Cargando…

EVALUATION OF METATARSAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THE BIOMECHANICS OF 332 NORMAL FEET USING THE METHOD OF MEASURING RELATIVE LENGTHS

To identify the mean normal length of the metatarsals and the most common metatarsal formulas through a simple measurement method, thereby providing surgeons with data for planning treatment on symptomatic individuals with biometric abnormalities of the foot. Methods: We evaluated and measured dorso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barrôco, Rui, Nery, Caio, Favero, Gabriela, Mombach, Renan, Nascimento, Oswaldo, Jorge, Silvia, Monteiro, Marina, Diedrichs, Letícia, Abreu, Felipe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4799308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27027034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30258-5
_version_ 1782422318909227008
author Barrôco, Rui
Nery, Caio
Favero, Gabriela
Mombach, Renan
Nascimento, Oswaldo
Jorge, Silvia
Monteiro, Marina
Diedrichs, Letícia
Abreu, Felipe
author_facet Barrôco, Rui
Nery, Caio
Favero, Gabriela
Mombach, Renan
Nascimento, Oswaldo
Jorge, Silvia
Monteiro, Marina
Diedrichs, Letícia
Abreu, Felipe
author_sort Barrôco, Rui
collection PubMed
description To identify the mean normal length of the metatarsals and the most common metatarsal formulas through a simple measurement method, thereby providing surgeons with data for planning treatment on symptomatic individuals with biometric abnormalities of the foot. Methods: We evaluated and measured dorsoplantar weight-bearing radiographs of normal adult feet (83 males and 83 females). Results: We found relative mean lengths for metatarsus I of 125.4 mm for males and 115.1 mm for females; for metatarsus II, 127.8 mm for males and 117.3 mm for females; for metatarsus III, 123.4 mm for males and 113.5 mm for females; for metatarsus IV, 114.2 mm for males and 105.3 mm for females; for metatarsus V, 99.5 mm for males and 91.7 mm for females. The mean forefoot width was 87.1 mm for males and 80.8 mm for females. Conclusion: Feet with index minus occurred most frequently in both sexes, although all three metatarsal formulas can be considered to be normal patterns. The mean normal pattern for males and females respectively was the following: metatarsus I 2.4 mm and 2.2 mm shorter than metatarsus II; metatarsus III 4.4 mm and 3.8 mm shorter than metatarsus II; metatarsus IV 9.2 mm and 8.2 mm shorter than metatarsus III; metatarsus V 14.7 mm and 13.6 mm shorter than metatarsus IV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4799308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47993082016-03-29 EVALUATION OF METATARSAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THE BIOMECHANICS OF 332 NORMAL FEET USING THE METHOD OF MEASURING RELATIVE LENGTHS Barrôco, Rui Nery, Caio Favero, Gabriela Mombach, Renan Nascimento, Oswaldo Jorge, Silvia Monteiro, Marina Diedrichs, Letícia Abreu, Felipe Rev Bras Ortop Original Article To identify the mean normal length of the metatarsals and the most common metatarsal formulas through a simple measurement method, thereby providing surgeons with data for planning treatment on symptomatic individuals with biometric abnormalities of the foot. Methods: We evaluated and measured dorsoplantar weight-bearing radiographs of normal adult feet (83 males and 83 females). Results: We found relative mean lengths for metatarsus I of 125.4 mm for males and 115.1 mm for females; for metatarsus II, 127.8 mm for males and 117.3 mm for females; for metatarsus III, 123.4 mm for males and 113.5 mm for females; for metatarsus IV, 114.2 mm for males and 105.3 mm for females; for metatarsus V, 99.5 mm for males and 91.7 mm for females. The mean forefoot width was 87.1 mm for males and 80.8 mm for females. Conclusion: Feet with index minus occurred most frequently in both sexes, although all three metatarsal formulas can be considered to be normal patterns. The mean normal pattern for males and females respectively was the following: metatarsus I 2.4 mm and 2.2 mm shorter than metatarsus II; metatarsus III 4.4 mm and 3.8 mm shorter than metatarsus II; metatarsus IV 9.2 mm and 8.2 mm shorter than metatarsus III; metatarsus V 14.7 mm and 13.6 mm shorter than metatarsus IV. Elsevier 2015-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4799308/ /pubmed/27027034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30258-5 Text en © 2011 Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Barrôco, Rui
Nery, Caio
Favero, Gabriela
Mombach, Renan
Nascimento, Oswaldo
Jorge, Silvia
Monteiro, Marina
Diedrichs, Letícia
Abreu, Felipe
EVALUATION OF METATARSAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THE BIOMECHANICS OF 332 NORMAL FEET USING THE METHOD OF MEASURING RELATIVE LENGTHS
title EVALUATION OF METATARSAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THE BIOMECHANICS OF 332 NORMAL FEET USING THE METHOD OF MEASURING RELATIVE LENGTHS
title_full EVALUATION OF METATARSAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THE BIOMECHANICS OF 332 NORMAL FEET USING THE METHOD OF MEASURING RELATIVE LENGTHS
title_fullStr EVALUATION OF METATARSAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THE BIOMECHANICS OF 332 NORMAL FEET USING THE METHOD OF MEASURING RELATIVE LENGTHS
title_full_unstemmed EVALUATION OF METATARSAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THE BIOMECHANICS OF 332 NORMAL FEET USING THE METHOD OF MEASURING RELATIVE LENGTHS
title_short EVALUATION OF METATARSAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THE BIOMECHANICS OF 332 NORMAL FEET USING THE METHOD OF MEASURING RELATIVE LENGTHS
title_sort evaluation of metatarsal relationships in the biomechanics of 332 normal feet using the method of measuring relative lengths
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4799308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27027034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30258-5
work_keys_str_mv AT barrocorui evaluationofmetatarsalrelationshipsinthebiomechanicsof332normalfeetusingthemethodofmeasuringrelativelengths
AT nerycaio evaluationofmetatarsalrelationshipsinthebiomechanicsof332normalfeetusingthemethodofmeasuringrelativelengths
AT faverogabriela evaluationofmetatarsalrelationshipsinthebiomechanicsof332normalfeetusingthemethodofmeasuringrelativelengths
AT mombachrenan evaluationofmetatarsalrelationshipsinthebiomechanicsof332normalfeetusingthemethodofmeasuringrelativelengths
AT nascimentooswaldo evaluationofmetatarsalrelationshipsinthebiomechanicsof332normalfeetusingthemethodofmeasuringrelativelengths
AT jorgesilvia evaluationofmetatarsalrelationshipsinthebiomechanicsof332normalfeetusingthemethodofmeasuringrelativelengths
AT monteiromarina evaluationofmetatarsalrelationshipsinthebiomechanicsof332normalfeetusingthemethodofmeasuringrelativelengths
AT diedrichsleticia evaluationofmetatarsalrelationshipsinthebiomechanicsof332normalfeetusingthemethodofmeasuringrelativelengths
AT abreufelipe evaluationofmetatarsalrelationshipsinthebiomechanicsof332normalfeetusingthemethodofmeasuringrelativelengths