Cargando…
An explorative study from the Norwegian Quality Register Gastronet comparing self-estimated versus registered quality in colonoscopy performance
Background and study aims: The value of a colonoscopy quality assurance (QA) register may be questioned if it brings no new information on which to act for quality improvement, e. g. if self-assessed quality of colonoscopy performance correlates perfectly with registered performance. Patients and me...
Autores principales: | Moritz, Volker, Holme, Oyvind, Leblanc, Marissa, Hoff, Geir |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4798930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27004252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-100904 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Gastronet survey on the use of one- or two-person technique for colonoscopy insertion
por: Hoff, Geir, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Registration bias in a clinical quality register
por: Hoff, Geir, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Cecum intubation rate as quality indicator in clinical versus screening colonoscopy
por: Hoff, Geir, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Polyp detection rates as quality indicator in clinical versus screening colonoscopy
por: Hoff, G., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Quality of life following hip fractures: results from the Norwegian hip fracture register
por: Gjertsen, Jan-Erik, et al.
Publicado: (2016)