Cargando…
Macroecological scale effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functions under environmental change
Conserving different spatial and temporal dimensions of biological diversity is considered necessary for maintaining ecosystem functions under predicted global change scenarios. Recent work has shifted the focus from spatially local (α‐diversity) to macroecological scales (β‐ and γ‐diversity), empha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4798165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27066246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2036 |
_version_ | 1782422098354896896 |
---|---|
author | Burley, Hugh M Mokany, Karel Ferrier, Simon Laffan, Shawn W Williams, Kristen J Harwood, Tom D |
author_facet | Burley, Hugh M Mokany, Karel Ferrier, Simon Laffan, Shawn W Williams, Kristen J Harwood, Tom D |
author_sort | Burley, Hugh M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Conserving different spatial and temporal dimensions of biological diversity is considered necessary for maintaining ecosystem functions under predicted global change scenarios. Recent work has shifted the focus from spatially local (α‐diversity) to macroecological scales (β‐ and γ‐diversity), emphasizing links between macroecological biodiversity and ecosystem functions (MB–EF relationships). However, before the outcomes of MB–EF analyses can be useful to real‐world decisions, empirical modeling needs to be developed for natural ecosystems, incorporating a broader range of data inputs, environmental change scenarios, underlying mechanisms, and predictions. We outline the key conceptual and technical challenges currently faced in developing such models and in testing and calibrating the relationships assumed in these models using data from real ecosystems. These challenges are explored in relation to two potential MB–EF mechanisms: “macroecological complementarity” and “spatiotemporal compensation.” Several regions have been sufficiently well studied over space and time to robustly test these mechanisms by combining cutting‐edge spatiotemporal methods with remotely sensed data, including plant community data sets in Australia, Europe, and North America. Assessing empirical MB–EF relationships at broad spatiotemporal scales will be crucial in ensuring these macroecological processes can be adequately considered in the management of biodiversity and ecosystem functions under global change. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4798165 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47981652016-04-08 Macroecological scale effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functions under environmental change Burley, Hugh M Mokany, Karel Ferrier, Simon Laffan, Shawn W Williams, Kristen J Harwood, Tom D Ecol Evol Hypotheses Conserving different spatial and temporal dimensions of biological diversity is considered necessary for maintaining ecosystem functions under predicted global change scenarios. Recent work has shifted the focus from spatially local (α‐diversity) to macroecological scales (β‐ and γ‐diversity), emphasizing links between macroecological biodiversity and ecosystem functions (MB–EF relationships). However, before the outcomes of MB–EF analyses can be useful to real‐world decisions, empirical modeling needs to be developed for natural ecosystems, incorporating a broader range of data inputs, environmental change scenarios, underlying mechanisms, and predictions. We outline the key conceptual and technical challenges currently faced in developing such models and in testing and calibrating the relationships assumed in these models using data from real ecosystems. These challenges are explored in relation to two potential MB–EF mechanisms: “macroecological complementarity” and “spatiotemporal compensation.” Several regions have been sufficiently well studied over space and time to robustly test these mechanisms by combining cutting‐edge spatiotemporal methods with remotely sensed data, including plant community data sets in Australia, Europe, and North America. Assessing empirical MB–EF relationships at broad spatiotemporal scales will be crucial in ensuring these macroecological processes can be adequately considered in the management of biodiversity and ecosystem functions under global change. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4798165/ /pubmed/27066246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2036 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Hypotheses Burley, Hugh M Mokany, Karel Ferrier, Simon Laffan, Shawn W Williams, Kristen J Harwood, Tom D Macroecological scale effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functions under environmental change |
title | Macroecological scale effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functions under environmental change |
title_full | Macroecological scale effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functions under environmental change |
title_fullStr | Macroecological scale effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functions under environmental change |
title_full_unstemmed | Macroecological scale effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functions under environmental change |
title_short | Macroecological scale effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functions under environmental change |
title_sort | macroecological scale effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functions under environmental change |
topic | Hypotheses |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4798165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27066246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burleyhughm macroecologicalscaleeffectsofbiodiversityonecosystemfunctionsunderenvironmentalchange AT mokanykarel macroecologicalscaleeffectsofbiodiversityonecosystemfunctionsunderenvironmentalchange AT ferriersimon macroecologicalscaleeffectsofbiodiversityonecosystemfunctionsunderenvironmentalchange AT laffanshawnw macroecologicalscaleeffectsofbiodiversityonecosystemfunctionsunderenvironmentalchange AT williamskristenj macroecologicalscaleeffectsofbiodiversityonecosystemfunctionsunderenvironmentalchange AT harwoodtomd macroecologicalscaleeffectsofbiodiversityonecosystemfunctionsunderenvironmentalchange |