Cargando…
LOCALIZATION OF THE TIBIAL ENTRY POINT
Objective: To assess the intramedullary nail entry point in the proximal region of the tibia, through a questionnaire. Methods: 230 participants undergoing treatment for tibial fractures were interviewed. The questionnaire was created with three sections that could be answered in a ”Yes” or “No” for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4799087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27022566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30383-9 |
_version_ | 1782422269531783168 |
---|---|
author | Labronici, Pedro José Moreira Junior, Ildeu Leite Lyra, Fúbio Soares Franco, José Sergio Hoffmann, Rolix de Toledo Lourenço, Paulo Roberto Barbosa Kojima, Kodi Kojima, Kodi |
author_facet | Labronici, Pedro José Moreira Junior, Ildeu Leite Lyra, Fúbio Soares Franco, José Sergio Hoffmann, Rolix de Toledo Lourenço, Paulo Roberto Barbosa Kojima, Kodi Kojima, Kodi |
author_sort | Labronici, Pedro José |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To assess the intramedullary nail entry point in the proximal region of the tibia, through a questionnaire. Methods: 230 participants undergoing treatment for tibial fractures were interviewed. The questionnaire was created with three sections that could be answered in a ”Yes” or “No” format and a fourth section that had two figures representing anteroposterior (AP) and lateral view x-rays that could be answered in an “A, “B” or “C” format. Results: The most frequent reason was “ease of access” (67.8%), followed by “better nail insertion access” (60.9%) and, in third place, “to prevent knee pain” (27.4%). The reasons for choosing the access so as to “prevent knee pain” and “avoid tendinitis” had a significant relationship with points “A” and “C” of the schematic AP x-ray figure, especially “C” (medial tibial crest). There were no significant differences between the types of access to the patellar ligament in the schematic AP and lateral x-ray figures between age groups. Conclusion: The greater the age was, the larger the proportion choosing the question “to avoid valgus deformity” was. The reasons from a medical (practical) perspective related to the type of access in the transpatellar ligament, while the reasons from a patient (functional) perspective related to medial parapatellar access. Transpatellar access was chosen by most of the participants (66.5%). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4799087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47990872016-03-28 LOCALIZATION OF THE TIBIAL ENTRY POINT Labronici, Pedro José Moreira Junior, Ildeu Leite Lyra, Fúbio Soares Franco, José Sergio Hoffmann, Rolix de Toledo Lourenço, Paulo Roberto Barbosa Kojima, Kodi Kojima, Kodi Rev Bras Ortop Original Article Objective: To assess the intramedullary nail entry point in the proximal region of the tibia, through a questionnaire. Methods: 230 participants undergoing treatment for tibial fractures were interviewed. The questionnaire was created with three sections that could be answered in a ”Yes” or “No” format and a fourth section that had two figures representing anteroposterior (AP) and lateral view x-rays that could be answered in an “A, “B” or “C” format. Results: The most frequent reason was “ease of access” (67.8%), followed by “better nail insertion access” (60.9%) and, in third place, “to prevent knee pain” (27.4%). The reasons for choosing the access so as to “prevent knee pain” and “avoid tendinitis” had a significant relationship with points “A” and “C” of the schematic AP x-ray figure, especially “C” (medial tibial crest). There were no significant differences between the types of access to the patellar ligament in the schematic AP and lateral x-ray figures between age groups. Conclusion: The greater the age was, the larger the proportion choosing the question “to avoid valgus deformity” was. The reasons from a medical (practical) perspective related to the type of access in the transpatellar ligament, while the reasons from a patient (functional) perspective related to medial parapatellar access. Transpatellar access was chosen by most of the participants (66.5%). Elsevier 2015-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4799087/ /pubmed/27022566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30383-9 Text en © 2010 Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Labronici, Pedro José Moreira Junior, Ildeu Leite Lyra, Fúbio Soares Franco, José Sergio Hoffmann, Rolix de Toledo Lourenço, Paulo Roberto Barbosa Kojima, Kodi Kojima, Kodi LOCALIZATION OF THE TIBIAL ENTRY POINT |
title | LOCALIZATION OF THE TIBIAL ENTRY POINT |
title_full | LOCALIZATION OF THE TIBIAL ENTRY POINT |
title_fullStr | LOCALIZATION OF THE TIBIAL ENTRY POINT |
title_full_unstemmed | LOCALIZATION OF THE TIBIAL ENTRY POINT |
title_short | LOCALIZATION OF THE TIBIAL ENTRY POINT |
title_sort | localization of the tibial entry point |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4799087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27022566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30383-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT labronicipedrojose localizationofthetibialentrypoint AT moreirajuniorildeuleite localizationofthetibialentrypoint AT lyrafubiosoares localizationofthetibialentrypoint AT francojosesergio localizationofthetibialentrypoint AT hoffmannrolix localizationofthetibialentrypoint AT detoledolourencopaulorobertobarbosa localizationofthetibialentrypoint AT kojimakodi localizationofthetibialentrypoint AT kojimakodi localizationofthetibialentrypoint |