Cargando…

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON USE OF PLATELET-RICH PLASMA ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH ALPHA-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE CEMENT FOR BONE REPAIR IN RATS

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of alpha-tricalcium phosphate (α-TCP) cement combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on osteogenesis, and to compare the results with use of PRP alone. Methods: A bilateral defect was produced in rat femurs and was filled with one of two types of treatments (PRP o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sebben, Alessandra Deise, Hoff, Gabriela, Klein, Caroline Peres, Freitas, Thiago Alexi de, Assad, Camilla, Santos, Luís Alberto dos, Silva, Jefferson Braga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4799469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27047859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30137-3
_version_ 1782422355040010240
author Sebben, Alessandra Deise
Hoff, Gabriela
Klein, Caroline Peres
Freitas, Thiago Alexi de
Assad, Camilla
Santos, Luís Alberto dos
Silva, Jefferson Braga
author_facet Sebben, Alessandra Deise
Hoff, Gabriela
Klein, Caroline Peres
Freitas, Thiago Alexi de
Assad, Camilla
Santos, Luís Alberto dos
Silva, Jefferson Braga
author_sort Sebben, Alessandra Deise
collection PubMed
description Objectives: To evaluate the effect of alpha-tricalcium phosphate (α-TCP) cement combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on osteogenesis, and to compare the results with use of PRP alone. Methods: A bilateral defect was produced in rat femurs and was filled with one of two types of treatments (PRP or α-TCP + PRP). The outcomes were evaluated after four and eight weeks. Radiographic images provided values for the lesion area, and histology (picrosirius staining) indicated the area of new bone formation. Results: The means relating to the lesion area of the α-TCP + PRP group (2.64 ± 2.07 and 1.91 ± 0.93 mm(2), after four and eight weeks, respectively) showed numerically better but non-significant results (p > 0.05) than those seen in the PRP group (5.59 mm 2 ± 2.69 and 3.23 ± 1.46 mm 2, after four and eight weeks, respectively). The mean new bone formation rates were 62.7% ± 12.1 and 79.01% ± 6.25 in the PRP group, and 73.3% ± 12.7 and 85.86% ± 10.45 in α-TCP + PRP group, after four and eight weeks, respectively (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The data from this study suggest that treatment with α-TCP cement combined with PRP does not show any significant difference in comparison with PRP alone. However, there is a possible early effect on bone regeneration when the two biomaterials are applied together.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4799469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47994692016-04-04 COMPARATIVE STUDY ON USE OF PLATELET-RICH PLASMA ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH ALPHA-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE CEMENT FOR BONE REPAIR IN RATS Sebben, Alessandra Deise Hoff, Gabriela Klein, Caroline Peres Freitas, Thiago Alexi de Assad, Camilla Santos, Luís Alberto dos Silva, Jefferson Braga Rev Bras Ortop Original Article Objectives: To evaluate the effect of alpha-tricalcium phosphate (α-TCP) cement combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on osteogenesis, and to compare the results with use of PRP alone. Methods: A bilateral defect was produced in rat femurs and was filled with one of two types of treatments (PRP or α-TCP + PRP). The outcomes were evaluated after four and eight weeks. Radiographic images provided values for the lesion area, and histology (picrosirius staining) indicated the area of new bone formation. Results: The means relating to the lesion area of the α-TCP + PRP group (2.64 ± 2.07 and 1.91 ± 0.93 mm(2), after four and eight weeks, respectively) showed numerically better but non-significant results (p > 0.05) than those seen in the PRP group (5.59 mm 2 ± 2.69 and 3.23 ± 1.46 mm 2, after four and eight weeks, respectively). The mean new bone formation rates were 62.7% ± 12.1 and 79.01% ± 6.25 in the PRP group, and 73.3% ± 12.7 and 85.86% ± 10.45 in α-TCP + PRP group, after four and eight weeks, respectively (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The data from this study suggest that treatment with α-TCP cement combined with PRP does not show any significant difference in comparison with PRP alone. However, there is a possible early effect on bone regeneration when the two biomaterials are applied together. Elsevier 2015-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4799469/ /pubmed/27047859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30137-3 Text en © 2012 Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Sebben, Alessandra Deise
Hoff, Gabriela
Klein, Caroline Peres
Freitas, Thiago Alexi de
Assad, Camilla
Santos, Luís Alberto dos
Silva, Jefferson Braga
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON USE OF PLATELET-RICH PLASMA ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH ALPHA-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE CEMENT FOR BONE REPAIR IN RATS
title COMPARATIVE STUDY ON USE OF PLATELET-RICH PLASMA ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH ALPHA-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE CEMENT FOR BONE REPAIR IN RATS
title_full COMPARATIVE STUDY ON USE OF PLATELET-RICH PLASMA ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH ALPHA-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE CEMENT FOR BONE REPAIR IN RATS
title_fullStr COMPARATIVE STUDY ON USE OF PLATELET-RICH PLASMA ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH ALPHA-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE CEMENT FOR BONE REPAIR IN RATS
title_full_unstemmed COMPARATIVE STUDY ON USE OF PLATELET-RICH PLASMA ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH ALPHA-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE CEMENT FOR BONE REPAIR IN RATS
title_short COMPARATIVE STUDY ON USE OF PLATELET-RICH PLASMA ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH ALPHA-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE CEMENT FOR BONE REPAIR IN RATS
title_sort comparative study on use of platelet-rich plasma alone and in combination with alpha-tricalcium phosphate cement for bone repair in rats
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4799469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27047859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30137-3
work_keys_str_mv AT sebbenalessandradeise comparativestudyonuseofplateletrichplasmaaloneandincombinationwithalphatricalciumphosphatecementforbonerepairinrats
AT hoffgabriela comparativestudyonuseofplateletrichplasmaaloneandincombinationwithalphatricalciumphosphatecementforbonerepairinrats
AT kleincarolineperes comparativestudyonuseofplateletrichplasmaaloneandincombinationwithalphatricalciumphosphatecementforbonerepairinrats
AT freitasthiagoalexide comparativestudyonuseofplateletrichplasmaaloneandincombinationwithalphatricalciumphosphatecementforbonerepairinrats
AT assadcamilla comparativestudyonuseofplateletrichplasmaaloneandincombinationwithalphatricalciumphosphatecementforbonerepairinrats
AT santosluisalbertodos comparativestudyonuseofplateletrichplasmaaloneandincombinationwithalphatricalciumphosphatecementforbonerepairinrats
AT silvajeffersonbraga comparativestudyonuseofplateletrichplasmaaloneandincombinationwithalphatricalciumphosphatecementforbonerepairinrats