Cargando…

LOCALIZATION OF THE TIBIAL ENTRY POINT

Objective: To assess the intramedullary nail entry point in the proximal region of the tibia, through a questionnaire. Methods: 230 participants undergoing treatment for tibial fractures were interviewed. The questionnaire was created with three sections that could be answered in a ”Yes” or “No” for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Labronici, Pedro José, Moreira Junior, Ildeu Leite, Lyra, Fúbio Soares, Franco, José Sergio, Hoffmann, Rolix, de Toledo Lourenço, Paulo Roberto Barbosa, Kojima, Kodi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4799087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27022566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30383-9
_version_ 1782422269531783168
author Labronici, Pedro José
Moreira Junior, Ildeu Leite
Lyra, Fúbio Soares
Franco, José Sergio
Hoffmann, Rolix
de Toledo Lourenço, Paulo Roberto Barbosa
Kojima, Kodi
Kojima, Kodi
author_facet Labronici, Pedro José
Moreira Junior, Ildeu Leite
Lyra, Fúbio Soares
Franco, José Sergio
Hoffmann, Rolix
de Toledo Lourenço, Paulo Roberto Barbosa
Kojima, Kodi
Kojima, Kodi
author_sort Labronici, Pedro José
collection PubMed
description Objective: To assess the intramedullary nail entry point in the proximal region of the tibia, through a questionnaire. Methods: 230 participants undergoing treatment for tibial fractures were interviewed. The questionnaire was created with three sections that could be answered in a ”Yes” or “No” format and a fourth section that had two figures representing anteroposterior (AP) and lateral view x-rays that could be answered in an “A, “B” or “C” format. Results: The most frequent reason was “ease of access” (67.8%), followed by “better nail insertion access” (60.9%) and, in third place, “to prevent knee pain” (27.4%). The reasons for choosing the access so as to “prevent knee pain” and “avoid tendinitis” had a significant relationship with points “A” and “C” of the schematic AP x-ray figure, especially “C” (medial tibial crest). There were no significant differences between the types of access to the patellar ligament in the schematic AP and lateral x-ray figures between age groups. Conclusion: The greater the age was, the larger the proportion choosing the question “to avoid valgus deformity” was. The reasons from a medical (practical) perspective related to the type of access in the transpatellar ligament, while the reasons from a patient (functional) perspective related to medial parapatellar access. Transpatellar access was chosen by most of the participants (66.5%).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4799087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47990872016-03-28 LOCALIZATION OF THE TIBIAL ENTRY POINT Labronici, Pedro José Moreira Junior, Ildeu Leite Lyra, Fúbio Soares Franco, José Sergio Hoffmann, Rolix de Toledo Lourenço, Paulo Roberto Barbosa Kojima, Kodi Kojima, Kodi Rev Bras Ortop Original Article Objective: To assess the intramedullary nail entry point in the proximal region of the tibia, through a questionnaire. Methods: 230 participants undergoing treatment for tibial fractures were interviewed. The questionnaire was created with three sections that could be answered in a ”Yes” or “No” format and a fourth section that had two figures representing anteroposterior (AP) and lateral view x-rays that could be answered in an “A, “B” or “C” format. Results: The most frequent reason was “ease of access” (67.8%), followed by “better nail insertion access” (60.9%) and, in third place, “to prevent knee pain” (27.4%). The reasons for choosing the access so as to “prevent knee pain” and “avoid tendinitis” had a significant relationship with points “A” and “C” of the schematic AP x-ray figure, especially “C” (medial tibial crest). There were no significant differences between the types of access to the patellar ligament in the schematic AP and lateral x-ray figures between age groups. Conclusion: The greater the age was, the larger the proportion choosing the question “to avoid valgus deformity” was. The reasons from a medical (practical) perspective related to the type of access in the transpatellar ligament, while the reasons from a patient (functional) perspective related to medial parapatellar access. Transpatellar access was chosen by most of the participants (66.5%). Elsevier 2015-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4799087/ /pubmed/27022566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30383-9 Text en © 2010 Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Labronici, Pedro José
Moreira Junior, Ildeu Leite
Lyra, Fúbio Soares
Franco, José Sergio
Hoffmann, Rolix
de Toledo Lourenço, Paulo Roberto Barbosa
Kojima, Kodi
Kojima, Kodi
LOCALIZATION OF THE TIBIAL ENTRY POINT
title LOCALIZATION OF THE TIBIAL ENTRY POINT
title_full LOCALIZATION OF THE TIBIAL ENTRY POINT
title_fullStr LOCALIZATION OF THE TIBIAL ENTRY POINT
title_full_unstemmed LOCALIZATION OF THE TIBIAL ENTRY POINT
title_short LOCALIZATION OF THE TIBIAL ENTRY POINT
title_sort localization of the tibial entry point
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4799087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27022566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30383-9
work_keys_str_mv AT labronicipedrojose localizationofthetibialentrypoint
AT moreirajuniorildeuleite localizationofthetibialentrypoint
AT lyrafubiosoares localizationofthetibialentrypoint
AT francojosesergio localizationofthetibialentrypoint
AT hoffmannrolix localizationofthetibialentrypoint
AT detoledolourencopaulorobertobarbosa localizationofthetibialentrypoint
AT kojimakodi localizationofthetibialentrypoint
AT kojimakodi localizationofthetibialentrypoint