Cargando…

Diabetic neuropathy increases stimulation threshold during popliteal sciatic nerve block(†)

BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve stimulation is commonly used for nerve localization in regional anaesthesia, but recommended stimulation currents of 0.3–0.5 mA do not reliably produce motor activity in the absence of intraneural needle placement. As this may be particularly true in patients with diabet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heschl, S., Hallmann, B., Zilke, T., Gemes, G., Schoerghuber, M., Auer-Grumbach, M., Quehenberger, F., Lirk, P., Hogan, Q., Rigaud, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4797685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26994231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew027
_version_ 1782422003005784064
author Heschl, S.
Hallmann, B.
Zilke, T.
Gemes, G.
Schoerghuber, M.
Auer-Grumbach, M.
Quehenberger, F.
Lirk, P.
Hogan, Q.
Rigaud, M.
author_facet Heschl, S.
Hallmann, B.
Zilke, T.
Gemes, G.
Schoerghuber, M.
Auer-Grumbach, M.
Quehenberger, F.
Lirk, P.
Hogan, Q.
Rigaud, M.
author_sort Heschl, S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve stimulation is commonly used for nerve localization in regional anaesthesia, but recommended stimulation currents of 0.3–0.5 mA do not reliably produce motor activity in the absence of intraneural needle placement. As this may be particularly true in patients with diabetic neuropathy, we examined the stimulation threshold in patients with and without diabetes. METHODS: Preoperative evaluation included a neurological exam and electroneurography. During ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block, we measured the current required to produce motor activity for the tibial and common peroneal nerve in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Proximity to the nerve was evaluated post-hoc using ultrasound imaging. RESULTS: Average stimulation currents did not differ between diabetic (n=55) and non-diabetic patients (n=52). Although the planned number of patients was not reached, the power goal for the mean stimulation current was met. Subjects with diminished pressure perception showed increased thresholds for the common peroneal nerve (median 1.30 vs. 0.57 mA in subjects with normal perception, P=0.042), as did subjects with decreased pain sensation (1.60 vs. 0.50 mA in subjects with normal sensation, P=0.038). Slowed ulnar nerve conduction velocity predicted elevated mean stimulation current (r=−0.35, P=0.002). Finally, 15 diabetic patients required more than 0.5 mA to evoke a motor response, despite intraneural needle placement (n=4), or required currents ≥2 mA despite needle-nerve contact, vs three such patients (1 intraneural, 2 with ≥2 mA) among non-diabetic patients (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that stimulation thresholds of 0.3–0.5 mA may not reliably determine close needle-nerve contact during popliteal sciatic nerve block, particularly in patients with diabetic neuropathy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01488474
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4797685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47976852016-03-21 Diabetic neuropathy increases stimulation threshold during popliteal sciatic nerve block(†) Heschl, S. Hallmann, B. Zilke, T. Gemes, G. Schoerghuber, M. Auer-Grumbach, M. Quehenberger, F. Lirk, P. Hogan, Q. Rigaud, M. Br J Anaesth Regional Anaesthesia BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve stimulation is commonly used for nerve localization in regional anaesthesia, but recommended stimulation currents of 0.3–0.5 mA do not reliably produce motor activity in the absence of intraneural needle placement. As this may be particularly true in patients with diabetic neuropathy, we examined the stimulation threshold in patients with and without diabetes. METHODS: Preoperative evaluation included a neurological exam and electroneurography. During ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block, we measured the current required to produce motor activity for the tibial and common peroneal nerve in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Proximity to the nerve was evaluated post-hoc using ultrasound imaging. RESULTS: Average stimulation currents did not differ between diabetic (n=55) and non-diabetic patients (n=52). Although the planned number of patients was not reached, the power goal for the mean stimulation current was met. Subjects with diminished pressure perception showed increased thresholds for the common peroneal nerve (median 1.30 vs. 0.57 mA in subjects with normal perception, P=0.042), as did subjects with decreased pain sensation (1.60 vs. 0.50 mA in subjects with normal sensation, P=0.038). Slowed ulnar nerve conduction velocity predicted elevated mean stimulation current (r=−0.35, P=0.002). Finally, 15 diabetic patients required more than 0.5 mA to evoke a motor response, despite intraneural needle placement (n=4), or required currents ≥2 mA despite needle-nerve contact, vs three such patients (1 intraneural, 2 with ≥2 mA) among non-diabetic patients (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that stimulation thresholds of 0.3–0.5 mA may not reliably determine close needle-nerve contact during popliteal sciatic nerve block, particularly in patients with diabetic neuropathy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01488474 Oxford University Press 2016-04 2016-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4797685/ /pubmed/26994231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew027 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Regional Anaesthesia
Heschl, S.
Hallmann, B.
Zilke, T.
Gemes, G.
Schoerghuber, M.
Auer-Grumbach, M.
Quehenberger, F.
Lirk, P.
Hogan, Q.
Rigaud, M.
Diabetic neuropathy increases stimulation threshold during popliteal sciatic nerve block(†)
title Diabetic neuropathy increases stimulation threshold during popliteal sciatic nerve block(†)
title_full Diabetic neuropathy increases stimulation threshold during popliteal sciatic nerve block(†)
title_fullStr Diabetic neuropathy increases stimulation threshold during popliteal sciatic nerve block(†)
title_full_unstemmed Diabetic neuropathy increases stimulation threshold during popliteal sciatic nerve block(†)
title_short Diabetic neuropathy increases stimulation threshold during popliteal sciatic nerve block(†)
title_sort diabetic neuropathy increases stimulation threshold during popliteal sciatic nerve block(†)
topic Regional Anaesthesia
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4797685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26994231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew027
work_keys_str_mv AT heschls diabeticneuropathyincreasesstimulationthresholdduringpoplitealsciaticnerveblock
AT hallmannb diabeticneuropathyincreasesstimulationthresholdduringpoplitealsciaticnerveblock
AT zilket diabeticneuropathyincreasesstimulationthresholdduringpoplitealsciaticnerveblock
AT gemesg diabeticneuropathyincreasesstimulationthresholdduringpoplitealsciaticnerveblock
AT schoerghuberm diabeticneuropathyincreasesstimulationthresholdduringpoplitealsciaticnerveblock
AT auergrumbachm diabeticneuropathyincreasesstimulationthresholdduringpoplitealsciaticnerveblock
AT quehenbergerf diabeticneuropathyincreasesstimulationthresholdduringpoplitealsciaticnerveblock
AT lirkp diabeticneuropathyincreasesstimulationthresholdduringpoplitealsciaticnerveblock
AT hoganq diabeticneuropathyincreasesstimulationthresholdduringpoplitealsciaticnerveblock
AT rigaudm diabeticneuropathyincreasesstimulationthresholdduringpoplitealsciaticnerveblock