Cargando…
Effectiveness of illness management and recovery (IMR) in the Netherlands: a randomised clinical trial
BACKGROUND: Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) is intended to provide a structured psychosocial programme that helps to manage the disabling effects of severe mental illnesses such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorders. It is curriculum based and aims to improve different aspects of illness mana...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4799598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26995361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0774-0 |
_version_ | 1782422380406112256 |
---|---|
author | Roosenschoon, Bert-Jan Mulder, Cornelis L. Deen, Mathijs L. van Weeghel, Jaap |
author_facet | Roosenschoon, Bert-Jan Mulder, Cornelis L. Deen, Mathijs L. van Weeghel, Jaap |
author_sort | Roosenschoon, Bert-Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) is intended to provide a structured psychosocial programme that helps to manage the disabling effects of severe mental illnesses such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorders. It is curriculum based and aims to improve different aspects of illness management and recovery through interventions such as goal-setting, psycho-education, coping and social skills training. Its overall aim is to improve illness outcomes and support subjective and objective recovery. To date there have been four RCTs on IMR; as these yielded mixed results, further research is needed. Our hypotheses aim to test the interrelatedness assumed in Mueser’s Conceptual Framework for IMR for the many aspects of illness management, illness management outcomes and recovery. METHODS/DESIGN: This randomised multi-centre, single-blinded clinical trial is intended to compare IMR with treatment as usual for 200 outpatient clients with a severe and persistent mental illness (SMI). We will investigate whether IMR leads to better illness management, fewer symptoms and fewer relapses, and also to better subjective and objective recovery. The primary outcome measure is the score on the client version of the Illness Management and Recovery Scale. Secondary outcome measures are the clinician version of the Illness Management and Recovery scale, measures of illness management, coping, symptoms, the number of relapses, and measures of recovery. Measurement will take place before randomisation, and 12 and 18 months after randomisation. DISCUSSION: Overall, our study has the following strengths: 1.) our use of an RCT design in a country where the earlier RCTs on IMR were not conducted; 2.) the fact that participants will consist not only of people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, but also of those with various types of SMI; 3.) our inclusion of 200 participants; and 4.) the fact that we will explore the working mechanisms described in Mueser’s Conceptual Framework for IMR. Finally, 5.) because the RCT will be conducted in everyday clinical practice, we believe that the generalisability of our results will be good. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands National Trial Register (identifier: NTR 5033). Date registered: 13 January 2015. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4799598 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47995982016-03-20 Effectiveness of illness management and recovery (IMR) in the Netherlands: a randomised clinical trial Roosenschoon, Bert-Jan Mulder, Cornelis L. Deen, Mathijs L. van Weeghel, Jaap BMC Psychiatry Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) is intended to provide a structured psychosocial programme that helps to manage the disabling effects of severe mental illnesses such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorders. It is curriculum based and aims to improve different aspects of illness management and recovery through interventions such as goal-setting, psycho-education, coping and social skills training. Its overall aim is to improve illness outcomes and support subjective and objective recovery. To date there have been four RCTs on IMR; as these yielded mixed results, further research is needed. Our hypotheses aim to test the interrelatedness assumed in Mueser’s Conceptual Framework for IMR for the many aspects of illness management, illness management outcomes and recovery. METHODS/DESIGN: This randomised multi-centre, single-blinded clinical trial is intended to compare IMR with treatment as usual for 200 outpatient clients with a severe and persistent mental illness (SMI). We will investigate whether IMR leads to better illness management, fewer symptoms and fewer relapses, and also to better subjective and objective recovery. The primary outcome measure is the score on the client version of the Illness Management and Recovery Scale. Secondary outcome measures are the clinician version of the Illness Management and Recovery scale, measures of illness management, coping, symptoms, the number of relapses, and measures of recovery. Measurement will take place before randomisation, and 12 and 18 months after randomisation. DISCUSSION: Overall, our study has the following strengths: 1.) our use of an RCT design in a country where the earlier RCTs on IMR were not conducted; 2.) the fact that participants will consist not only of people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, but also of those with various types of SMI; 3.) our inclusion of 200 participants; and 4.) the fact that we will explore the working mechanisms described in Mueser’s Conceptual Framework for IMR. Finally, 5.) because the RCT will be conducted in everyday clinical practice, we believe that the generalisability of our results will be good. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands National Trial Register (identifier: NTR 5033). Date registered: 13 January 2015. BioMed Central 2016-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4799598/ /pubmed/26995361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0774-0 Text en © Roosenschoon et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Roosenschoon, Bert-Jan Mulder, Cornelis L. Deen, Mathijs L. van Weeghel, Jaap Effectiveness of illness management and recovery (IMR) in the Netherlands: a randomised clinical trial |
title | Effectiveness of illness management and recovery (IMR) in the Netherlands: a randomised clinical trial |
title_full | Effectiveness of illness management and recovery (IMR) in the Netherlands: a randomised clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of illness management and recovery (IMR) in the Netherlands: a randomised clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of illness management and recovery (IMR) in the Netherlands: a randomised clinical trial |
title_short | Effectiveness of illness management and recovery (IMR) in the Netherlands: a randomised clinical trial |
title_sort | effectiveness of illness management and recovery (imr) in the netherlands: a randomised clinical trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4799598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26995361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0774-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roosenschoonbertjan effectivenessofillnessmanagementandrecoveryimrinthenetherlandsarandomisedclinicaltrial AT muldercornelisl effectivenessofillnessmanagementandrecoveryimrinthenetherlandsarandomisedclinicaltrial AT deenmathijsl effectivenessofillnessmanagementandrecoveryimrinthenetherlandsarandomisedclinicaltrial AT vanweegheljaap effectivenessofillnessmanagementandrecoveryimrinthenetherlandsarandomisedclinicaltrial |