Cargando…
RESULTS FROM BI-CONTACT(®) TOTAL ELBOW ARTHROPLASTY: MULTICENTER STUDY
Objective: To describe the initial experience of four orthopedic clinics from using Bi-Contact(®) total elbow arthroplasty (TEA), reporting the results and complications of the procedure. Methods: This was a retrospective study, through analysis on the medical records of patients who underwent prima...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4799294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27027055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30413-4 |
_version_ | 1782422315799150592 |
---|---|
author | Benegas, Eduardo Malavolta, Eduardo Angeli Gracitelli, Mauro Emilio Conforto de Sousa, Augusto Tadeu Barros Miyazaki, Alberto Naoki Fregoneze, Marcelo Ikemoto, Roberto Yukio Murachovsky, Joel Matsumoto, Marcelo Hide Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara Neto, Arnaldo Amado Ferreira |
author_facet | Benegas, Eduardo Malavolta, Eduardo Angeli Gracitelli, Mauro Emilio Conforto de Sousa, Augusto Tadeu Barros Miyazaki, Alberto Naoki Fregoneze, Marcelo Ikemoto, Roberto Yukio Murachovsky, Joel Matsumoto, Marcelo Hide Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara Neto, Arnaldo Amado Ferreira |
author_sort | Benegas, Eduardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To describe the initial experience of four orthopedic clinics from using Bi-Contact(®) total elbow arthroplasty (TEA), reporting the results and complications of the procedure. Methods: This was a retrospective study, through analysis on the medical records of patients who underwent primary TEA using a prosthesis model developed in conjunction with IOT-HCFMUSP. Forty-six elbows (45 patients) that were operated at four orthopedic clinics between 2000 and 2009 were evaluated. Results: The majority of the patients were female (74%), and the median age was 62.5 years. The diagnoses encountered were trauma sequelae (47.83%), rheumatoid arthritis (32.61%), primary osteoarthrosis (8.7%), acute fractures (6.52%) and heterotopic ossification (2.17%). The median length of follow-up was 2.08 years (0.25-9). The procedure significantly alleviated pain and improved range of motion. It was observed that at least one complication was present in 69.57% of the cases, and the main ones were infection (28.26%), need for revision (28.26%), intraoperative fracture (15.22%) and aseptic loosening (15.22%). Conclusion: Bi-Contact(®) TEA provided significant alleviation of pain and improvement of range of motion in the present series. The complication rate was high, and the most frequently observed complications were infection, aseptic loosening and intraoperative fracture. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4799294 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47992942016-03-29 RESULTS FROM BI-CONTACT(®) TOTAL ELBOW ARTHROPLASTY: MULTICENTER STUDY Benegas, Eduardo Malavolta, Eduardo Angeli Gracitelli, Mauro Emilio Conforto de Sousa, Augusto Tadeu Barros Miyazaki, Alberto Naoki Fregoneze, Marcelo Ikemoto, Roberto Yukio Murachovsky, Joel Matsumoto, Marcelo Hide Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara Neto, Arnaldo Amado Ferreira Rev Bras Ortop Original Article Objective: To describe the initial experience of four orthopedic clinics from using Bi-Contact(®) total elbow arthroplasty (TEA), reporting the results and complications of the procedure. Methods: This was a retrospective study, through analysis on the medical records of patients who underwent primary TEA using a prosthesis model developed in conjunction with IOT-HCFMUSP. Forty-six elbows (45 patients) that were operated at four orthopedic clinics between 2000 and 2009 were evaluated. Results: The majority of the patients were female (74%), and the median age was 62.5 years. The diagnoses encountered were trauma sequelae (47.83%), rheumatoid arthritis (32.61%), primary osteoarthrosis (8.7%), acute fractures (6.52%) and heterotopic ossification (2.17%). The median length of follow-up was 2.08 years (0.25-9). The procedure significantly alleviated pain and improved range of motion. It was observed that at least one complication was present in 69.57% of the cases, and the main ones were infection (28.26%), need for revision (28.26%), intraoperative fracture (15.22%) and aseptic loosening (15.22%). Conclusion: Bi-Contact(®) TEA provided significant alleviation of pain and improvement of range of motion in the present series. The complication rate was high, and the most frequently observed complications were infection, aseptic loosening and intraoperative fracture. Elsevier 2015-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4799294/ /pubmed/27027055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30413-4 Text en © 2011 Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Benegas, Eduardo Malavolta, Eduardo Angeli Gracitelli, Mauro Emilio Conforto de Sousa, Augusto Tadeu Barros Miyazaki, Alberto Naoki Fregoneze, Marcelo Ikemoto, Roberto Yukio Murachovsky, Joel Matsumoto, Marcelo Hide Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara Neto, Arnaldo Amado Ferreira RESULTS FROM BI-CONTACT(®) TOTAL ELBOW ARTHROPLASTY: MULTICENTER STUDY |
title | RESULTS FROM BI-CONTACT(®) TOTAL ELBOW ARTHROPLASTY: MULTICENTER STUDY |
title_full | RESULTS FROM BI-CONTACT(®) TOTAL ELBOW ARTHROPLASTY: MULTICENTER STUDY |
title_fullStr | RESULTS FROM BI-CONTACT(®) TOTAL ELBOW ARTHROPLASTY: MULTICENTER STUDY |
title_full_unstemmed | RESULTS FROM BI-CONTACT(®) TOTAL ELBOW ARTHROPLASTY: MULTICENTER STUDY |
title_short | RESULTS FROM BI-CONTACT(®) TOTAL ELBOW ARTHROPLASTY: MULTICENTER STUDY |
title_sort | results from bi-contact(®) total elbow arthroplasty: multicenter study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4799294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27027055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30413-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benegaseduardo resultsfrombicontacttotalelbowarthroplastymulticenterstudy AT malavoltaeduardoangeli resultsfrombicontacttotalelbowarthroplastymulticenterstudy AT gracitellimauroemilioconforto resultsfrombicontacttotalelbowarthroplastymulticenterstudy AT desousaaugustotadeubarros resultsfrombicontacttotalelbowarthroplastymulticenterstudy AT miyazakialbertonaoki resultsfrombicontacttotalelbowarthroplastymulticenterstudy AT fregonezemarcelo resultsfrombicontacttotalelbowarthroplastymulticenterstudy AT ikemotorobertoyukio resultsfrombicontacttotalelbowarthroplastymulticenterstudy AT murachovskyjoel resultsfrombicontacttotalelbowarthroplastymulticenterstudy AT matsumotomarcelohide resultsfrombicontacttotalelbowarthroplastymulticenterstudy AT tamaokimarceljunsugawara resultsfrombicontacttotalelbowarthroplastymulticenterstudy AT netoarnaldoamadoferreira resultsfrombicontacttotalelbowarthroplastymulticenterstudy |