med Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) imaging with a mobile C-arm has proven to be a valuable intraoperative tool in trauma surgery. However, little data is available concerning its use in the treatment of elbow fractures. The aim of the current study was to determine the intraoperative findings and consequences of 3D imaging in the treatment of elbow fractures. METHODS: Between 2001 and 2015, prospectively collected data of 36 patients who underwent intraoperative 3D imaging during elbow surgery were recorded. The findings and consequences of the intraoperative 3D scans were analyzed in a retrospective chart review. For clinical evaluation the analysis included the patients’ medical history, the injury pattern of the affected elbow and concomitant injuries. Intraoperative and postoperative complications and revision surgeries were evaluated as well. RESULTS: In 6 patients (16.7 %) analysis of the intraoperative 3D scan led to an immediate revision due to the detection of intra-articular screw placement (n = 3, 8.3 %) and remaining intra-articular step of >2 mm (n = 3, 8.3 %). In all of these patients, correct implant positioning and anatomical reduction could be achieved after immediate intraoperative revision, which was verified by a repeated intraoperative 3D scan. None of the 36 patients needed surgical revision based on postoperative radiological examinations due to secondary dislocation, wrong implant placement or remaining steps in the articular surface. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative 3D imaging offers additional information about fracture reduction and implant positioning in the treatment of elbow fractures compared to conventional intraoperative 2D imaging. It may therefore reduce the need for revision surgery. The value of intraoperative 3D imaging for clinical outcomes still needs to be assessed. BioMed Central 2016-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4797343/ /pubmed/26987661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-016-0126-z Text en © Schnetzke et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schnetzke, Marc
Fuchs, Julia
Vetter, Sven Y.
Beisemann, Nils
Keil, Holger
Grützner, Paul-Alfred
Franke, Jochen
Intraoperative 3D imaging in the treatment of elbow fractures - a retrospective analysis of indications, intraoperative revision rates, and implications in 36 cases
title Intraoperative 3D imaging in the treatment of elbow fractures - a retrospective analysis of indications, intraoperative revision rates, and implications in 36 cases
title_full Intraoperative 3D imaging in the treatment of elbow fractures - a retrospective analysis of indications, intraoperative revision rates, and implications in 36 cases
title_fullStr Intraoperative 3D imaging in the treatment of elbow fractures - a retrospective analysis of indications, intraoperative revision rates, and implications in 36 cases
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative 3D imaging in the treatment of elbow fractures - a retrospective analysis of indications, intraoperative revision rates, and implications in 36 cases
title_short Intraoperative 3D imaging in the treatment of elbow fractures - a retrospective analysis of indications, intraoperative revision rates, and implications in 36 cases
title_sort intraoperative 3d imaging in the treatment of elbow fractures - a retrospective analysis of indications, intraoperative revision rates, and implications in 36 cases
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4797343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26987661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-016-0126-z
work_keys_str_mv AT schnetzkemarc intraoperative3dimaginginthetreatmentofelbowfracturesaretrospectiveanalysisofindicationsintraoperativerevisionratesandimplicationsin36cases
AT fuchsjulia intraoperative3dimaginginthetreatmentofelbowfracturesaretrospectiveanalysisofindicationsintraoperativerevisionratesandimplicationsin36cases
AT vettersveny intraoperative3dimaginginthetreatmentofelbowfracturesaretrospectiveanalysisofindicationsintraoperativerevisionratesandimplicationsin36cases
AT beisemannnils intraoperative3dimaginginthetreatmentofelbowfracturesaretrospectiveanalysisofindicationsintraoperativerevisionratesandimplicationsin36cases
AT keilholger intraoperative3dimaginginthetreatmentofelbowfracturesaretrospectiveanalysisofindicationsintraoperativerevisionratesandimplicationsin36cases
AT grutznerpaulalfred intraoperative3dimaginginthetreatmentofelbowfracturesaretrospectiveanalysisofindicationsintraoperativerevisionratesandimplicationsin36cases
AT frankejochen intraoperative3dimaginginthetreatmentofelbowfracturesaretrospectiveanalysisofindicationsintraoperativerevisionratesandimplicationsin36cases