Cargando…

Macroecological scale effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functions under environmental change

Conserving different spatial and temporal dimensions of biological diversity is considered necessary for maintaining ecosystem functions under predicted global change scenarios. Recent work has shifted the focus from spatially local (α‐diversity) to macroecological scales (β‐ and γ‐diversity), empha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burley, Hugh M, Mokany, Karel, Ferrier, Simon, Laffan, Shawn W, Williams, Kristen J, Harwood, Tom D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4798165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27066246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2036
_version_ 1782422098354896896
author Burley, Hugh M
Mokany, Karel
Ferrier, Simon
Laffan, Shawn W
Williams, Kristen J
Harwood, Tom D
author_facet Burley, Hugh M
Mokany, Karel
Ferrier, Simon
Laffan, Shawn W
Williams, Kristen J
Harwood, Tom D
author_sort Burley, Hugh M
collection PubMed
description Conserving different spatial and temporal dimensions of biological diversity is considered necessary for maintaining ecosystem functions under predicted global change scenarios. Recent work has shifted the focus from spatially local (α‐diversity) to macroecological scales (β‐ and γ‐diversity), emphasizing links between macroecological biodiversity and ecosystem functions (MB–EF relationships). However, before the outcomes of MB–EF analyses can be useful to real‐world decisions, empirical modeling needs to be developed for natural ecosystems, incorporating a broader range of data inputs, environmental change scenarios, underlying mechanisms, and predictions. We outline the key conceptual and technical challenges currently faced in developing such models and in testing and calibrating the relationships assumed in these models using data from real ecosystems. These challenges are explored in relation to two potential MB–EF mechanisms: “macroecological complementarity” and “spatiotemporal compensation.” Several regions have been sufficiently well studied over space and time to robustly test these mechanisms by combining cutting‐edge spatiotemporal methods with remotely sensed data, including plant community data sets in Australia, Europe, and North America. Assessing empirical MB–EF relationships at broad spatiotemporal scales will be crucial in ensuring these macroecological processes can be adequately considered in the management of biodiversity and ecosystem functions under global change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4798165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47981652016-04-08 Macroecological scale effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functions under environmental change Burley, Hugh M Mokany, Karel Ferrier, Simon Laffan, Shawn W Williams, Kristen J Harwood, Tom D Ecol Evol Hypotheses Conserving different spatial and temporal dimensions of biological diversity is considered necessary for maintaining ecosystem functions under predicted global change scenarios. Recent work has shifted the focus from spatially local (α‐diversity) to macroecological scales (β‐ and γ‐diversity), emphasizing links between macroecological biodiversity and ecosystem functions (MB–EF relationships). However, before the outcomes of MB–EF analyses can be useful to real‐world decisions, empirical modeling needs to be developed for natural ecosystems, incorporating a broader range of data inputs, environmental change scenarios, underlying mechanisms, and predictions. We outline the key conceptual and technical challenges currently faced in developing such models and in testing and calibrating the relationships assumed in these models using data from real ecosystems. These challenges are explored in relation to two potential MB–EF mechanisms: “macroecological complementarity” and “spatiotemporal compensation.” Several regions have been sufficiently well studied over space and time to robustly test these mechanisms by combining cutting‐edge spatiotemporal methods with remotely sensed data, including plant community data sets in Australia, Europe, and North America. Assessing empirical MB–EF relationships at broad spatiotemporal scales will be crucial in ensuring these macroecological processes can be adequately considered in the management of biodiversity and ecosystem functions under global change. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4798165/ /pubmed/27066246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2036 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Hypotheses
Burley, Hugh M
Mokany, Karel
Ferrier, Simon
Laffan, Shawn W
Williams, Kristen J
Harwood, Tom D
Macroecological scale effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functions under environmental change
title Macroecological scale effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functions under environmental change
title_full Macroecological scale effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functions under environmental change
title_fullStr Macroecological scale effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functions under environmental change
title_full_unstemmed Macroecological scale effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functions under environmental change
title_short Macroecological scale effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functions under environmental change
title_sort macroecological scale effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functions under environmental change
topic Hypotheses
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4798165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27066246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2036
work_keys_str_mv AT burleyhughm macroecologicalscaleeffectsofbiodiversityonecosystemfunctionsunderenvironmentalchange
AT mokanykarel macroecologicalscaleeffectsofbiodiversityonecosystemfunctionsunderenvironmentalchange
AT ferriersimon macroecologicalscaleeffectsofbiodiversityonecosystemfunctionsunderenvironmentalchange
AT laffanshawnw macroecologicalscaleeffectsofbiodiversityonecosystemfunctionsunderenvironmentalchange
AT williamskristenj macroecologicalscaleeffectsofbiodiversityonecosystemfunctionsunderenvironmentalchange
AT harwoodtomd macroecologicalscaleeffectsofbiodiversityonecosystemfunctionsunderenvironmentalchange