Cargando…

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LUMBAR RANGE OF MOVEMENT IN HEALTHY ATHLETES AND NON-ATHLETES

Objective: To compare the amplitude of trunk flexion and extension through goniometry among athletes and non-athletes and to correlate these data with the popliteal angle and hamstring muscle tests. Methods: The amplitude of trunk flexion and extension was evaluated in 50 individuals who practiced s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chertman, Carla, Campoy dos Santos, Humberto Maldonado, Pires, Leonardo, Wajchenberg, Marcelo, Martins, Delio Eulúlio, Puertas, Eduardo Barros
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4799100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27022568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30385-2
_version_ 1782422272469893120
author Chertman, Carla
Campoy dos Santos, Humberto Maldonado
Pires, Leonardo
Wajchenberg, Marcelo
Martins, Delio Eulúlio
Puertas, Eduardo Barros
author_facet Chertman, Carla
Campoy dos Santos, Humberto Maldonado
Pires, Leonardo
Wajchenberg, Marcelo
Martins, Delio Eulúlio
Puertas, Eduardo Barros
author_sort Chertman, Carla
collection PubMed
description Objective: To compare the amplitude of trunk flexion and extension through goniometry among athletes and non-athletes and to correlate these data with the popliteal angle and hamstring muscle tests. Methods: The amplitude of trunk flexion and extension was evaluated in 50 individuals who practiced sports on a regular basis and 50 non-athletes who did not present any painful lumber symptoms or any symptoms that could affect test performance. The measurements were made consecutively by two independent examiners by means of goniometry. The trunk flexion and extension values from the goniometry evaluation were correlated with the popliteal angle and hamstring flexibility tests, and the statistical correlation between them was analyzed. Results: The mean values obtained were 130.7 (101.9) for flexion and 40.2 (36.4) for extension. Statistically significant differences between the athletes and non-athletes were found in relation to the following parameters: goniometer in flexion with examiner 1, goniometer in flexion with examiner 2 and hamstring test. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in relation to the following parameters: goniometer in extension with examiner 1, goniometer in extension with examiner 2 and popliteal angle test. Conclusion: Individuals who practiced sports presented higher trunk flexion values. The use of goniometry to measure trunk amplitude showed variations in measurements between the examiners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4799100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47991002016-03-28 A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LUMBAR RANGE OF MOVEMENT IN HEALTHY ATHLETES AND NON-ATHLETES Chertman, Carla Campoy dos Santos, Humberto Maldonado Pires, Leonardo Wajchenberg, Marcelo Martins, Delio Eulúlio Puertas, Eduardo Barros Rev Bras Ortop Original Article Objective: To compare the amplitude of trunk flexion and extension through goniometry among athletes and non-athletes and to correlate these data with the popliteal angle and hamstring muscle tests. Methods: The amplitude of trunk flexion and extension was evaluated in 50 individuals who practiced sports on a regular basis and 50 non-athletes who did not present any painful lumber symptoms or any symptoms that could affect test performance. The measurements were made consecutively by two independent examiners by means of goniometry. The trunk flexion and extension values from the goniometry evaluation were correlated with the popliteal angle and hamstring flexibility tests, and the statistical correlation between them was analyzed. Results: The mean values obtained were 130.7 (101.9) for flexion and 40.2 (36.4) for extension. Statistically significant differences between the athletes and non-athletes were found in relation to the following parameters: goniometer in flexion with examiner 1, goniometer in flexion with examiner 2 and hamstring test. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in relation to the following parameters: goniometer in extension with examiner 1, goniometer in extension with examiner 2 and popliteal angle test. Conclusion: Individuals who practiced sports presented higher trunk flexion values. The use of goniometry to measure trunk amplitude showed variations in measurements between the examiners. Elsevier 2015-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4799100/ /pubmed/27022568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30385-2 Text en © 2010 Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Chertman, Carla
Campoy dos Santos, Humberto Maldonado
Pires, Leonardo
Wajchenberg, Marcelo
Martins, Delio Eulúlio
Puertas, Eduardo Barros
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LUMBAR RANGE OF MOVEMENT IN HEALTHY ATHLETES AND NON-ATHLETES
title A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LUMBAR RANGE OF MOVEMENT IN HEALTHY ATHLETES AND NON-ATHLETES
title_full A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LUMBAR RANGE OF MOVEMENT IN HEALTHY ATHLETES AND NON-ATHLETES
title_fullStr A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LUMBAR RANGE OF MOVEMENT IN HEALTHY ATHLETES AND NON-ATHLETES
title_full_unstemmed A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LUMBAR RANGE OF MOVEMENT IN HEALTHY ATHLETES AND NON-ATHLETES
title_short A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LUMBAR RANGE OF MOVEMENT IN HEALTHY ATHLETES AND NON-ATHLETES
title_sort comparative study of lumbar range of movement in healthy athletes and non-athletes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4799100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27022568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30385-2
work_keys_str_mv AT chertmancarla acomparativestudyoflumbarrangeofmovementinhealthyathletesandnonathletes
AT campoydossantoshumbertomaldonado acomparativestudyoflumbarrangeofmovementinhealthyathletesandnonathletes
AT piresleonardo acomparativestudyoflumbarrangeofmovementinhealthyathletesandnonathletes
AT wajchenbergmarcelo acomparativestudyoflumbarrangeofmovementinhealthyathletesandnonathletes
AT martinsdelioeululio acomparativestudyoflumbarrangeofmovementinhealthyathletesandnonathletes
AT puertaseduardobarros acomparativestudyoflumbarrangeofmovementinhealthyathletesandnonathletes
AT chertmancarla comparativestudyoflumbarrangeofmovementinhealthyathletesandnonathletes
AT campoydossantoshumbertomaldonado comparativestudyoflumbarrangeofmovementinhealthyathletesandnonathletes
AT piresleonardo comparativestudyoflumbarrangeofmovementinhealthyathletesandnonathletes
AT wajchenbergmarcelo comparativestudyoflumbarrangeofmovementinhealthyathletesandnonathletes
AT martinsdelioeululio comparativestudyoflumbarrangeofmovementinhealthyathletesandnonathletes
AT puertaseduardobarros comparativestudyoflumbarrangeofmovementinhealthyathletesandnonathletes