Cargando…

1036. Comparison of the hemodynamic parameters of two external chest compression devices (LUCAS versus AUTOPULSE) in a swine model of ventricular fibrillation

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pantazopoulos, C, Floros, I, Mega, A, Rigas, C, Pavleas, I, Vernikos, P, Archontoulis, N, Xanthis, D, Iacovidou, N, Xanthos, T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4798117/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2197-425X-2-S1-P83
_version_ 1782422088633548800
author Pantazopoulos, C
Floros, I
Mega, A
Rigas, C
Pavleas, I
Vernikos, P
Archontoulis, N
Xanthis, D
Iacovidou, N
Xanthos, T
author_facet Pantazopoulos, C
Floros, I
Mega, A
Rigas, C
Pavleas, I
Vernikos, P
Archontoulis, N
Xanthis, D
Iacovidou, N
Xanthos, T
author_sort Pantazopoulos, C
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4798117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47981172016-07-06 1036. Comparison of the hemodynamic parameters of two external chest compression devices (LUCAS versus AUTOPULSE) in a swine model of ventricular fibrillation Pantazopoulos, C Floros, I Mega, A Rigas, C Pavleas, I Vernikos, P Archontoulis, N Xanthis, D Iacovidou, N Xanthos, T Intensive Care Med Exp Poster Presentation Springer International Publishing 2014-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4798117/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2197-425X-2-S1-P83 Text en © Pantazopoulos et al; licensee Springer. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Presentation
Pantazopoulos, C
Floros, I
Mega, A
Rigas, C
Pavleas, I
Vernikos, P
Archontoulis, N
Xanthis, D
Iacovidou, N
Xanthos, T
1036. Comparison of the hemodynamic parameters of two external chest compression devices (LUCAS versus AUTOPULSE) in a swine model of ventricular fibrillation
title 1036. Comparison of the hemodynamic parameters of two external chest compression devices (LUCAS versus AUTOPULSE) in a swine model of ventricular fibrillation
title_full 1036. Comparison of the hemodynamic parameters of two external chest compression devices (LUCAS versus AUTOPULSE) in a swine model of ventricular fibrillation
title_fullStr 1036. Comparison of the hemodynamic parameters of two external chest compression devices (LUCAS versus AUTOPULSE) in a swine model of ventricular fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed 1036. Comparison of the hemodynamic parameters of two external chest compression devices (LUCAS versus AUTOPULSE) in a swine model of ventricular fibrillation
title_short 1036. Comparison of the hemodynamic parameters of two external chest compression devices (LUCAS versus AUTOPULSE) in a swine model of ventricular fibrillation
title_sort 1036. comparison of the hemodynamic parameters of two external chest compression devices (lucas versus autopulse) in a swine model of ventricular fibrillation
topic Poster Presentation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4798117/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2197-425X-2-S1-P83
work_keys_str_mv AT pantazopoulosc 1036comparisonofthehemodynamicparametersoftwoexternalchestcompressiondeviceslucasversusautopulseinaswinemodelofventricularfibrillation
AT florosi 1036comparisonofthehemodynamicparametersoftwoexternalchestcompressiondeviceslucasversusautopulseinaswinemodelofventricularfibrillation
AT megaa 1036comparisonofthehemodynamicparametersoftwoexternalchestcompressiondeviceslucasversusautopulseinaswinemodelofventricularfibrillation
AT rigasc 1036comparisonofthehemodynamicparametersoftwoexternalchestcompressiondeviceslucasversusautopulseinaswinemodelofventricularfibrillation
AT pavleasi 1036comparisonofthehemodynamicparametersoftwoexternalchestcompressiondeviceslucasversusautopulseinaswinemodelofventricularfibrillation
AT vernikosp 1036comparisonofthehemodynamicparametersoftwoexternalchestcompressiondeviceslucasversusautopulseinaswinemodelofventricularfibrillation
AT archontoulisn 1036comparisonofthehemodynamicparametersoftwoexternalchestcompressiondeviceslucasversusautopulseinaswinemodelofventricularfibrillation
AT xanthisd 1036comparisonofthehemodynamicparametersoftwoexternalchestcompressiondeviceslucasversusautopulseinaswinemodelofventricularfibrillation
AT iacovidoun 1036comparisonofthehemodynamicparametersoftwoexternalchestcompressiondeviceslucasversusautopulseinaswinemodelofventricularfibrillation
AT xanthost 1036comparisonofthehemodynamicparametersoftwoexternalchestcompressiondeviceslucasversusautopulseinaswinemodelofventricularfibrillation