Cargando…

Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process

Consolidated memories return to a labile state after the presentation of cues (reminders) associated with acquisition, followed by a period of stabilization (reconsolidation). However not all cues are equally effective in initiating the process, unpredictable cues triggered it, predictable cues do n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forcato, Cecilia, Bavassi, Luz, De Pino, Gabriela, Fernández, Rodrigo Sebastián, Villarreal, Mirta Fabiana, Pedreira, María Eugenia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4798722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26991776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151381
_version_ 1782422211236200448
author Forcato, Cecilia
Bavassi, Luz
De Pino, Gabriela
Fernández, Rodrigo Sebastián
Villarreal, Mirta Fabiana
Pedreira, María Eugenia
author_facet Forcato, Cecilia
Bavassi, Luz
De Pino, Gabriela
Fernández, Rodrigo Sebastián
Villarreal, Mirta Fabiana
Pedreira, María Eugenia
author_sort Forcato, Cecilia
collection PubMed
description Consolidated memories return to a labile state after the presentation of cues (reminders) associated with acquisition, followed by a period of stabilization (reconsolidation). However not all cues are equally effective in initiating the process, unpredictable cues triggered it, predictable cues do not. We hypothesize that the different effects observed by the different reminder types on memory labilization-reconsolidation depend on a differential neural involvement during reminder presentation. To test it, we developed a declarative task and compared the efficacy of three reminder types in triggering the process in humans (Experiment 1). Finally, we compared the brain activation patterns between the different conditions using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) (Experiment 2). We confirmed that the unpredictable reminder is the most effective in initiating the labilization-reconsolidation process. Furthermore, only under this condition there was differential left hippocampal activation during its presentation. We suggest that the left hippocampus is detecting the incongruence between actual and past events and allows the memory to be updated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4798722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47987222016-03-23 Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process Forcato, Cecilia Bavassi, Luz De Pino, Gabriela Fernández, Rodrigo Sebastián Villarreal, Mirta Fabiana Pedreira, María Eugenia PLoS One Research Article Consolidated memories return to a labile state after the presentation of cues (reminders) associated with acquisition, followed by a period of stabilization (reconsolidation). However not all cues are equally effective in initiating the process, unpredictable cues triggered it, predictable cues do not. We hypothesize that the different effects observed by the different reminder types on memory labilization-reconsolidation depend on a differential neural involvement during reminder presentation. To test it, we developed a declarative task and compared the efficacy of three reminder types in triggering the process in humans (Experiment 1). Finally, we compared the brain activation patterns between the different conditions using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) (Experiment 2). We confirmed that the unpredictable reminder is the most effective in initiating the labilization-reconsolidation process. Furthermore, only under this condition there was differential left hippocampal activation during its presentation. We suggest that the left hippocampus is detecting the incongruence between actual and past events and allows the memory to be updated. Public Library of Science 2016-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4798722/ /pubmed/26991776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151381 Text en © 2016 Forcato et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Forcato, Cecilia
Bavassi, Luz
De Pino, Gabriela
Fernández, Rodrigo Sebastián
Villarreal, Mirta Fabiana
Pedreira, María Eugenia
Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process
title Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process
title_full Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process
title_fullStr Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process
title_full_unstemmed Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process
title_short Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process
title_sort differential left hippocampal activation during retrieval with different types of reminders: an fmri study of the reconsolidation process
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4798722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26991776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151381
work_keys_str_mv AT forcatocecilia differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess
AT bavassiluz differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess
AT depinogabriela differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess
AT fernandezrodrigosebastian differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess
AT villarrealmirtafabiana differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess
AT pedreiramariaeugenia differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess