Cargando…
EVALUATION OF METATARSAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THE BIOMECHANICS OF 332 NORMAL FEET USING THE METHOD OF MEASURING RELATIVE LENGTHS
To identify the mean normal length of the metatarsals and the most common metatarsal formulas through a simple measurement method, thereby providing surgeons with data for planning treatment on symptomatic individuals with biometric abnormalities of the foot. Methods: We evaluated and measured dorso...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4799308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27027034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30258-5 |
_version_ | 1782422318909227008 |
---|---|
author | Barrôco, Rui Nery, Caio Favero, Gabriela Mombach, Renan Nascimento, Oswaldo Jorge, Silvia Monteiro, Marina Diedrichs, Letícia Abreu, Felipe |
author_facet | Barrôco, Rui Nery, Caio Favero, Gabriela Mombach, Renan Nascimento, Oswaldo Jorge, Silvia Monteiro, Marina Diedrichs, Letícia Abreu, Felipe |
author_sort | Barrôco, Rui |
collection | PubMed |
description | To identify the mean normal length of the metatarsals and the most common metatarsal formulas through a simple measurement method, thereby providing surgeons with data for planning treatment on symptomatic individuals with biometric abnormalities of the foot. Methods: We evaluated and measured dorsoplantar weight-bearing radiographs of normal adult feet (83 males and 83 females). Results: We found relative mean lengths for metatarsus I of 125.4 mm for males and 115.1 mm for females; for metatarsus II, 127.8 mm for males and 117.3 mm for females; for metatarsus III, 123.4 mm for males and 113.5 mm for females; for metatarsus IV, 114.2 mm for males and 105.3 mm for females; for metatarsus V, 99.5 mm for males and 91.7 mm for females. The mean forefoot width was 87.1 mm for males and 80.8 mm for females. Conclusion: Feet with index minus occurred most frequently in both sexes, although all three metatarsal formulas can be considered to be normal patterns. The mean normal pattern for males and females respectively was the following: metatarsus I 2.4 mm and 2.2 mm shorter than metatarsus II; metatarsus III 4.4 mm and 3.8 mm shorter than metatarsus II; metatarsus IV 9.2 mm and 8.2 mm shorter than metatarsus III; metatarsus V 14.7 mm and 13.6 mm shorter than metatarsus IV. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4799308 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47993082016-03-29 EVALUATION OF METATARSAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THE BIOMECHANICS OF 332 NORMAL FEET USING THE METHOD OF MEASURING RELATIVE LENGTHS Barrôco, Rui Nery, Caio Favero, Gabriela Mombach, Renan Nascimento, Oswaldo Jorge, Silvia Monteiro, Marina Diedrichs, Letícia Abreu, Felipe Rev Bras Ortop Original Article To identify the mean normal length of the metatarsals and the most common metatarsal formulas through a simple measurement method, thereby providing surgeons with data for planning treatment on symptomatic individuals with biometric abnormalities of the foot. Methods: We evaluated and measured dorsoplantar weight-bearing radiographs of normal adult feet (83 males and 83 females). Results: We found relative mean lengths for metatarsus I of 125.4 mm for males and 115.1 mm for females; for metatarsus II, 127.8 mm for males and 117.3 mm for females; for metatarsus III, 123.4 mm for males and 113.5 mm for females; for metatarsus IV, 114.2 mm for males and 105.3 mm for females; for metatarsus V, 99.5 mm for males and 91.7 mm for females. The mean forefoot width was 87.1 mm for males and 80.8 mm for females. Conclusion: Feet with index minus occurred most frequently in both sexes, although all three metatarsal formulas can be considered to be normal patterns. The mean normal pattern for males and females respectively was the following: metatarsus I 2.4 mm and 2.2 mm shorter than metatarsus II; metatarsus III 4.4 mm and 3.8 mm shorter than metatarsus II; metatarsus IV 9.2 mm and 8.2 mm shorter than metatarsus III; metatarsus V 14.7 mm and 13.6 mm shorter than metatarsus IV. Elsevier 2015-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4799308/ /pubmed/27027034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30258-5 Text en © 2011 Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Barrôco, Rui Nery, Caio Favero, Gabriela Mombach, Renan Nascimento, Oswaldo Jorge, Silvia Monteiro, Marina Diedrichs, Letícia Abreu, Felipe EVALUATION OF METATARSAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THE BIOMECHANICS OF 332 NORMAL FEET USING THE METHOD OF MEASURING RELATIVE LENGTHS |
title | EVALUATION OF METATARSAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THE BIOMECHANICS OF 332 NORMAL FEET USING THE METHOD OF MEASURING RELATIVE LENGTHS |
title_full | EVALUATION OF METATARSAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THE BIOMECHANICS OF 332 NORMAL FEET USING THE METHOD OF MEASURING RELATIVE LENGTHS |
title_fullStr | EVALUATION OF METATARSAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THE BIOMECHANICS OF 332 NORMAL FEET USING THE METHOD OF MEASURING RELATIVE LENGTHS |
title_full_unstemmed | EVALUATION OF METATARSAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THE BIOMECHANICS OF 332 NORMAL FEET USING THE METHOD OF MEASURING RELATIVE LENGTHS |
title_short | EVALUATION OF METATARSAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THE BIOMECHANICS OF 332 NORMAL FEET USING THE METHOD OF MEASURING RELATIVE LENGTHS |
title_sort | evaluation of metatarsal relationships in the biomechanics of 332 normal feet using the method of measuring relative lengths |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4799308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27027034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30258-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barrocorui evaluationofmetatarsalrelationshipsinthebiomechanicsof332normalfeetusingthemethodofmeasuringrelativelengths AT nerycaio evaluationofmetatarsalrelationshipsinthebiomechanicsof332normalfeetusingthemethodofmeasuringrelativelengths AT faverogabriela evaluationofmetatarsalrelationshipsinthebiomechanicsof332normalfeetusingthemethodofmeasuringrelativelengths AT mombachrenan evaluationofmetatarsalrelationshipsinthebiomechanicsof332normalfeetusingthemethodofmeasuringrelativelengths AT nascimentooswaldo evaluationofmetatarsalrelationshipsinthebiomechanicsof332normalfeetusingthemethodofmeasuringrelativelengths AT jorgesilvia evaluationofmetatarsalrelationshipsinthebiomechanicsof332normalfeetusingthemethodofmeasuringrelativelengths AT monteiromarina evaluationofmetatarsalrelationshipsinthebiomechanicsof332normalfeetusingthemethodofmeasuringrelativelengths AT diedrichsleticia evaluationofmetatarsalrelationshipsinthebiomechanicsof332normalfeetusingthemethodofmeasuringrelativelengths AT abreufelipe evaluationofmetatarsalrelationshipsinthebiomechanicsof332normalfeetusingthemethodofmeasuringrelativelengths |