Cargando…
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LUMBAR RANGE OF MOVEMENT IN HEALTHY ATHLETES AND NON-ATHLETES
Objective: To compare the amplitude of trunk flexion and extension through goniometry among athletes and non-athletes and to correlate these data with the popliteal angle and hamstring muscle tests. Methods: The amplitude of trunk flexion and extension was evaluated in 50 individuals who practiced s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4799100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27022568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30385-2 |
_version_ | 1782422272469893120 |
---|---|
author | Chertman, Carla Campoy dos Santos, Humberto Maldonado Pires, Leonardo Wajchenberg, Marcelo Martins, Delio Eulúlio Puertas, Eduardo Barros |
author_facet | Chertman, Carla Campoy dos Santos, Humberto Maldonado Pires, Leonardo Wajchenberg, Marcelo Martins, Delio Eulúlio Puertas, Eduardo Barros |
author_sort | Chertman, Carla |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To compare the amplitude of trunk flexion and extension through goniometry among athletes and non-athletes and to correlate these data with the popliteal angle and hamstring muscle tests. Methods: The amplitude of trunk flexion and extension was evaluated in 50 individuals who practiced sports on a regular basis and 50 non-athletes who did not present any painful lumber symptoms or any symptoms that could affect test performance. The measurements were made consecutively by two independent examiners by means of goniometry. The trunk flexion and extension values from the goniometry evaluation were correlated with the popliteal angle and hamstring flexibility tests, and the statistical correlation between them was analyzed. Results: The mean values obtained were 130.7 (101.9) for flexion and 40.2 (36.4) for extension. Statistically significant differences between the athletes and non-athletes were found in relation to the following parameters: goniometer in flexion with examiner 1, goniometer in flexion with examiner 2 and hamstring test. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in relation to the following parameters: goniometer in extension with examiner 1, goniometer in extension with examiner 2 and popliteal angle test. Conclusion: Individuals who practiced sports presented higher trunk flexion values. The use of goniometry to measure trunk amplitude showed variations in measurements between the examiners. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4799100 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47991002016-03-28 A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LUMBAR RANGE OF MOVEMENT IN HEALTHY ATHLETES AND NON-ATHLETES Chertman, Carla Campoy dos Santos, Humberto Maldonado Pires, Leonardo Wajchenberg, Marcelo Martins, Delio Eulúlio Puertas, Eduardo Barros Rev Bras Ortop Original Article Objective: To compare the amplitude of trunk flexion and extension through goniometry among athletes and non-athletes and to correlate these data with the popliteal angle and hamstring muscle tests. Methods: The amplitude of trunk flexion and extension was evaluated in 50 individuals who practiced sports on a regular basis and 50 non-athletes who did not present any painful lumber symptoms or any symptoms that could affect test performance. The measurements were made consecutively by two independent examiners by means of goniometry. The trunk flexion and extension values from the goniometry evaluation were correlated with the popliteal angle and hamstring flexibility tests, and the statistical correlation between them was analyzed. Results: The mean values obtained were 130.7 (101.9) for flexion and 40.2 (36.4) for extension. Statistically significant differences between the athletes and non-athletes were found in relation to the following parameters: goniometer in flexion with examiner 1, goniometer in flexion with examiner 2 and hamstring test. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in relation to the following parameters: goniometer in extension with examiner 1, goniometer in extension with examiner 2 and popliteal angle test. Conclusion: Individuals who practiced sports presented higher trunk flexion values. The use of goniometry to measure trunk amplitude showed variations in measurements between the examiners. Elsevier 2015-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4799100/ /pubmed/27022568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30385-2 Text en © 2010 Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chertman, Carla Campoy dos Santos, Humberto Maldonado Pires, Leonardo Wajchenberg, Marcelo Martins, Delio Eulúlio Puertas, Eduardo Barros A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LUMBAR RANGE OF MOVEMENT IN HEALTHY ATHLETES AND NON-ATHLETES |
title | A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LUMBAR RANGE OF MOVEMENT IN HEALTHY ATHLETES AND NON-ATHLETES |
title_full | A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LUMBAR RANGE OF MOVEMENT IN HEALTHY ATHLETES AND NON-ATHLETES |
title_fullStr | A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LUMBAR RANGE OF MOVEMENT IN HEALTHY ATHLETES AND NON-ATHLETES |
title_full_unstemmed | A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LUMBAR RANGE OF MOVEMENT IN HEALTHY ATHLETES AND NON-ATHLETES |
title_short | A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LUMBAR RANGE OF MOVEMENT IN HEALTHY ATHLETES AND NON-ATHLETES |
title_sort | comparative study of lumbar range of movement in healthy athletes and non-athletes |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4799100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27022568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30385-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chertmancarla acomparativestudyoflumbarrangeofmovementinhealthyathletesandnonathletes AT campoydossantoshumbertomaldonado acomparativestudyoflumbarrangeofmovementinhealthyathletesandnonathletes AT piresleonardo acomparativestudyoflumbarrangeofmovementinhealthyathletesandnonathletes AT wajchenbergmarcelo acomparativestudyoflumbarrangeofmovementinhealthyathletesandnonathletes AT martinsdelioeululio acomparativestudyoflumbarrangeofmovementinhealthyathletesandnonathletes AT puertaseduardobarros acomparativestudyoflumbarrangeofmovementinhealthyathletesandnonathletes AT chertmancarla comparativestudyoflumbarrangeofmovementinhealthyathletesandnonathletes AT campoydossantoshumbertomaldonado comparativestudyoflumbarrangeofmovementinhealthyathletesandnonathletes AT piresleonardo comparativestudyoflumbarrangeofmovementinhealthyathletesandnonathletes AT wajchenbergmarcelo comparativestudyoflumbarrangeofmovementinhealthyathletesandnonathletes AT martinsdelioeululio comparativestudyoflumbarrangeofmovementinhealthyathletesandnonathletes AT puertaseduardobarros comparativestudyoflumbarrangeofmovementinhealthyathletesandnonathletes |