Cargando…
A lover or a fighter? Opposing sexual selection pressures on men’s vocal pitch and facial hair
The traditional assumption within the research literature on human sexually dimorphic traits has been that many sex differences have arisen from intersexual selection. More recently, however, there has been a shift toward the idea that many male features, including male lower-pitched voices and male...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4797380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27004013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv178 |
_version_ | 1782421946288308224 |
---|---|
author | Saxton, Tamsin K. Mackey, Lauren L. McCarty, Kristofor Neave, Nick |
author_facet | Saxton, Tamsin K. Mackey, Lauren L. McCarty, Kristofor Neave, Nick |
author_sort | Saxton, Tamsin K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The traditional assumption within the research literature on human sexually dimorphic traits has been that many sex differences have arisen from intersexual selection. More recently, however, there has been a shift toward the idea that many male features, including male lower-pitched voices and male beard growth, might have arisen predominantly through intrasexual selection: that is, to serve the purpose of male–male competition instead of mate attraction. In this study, using a unique set of video stimuli, we measured people’s perceptions of the dominance and attractiveness of men who differ both in terms of voice pitch (4 levels from lower to higher pitched) and beard growth (4 levels from clean shaven to a month’s hair growth). We found a nonlinear relationship between lower pitch and increased attractiveness; men’s vocal attractiveness peaked at around 96 Hz. Beard growth had equivocal effects on attractiveness judgments. In contrast, perceptions of men’s dominance simply increased with increasing masculinity (i.e., with lower-pitched voices and greater beard growth). Together, these results suggest that the optimal level of physical masculinity might differ depending on whether the outcome is social dominance or mate attraction. These dual selection pressures might maintain some of the documented variability in male physical and behavioral masculinity that we see today. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4797380 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47973802016-03-21 A lover or a fighter? Opposing sexual selection pressures on men’s vocal pitch and facial hair Saxton, Tamsin K. Mackey, Lauren L. McCarty, Kristofor Neave, Nick Behav Ecol Original Article The traditional assumption within the research literature on human sexually dimorphic traits has been that many sex differences have arisen from intersexual selection. More recently, however, there has been a shift toward the idea that many male features, including male lower-pitched voices and male beard growth, might have arisen predominantly through intrasexual selection: that is, to serve the purpose of male–male competition instead of mate attraction. In this study, using a unique set of video stimuli, we measured people’s perceptions of the dominance and attractiveness of men who differ both in terms of voice pitch (4 levels from lower to higher pitched) and beard growth (4 levels from clean shaven to a month’s hair growth). We found a nonlinear relationship between lower pitch and increased attractiveness; men’s vocal attractiveness peaked at around 96 Hz. Beard growth had equivocal effects on attractiveness judgments. In contrast, perceptions of men’s dominance simply increased with increasing masculinity (i.e., with lower-pitched voices and greater beard growth). Together, these results suggest that the optimal level of physical masculinity might differ depending on whether the outcome is social dominance or mate attraction. These dual selection pressures might maintain some of the documented variability in male physical and behavioral masculinity that we see today. Oxford University Press 2016 2015-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4797380/ /pubmed/27004013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv178 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Saxton, Tamsin K. Mackey, Lauren L. McCarty, Kristofor Neave, Nick A lover or a fighter? Opposing sexual selection pressures on men’s vocal pitch and facial hair |
title | A lover or a fighter? Opposing sexual selection pressures on men’s vocal pitch and facial hair |
title_full | A lover or a fighter? Opposing sexual selection pressures on men’s vocal pitch and facial hair |
title_fullStr | A lover or a fighter? Opposing sexual selection pressures on men’s vocal pitch and facial hair |
title_full_unstemmed | A lover or a fighter? Opposing sexual selection pressures on men’s vocal pitch and facial hair |
title_short | A lover or a fighter? Opposing sexual selection pressures on men’s vocal pitch and facial hair |
title_sort | lover or a fighter? opposing sexual selection pressures on men’s vocal pitch and facial hair |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4797380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27004013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv178 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saxtontamsink aloverorafighteropposingsexualselectionpressuresonmensvocalpitchandfacialhair AT mackeylaurenl aloverorafighteropposingsexualselectionpressuresonmensvocalpitchandfacialhair AT mccartykristofor aloverorafighteropposingsexualselectionpressuresonmensvocalpitchandfacialhair AT neavenick aloverorafighteropposingsexualselectionpressuresonmensvocalpitchandfacialhair AT saxtontamsink loverorafighteropposingsexualselectionpressuresonmensvocalpitchandfacialhair AT mackeylaurenl loverorafighteropposingsexualselectionpressuresonmensvocalpitchandfacialhair AT mccartykristofor loverorafighteropposingsexualselectionpressuresonmensvocalpitchandfacialhair AT neavenick loverorafighteropposingsexualselectionpressuresonmensvocalpitchandfacialhair |