Cargando…

Genetic Counselors’ Perspectives and Practices Regarding Expanded Carrier Screening after Initial Clinical Availability

Expanded carrier screening (ECS), introduced in 2009, identifies carriers for dozens or hundreds of recessive diseases. At the time of its introduction into clinical use, perspectives of the genetic counseling community regarding ECS were unknown. We conducted a survey in early 2012 of GCs and repor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lazarin, Gabriel A., Detweiler, Stacey, Nazareth, Shivani B., Ashkinadze, Elena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4799270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26354338
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9881-1
_version_ 1782422310851969024
author Lazarin, Gabriel A.
Detweiler, Stacey
Nazareth, Shivani B.
Ashkinadze, Elena
author_facet Lazarin, Gabriel A.
Detweiler, Stacey
Nazareth, Shivani B.
Ashkinadze, Elena
author_sort Lazarin, Gabriel A.
collection PubMed
description Expanded carrier screening (ECS), introduced in 2009, identifies carriers for dozens or hundreds of recessive diseases. At the time of its introduction into clinical use, perspectives of the genetic counseling community regarding ECS were unknown. We conducted a survey in early 2012 of GCs and report the results here. They represent a snapshot of opinions and usage at that time, providing a baseline for comparison as the technology continues to evolve and as usage increases. The survey assessed personal perspectives, opinions on clinical implementation and clinical utilization of ECS. The sample included 337 GCs of varying clinical fields, of whom 150 reported practicing in reproductive settings. Our findings demonstrate that, at the time, GCs indicated general agreement with ECS as a concept – for example, most GCs agreed that carrier screening should address diseases outside of current guidelines and also indicated personal interest in electing ECS. There were also disagreements or concerns expressed regarding appropriate pre- and post-test counseling (e.g., the content and delivery mode of adequate informed consent) and practical implementation (e.g., the amount of time available for follow-up care). This was the first quantitative study of a large number of GCs and it revealed initial overall support for ECS among the GC profession. The authors plan to re-administer a similar survey, which may reveal changes in opinions and/or utilization over time. A follow up survey would also allow further exploration of questions uncovered by these data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4799270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47992702016-04-06 Genetic Counselors’ Perspectives and Practices Regarding Expanded Carrier Screening after Initial Clinical Availability Lazarin, Gabriel A. Detweiler, Stacey Nazareth, Shivani B. Ashkinadze, Elena J Genet Couns Original Research Expanded carrier screening (ECS), introduced in 2009, identifies carriers for dozens or hundreds of recessive diseases. At the time of its introduction into clinical use, perspectives of the genetic counseling community regarding ECS were unknown. We conducted a survey in early 2012 of GCs and report the results here. They represent a snapshot of opinions and usage at that time, providing a baseline for comparison as the technology continues to evolve and as usage increases. The survey assessed personal perspectives, opinions on clinical implementation and clinical utilization of ECS. The sample included 337 GCs of varying clinical fields, of whom 150 reported practicing in reproductive settings. Our findings demonstrate that, at the time, GCs indicated general agreement with ECS as a concept – for example, most GCs agreed that carrier screening should address diseases outside of current guidelines and also indicated personal interest in electing ECS. There were also disagreements or concerns expressed regarding appropriate pre- and post-test counseling (e.g., the content and delivery mode of adequate informed consent) and practical implementation (e.g., the amount of time available for follow-up care). This was the first quantitative study of a large number of GCs and it revealed initial overall support for ECS among the GC profession. The authors plan to re-administer a similar survey, which may reveal changes in opinions and/or utilization over time. A follow up survey would also allow further exploration of questions uncovered by these data. Springer US 2016-04-01 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4799270/ /pubmed/26354338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9881-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Lazarin, Gabriel A.
Detweiler, Stacey
Nazareth, Shivani B.
Ashkinadze, Elena
Genetic Counselors’ Perspectives and Practices Regarding Expanded Carrier Screening after Initial Clinical Availability
title Genetic Counselors’ Perspectives and Practices Regarding Expanded Carrier Screening after Initial Clinical Availability
title_full Genetic Counselors’ Perspectives and Practices Regarding Expanded Carrier Screening after Initial Clinical Availability
title_fullStr Genetic Counselors’ Perspectives and Practices Regarding Expanded Carrier Screening after Initial Clinical Availability
title_full_unstemmed Genetic Counselors’ Perspectives and Practices Regarding Expanded Carrier Screening after Initial Clinical Availability
title_short Genetic Counselors’ Perspectives and Practices Regarding Expanded Carrier Screening after Initial Clinical Availability
title_sort genetic counselors’ perspectives and practices regarding expanded carrier screening after initial clinical availability
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4799270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26354338
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9881-1
work_keys_str_mv AT lazaringabriela geneticcounselorsperspectivesandpracticesregardingexpandedcarrierscreeningafterinitialclinicalavailability
AT detweilerstacey geneticcounselorsperspectivesandpracticesregardingexpandedcarrierscreeningafterinitialclinicalavailability
AT nazarethshivanib geneticcounselorsperspectivesandpracticesregardingexpandedcarrierscreeningafterinitialclinicalavailability
AT ashkinadzeelena geneticcounselorsperspectivesandpracticesregardingexpandedcarrierscreeningafterinitialclinicalavailability