Cargando…
Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process
Consolidated memories return to a labile state after the presentation of cues (reminders) associated with acquisition, followed by a period of stabilization (reconsolidation). However not all cues are equally effective in initiating the process, unpredictable cues triggered it, predictable cues do n...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4798722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26991776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151381 |
_version_ | 1782422211236200448 |
---|---|
author | Forcato, Cecilia Bavassi, Luz De Pino, Gabriela Fernández, Rodrigo Sebastián Villarreal, Mirta Fabiana Pedreira, María Eugenia |
author_facet | Forcato, Cecilia Bavassi, Luz De Pino, Gabriela Fernández, Rodrigo Sebastián Villarreal, Mirta Fabiana Pedreira, María Eugenia |
author_sort | Forcato, Cecilia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Consolidated memories return to a labile state after the presentation of cues (reminders) associated with acquisition, followed by a period of stabilization (reconsolidation). However not all cues are equally effective in initiating the process, unpredictable cues triggered it, predictable cues do not. We hypothesize that the different effects observed by the different reminder types on memory labilization-reconsolidation depend on a differential neural involvement during reminder presentation. To test it, we developed a declarative task and compared the efficacy of three reminder types in triggering the process in humans (Experiment 1). Finally, we compared the brain activation patterns between the different conditions using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) (Experiment 2). We confirmed that the unpredictable reminder is the most effective in initiating the labilization-reconsolidation process. Furthermore, only under this condition there was differential left hippocampal activation during its presentation. We suggest that the left hippocampus is detecting the incongruence between actual and past events and allows the memory to be updated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4798722 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47987222016-03-23 Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process Forcato, Cecilia Bavassi, Luz De Pino, Gabriela Fernández, Rodrigo Sebastián Villarreal, Mirta Fabiana Pedreira, María Eugenia PLoS One Research Article Consolidated memories return to a labile state after the presentation of cues (reminders) associated with acquisition, followed by a period of stabilization (reconsolidation). However not all cues are equally effective in initiating the process, unpredictable cues triggered it, predictable cues do not. We hypothesize that the different effects observed by the different reminder types on memory labilization-reconsolidation depend on a differential neural involvement during reminder presentation. To test it, we developed a declarative task and compared the efficacy of three reminder types in triggering the process in humans (Experiment 1). Finally, we compared the brain activation patterns between the different conditions using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) (Experiment 2). We confirmed that the unpredictable reminder is the most effective in initiating the labilization-reconsolidation process. Furthermore, only under this condition there was differential left hippocampal activation during its presentation. We suggest that the left hippocampus is detecting the incongruence between actual and past events and allows the memory to be updated. Public Library of Science 2016-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4798722/ /pubmed/26991776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151381 Text en © 2016 Forcato et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Forcato, Cecilia Bavassi, Luz De Pino, Gabriela Fernández, Rodrigo Sebastián Villarreal, Mirta Fabiana Pedreira, María Eugenia Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process |
title | Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process |
title_full | Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process |
title_fullStr | Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process |
title_full_unstemmed | Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process |
title_short | Differential Left Hippocampal Activation during Retrieval with Different Types of Reminders: An fMRI Study of the Reconsolidation Process |
title_sort | differential left hippocampal activation during retrieval with different types of reminders: an fmri study of the reconsolidation process |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4798722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26991776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151381 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT forcatocecilia differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess AT bavassiluz differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess AT depinogabriela differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess AT fernandezrodrigosebastian differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess AT villarrealmirtafabiana differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess AT pedreiramariaeugenia differentiallefthippocampalactivationduringretrievalwithdifferenttypesofremindersanfmristudyofthereconsolidationprocess |