Cargando…
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON USE OF PLATELET-RICH PLASMA ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH ALPHA-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE CEMENT FOR BONE REPAIR IN RATS
Objectives: To evaluate the effect of alpha-tricalcium phosphate (α-TCP) cement combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on osteogenesis, and to compare the results with use of PRP alone. Methods: A bilateral defect was produced in rat femurs and was filled with one of two types of treatments (PRP o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4799469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27047859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30137-3 |
_version_ | 1782422355040010240 |
---|---|
author | Sebben, Alessandra Deise Hoff, Gabriela Klein, Caroline Peres Freitas, Thiago Alexi de Assad, Camilla Santos, Luís Alberto dos Silva, Jefferson Braga |
author_facet | Sebben, Alessandra Deise Hoff, Gabriela Klein, Caroline Peres Freitas, Thiago Alexi de Assad, Camilla Santos, Luís Alberto dos Silva, Jefferson Braga |
author_sort | Sebben, Alessandra Deise |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives: To evaluate the effect of alpha-tricalcium phosphate (α-TCP) cement combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on osteogenesis, and to compare the results with use of PRP alone. Methods: A bilateral defect was produced in rat femurs and was filled with one of two types of treatments (PRP or α-TCP + PRP). The outcomes were evaluated after four and eight weeks. Radiographic images provided values for the lesion area, and histology (picrosirius staining) indicated the area of new bone formation. Results: The means relating to the lesion area of the α-TCP + PRP group (2.64 ± 2.07 and 1.91 ± 0.93 mm(2), after four and eight weeks, respectively) showed numerically better but non-significant results (p > 0.05) than those seen in the PRP group (5.59 mm 2 ± 2.69 and 3.23 ± 1.46 mm 2, after four and eight weeks, respectively). The mean new bone formation rates were 62.7% ± 12.1 and 79.01% ± 6.25 in the PRP group, and 73.3% ± 12.7 and 85.86% ± 10.45 in α-TCP + PRP group, after four and eight weeks, respectively (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The data from this study suggest that treatment with α-TCP cement combined with PRP does not show any significant difference in comparison with PRP alone. However, there is a possible early effect on bone regeneration when the two biomaterials are applied together. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4799469 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47994692016-04-04 COMPARATIVE STUDY ON USE OF PLATELET-RICH PLASMA ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH ALPHA-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE CEMENT FOR BONE REPAIR IN RATS Sebben, Alessandra Deise Hoff, Gabriela Klein, Caroline Peres Freitas, Thiago Alexi de Assad, Camilla Santos, Luís Alberto dos Silva, Jefferson Braga Rev Bras Ortop Original Article Objectives: To evaluate the effect of alpha-tricalcium phosphate (α-TCP) cement combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on osteogenesis, and to compare the results with use of PRP alone. Methods: A bilateral defect was produced in rat femurs and was filled with one of two types of treatments (PRP or α-TCP + PRP). The outcomes were evaluated after four and eight weeks. Radiographic images provided values for the lesion area, and histology (picrosirius staining) indicated the area of new bone formation. Results: The means relating to the lesion area of the α-TCP + PRP group (2.64 ± 2.07 and 1.91 ± 0.93 mm(2), after four and eight weeks, respectively) showed numerically better but non-significant results (p > 0.05) than those seen in the PRP group (5.59 mm 2 ± 2.69 and 3.23 ± 1.46 mm 2, after four and eight weeks, respectively). The mean new bone formation rates were 62.7% ± 12.1 and 79.01% ± 6.25 in the PRP group, and 73.3% ± 12.7 and 85.86% ± 10.45 in α-TCP + PRP group, after four and eight weeks, respectively (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The data from this study suggest that treatment with α-TCP cement combined with PRP does not show any significant difference in comparison with PRP alone. However, there is a possible early effect on bone regeneration when the two biomaterials are applied together. Elsevier 2015-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4799469/ /pubmed/27047859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30137-3 Text en © 2012 Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sebben, Alessandra Deise Hoff, Gabriela Klein, Caroline Peres Freitas, Thiago Alexi de Assad, Camilla Santos, Luís Alberto dos Silva, Jefferson Braga COMPARATIVE STUDY ON USE OF PLATELET-RICH PLASMA ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH ALPHA-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE CEMENT FOR BONE REPAIR IN RATS |
title | COMPARATIVE STUDY ON USE OF PLATELET-RICH PLASMA ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH ALPHA-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE CEMENT FOR BONE REPAIR IN RATS |
title_full | COMPARATIVE STUDY ON USE OF PLATELET-RICH PLASMA ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH ALPHA-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE CEMENT FOR BONE REPAIR IN RATS |
title_fullStr | COMPARATIVE STUDY ON USE OF PLATELET-RICH PLASMA ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH ALPHA-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE CEMENT FOR BONE REPAIR IN RATS |
title_full_unstemmed | COMPARATIVE STUDY ON USE OF PLATELET-RICH PLASMA ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH ALPHA-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE CEMENT FOR BONE REPAIR IN RATS |
title_short | COMPARATIVE STUDY ON USE OF PLATELET-RICH PLASMA ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH ALPHA-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE CEMENT FOR BONE REPAIR IN RATS |
title_sort | comparative study on use of platelet-rich plasma alone and in combination with alpha-tricalcium phosphate cement for bone repair in rats |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4799469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27047859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30137-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sebbenalessandradeise comparativestudyonuseofplateletrichplasmaaloneandincombinationwithalphatricalciumphosphatecementforbonerepairinrats AT hoffgabriela comparativestudyonuseofplateletrichplasmaaloneandincombinationwithalphatricalciumphosphatecementforbonerepairinrats AT kleincarolineperes comparativestudyonuseofplateletrichplasmaaloneandincombinationwithalphatricalciumphosphatecementforbonerepairinrats AT freitasthiagoalexide comparativestudyonuseofplateletrichplasmaaloneandincombinationwithalphatricalciumphosphatecementforbonerepairinrats AT assadcamilla comparativestudyonuseofplateletrichplasmaaloneandincombinationwithalphatricalciumphosphatecementforbonerepairinrats AT santosluisalbertodos comparativestudyonuseofplateletrichplasmaaloneandincombinationwithalphatricalciumphosphatecementforbonerepairinrats AT silvajeffersonbraga comparativestudyonuseofplateletrichplasmaaloneandincombinationwithalphatricalciumphosphatecementforbonerepairinrats |