Cargando…
Trial protocol to compare the efficacy of a smartphone-based blood glucose management system with standard clinic care in the gestational diabetic population
INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is rising in the UK. Good glycaemic control improves maternal and neonatal outcomes. Frequent clinical review of patients with GDM by healthcare professionals is required owing to the rapidly changing physiology of pregnancy and its...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4800121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26988348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009702 |
_version_ | 1782422436492345344 |
---|---|
author | Mackillop, Lucy H Bartlett, Katy Birks, Jacqueline Farmer, Andrew J Gibson, Oliver J Kevat, Dev A Kenworthy, Yvonne Levy, Jonathan C Loerup, Lise Tarassenko, Lionel Velardo, Carmelo Hirst, Jane E |
author_facet | Mackillop, Lucy H Bartlett, Katy Birks, Jacqueline Farmer, Andrew J Gibson, Oliver J Kevat, Dev A Kenworthy, Yvonne Levy, Jonathan C Loerup, Lise Tarassenko, Lionel Velardo, Carmelo Hirst, Jane E |
author_sort | Mackillop, Lucy H |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is rising in the UK. Good glycaemic control improves maternal and neonatal outcomes. Frequent clinical review of patients with GDM by healthcare professionals is required owing to the rapidly changing physiology of pregnancy and its unpredictable course. Novel technologies that allow home blood glucose (BG) monitoring with results transmitted in real time to a healthcare professional have the potential to deliver good-quality healthcare to women more conveniently and at a lower cost to the patient and the healthcare provider compared to the conventional face-to-face or telephone-based consultation. We have developed an integrated GDm-health management system and aim to test the impact of using this system on maternal glycaemic control, costs, patient satisfaction and maternal and neonatal outcomes compared to standard clinic care in a single large publicly funded (National Health Service (NHS)) maternity unit. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Women with confirmed gestational diabetes in a current pregnancy are individually randomised to either the GDm-health system and half the normal clinic visits or normal clinic care. Primary outcome is mean BG in each group from recruitment to delivery calculated, with adjustments made for number of BG measurements, proportion of preprandial and postprandial readings and length of time in study, and compared between the groups. The secondary objective will be to compare the two groups for compliance to the allocated BG monitoring regime, maternal and neonatal outcomes, glycaemic control using glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and other BG metrics, and patient attitudes to care assessed using a questionnaire and resource use. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Thresholds for treatment, dietary advice and clinical management are the same in both groups. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated electronically and in print. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01916694; Pre-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4800121 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48001212016-03-29 Trial protocol to compare the efficacy of a smartphone-based blood glucose management system with standard clinic care in the gestational diabetic population Mackillop, Lucy H Bartlett, Katy Birks, Jacqueline Farmer, Andrew J Gibson, Oliver J Kevat, Dev A Kenworthy, Yvonne Levy, Jonathan C Loerup, Lise Tarassenko, Lionel Velardo, Carmelo Hirst, Jane E BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is rising in the UK. Good glycaemic control improves maternal and neonatal outcomes. Frequent clinical review of patients with GDM by healthcare professionals is required owing to the rapidly changing physiology of pregnancy and its unpredictable course. Novel technologies that allow home blood glucose (BG) monitoring with results transmitted in real time to a healthcare professional have the potential to deliver good-quality healthcare to women more conveniently and at a lower cost to the patient and the healthcare provider compared to the conventional face-to-face or telephone-based consultation. We have developed an integrated GDm-health management system and aim to test the impact of using this system on maternal glycaemic control, costs, patient satisfaction and maternal and neonatal outcomes compared to standard clinic care in a single large publicly funded (National Health Service (NHS)) maternity unit. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Women with confirmed gestational diabetes in a current pregnancy are individually randomised to either the GDm-health system and half the normal clinic visits or normal clinic care. Primary outcome is mean BG in each group from recruitment to delivery calculated, with adjustments made for number of BG measurements, proportion of preprandial and postprandial readings and length of time in study, and compared between the groups. The secondary objective will be to compare the two groups for compliance to the allocated BG monitoring regime, maternal and neonatal outcomes, glycaemic control using glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and other BG metrics, and patient attitudes to care assessed using a questionnaire and resource use. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Thresholds for treatment, dietary advice and clinical management are the same in both groups. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated electronically and in print. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01916694; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4800121/ /pubmed/26988348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009702 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Obstetrics and Gynaecology Mackillop, Lucy H Bartlett, Katy Birks, Jacqueline Farmer, Andrew J Gibson, Oliver J Kevat, Dev A Kenworthy, Yvonne Levy, Jonathan C Loerup, Lise Tarassenko, Lionel Velardo, Carmelo Hirst, Jane E Trial protocol to compare the efficacy of a smartphone-based blood glucose management system with standard clinic care in the gestational diabetic population |
title | Trial protocol to compare the efficacy of a smartphone-based blood glucose management system with standard clinic care in the gestational diabetic population |
title_full | Trial protocol to compare the efficacy of a smartphone-based blood glucose management system with standard clinic care in the gestational diabetic population |
title_fullStr | Trial protocol to compare the efficacy of a smartphone-based blood glucose management system with standard clinic care in the gestational diabetic population |
title_full_unstemmed | Trial protocol to compare the efficacy of a smartphone-based blood glucose management system with standard clinic care in the gestational diabetic population |
title_short | Trial protocol to compare the efficacy of a smartphone-based blood glucose management system with standard clinic care in the gestational diabetic population |
title_sort | trial protocol to compare the efficacy of a smartphone-based blood glucose management system with standard clinic care in the gestational diabetic population |
topic | Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4800121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26988348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009702 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mackilloplucyh trialprotocoltocomparetheefficacyofasmartphonebasedbloodglucosemanagementsystemwithstandardcliniccareinthegestationaldiabeticpopulation AT bartlettkaty trialprotocoltocomparetheefficacyofasmartphonebasedbloodglucosemanagementsystemwithstandardcliniccareinthegestationaldiabeticpopulation AT birksjacqueline trialprotocoltocomparetheefficacyofasmartphonebasedbloodglucosemanagementsystemwithstandardcliniccareinthegestationaldiabeticpopulation AT farmerandrewj trialprotocoltocomparetheefficacyofasmartphonebasedbloodglucosemanagementsystemwithstandardcliniccareinthegestationaldiabeticpopulation AT gibsonoliverj trialprotocoltocomparetheefficacyofasmartphonebasedbloodglucosemanagementsystemwithstandardcliniccareinthegestationaldiabeticpopulation AT kevatdeva trialprotocoltocomparetheefficacyofasmartphonebasedbloodglucosemanagementsystemwithstandardcliniccareinthegestationaldiabeticpopulation AT kenworthyyvonne trialprotocoltocomparetheefficacyofasmartphonebasedbloodglucosemanagementsystemwithstandardcliniccareinthegestationaldiabeticpopulation AT levyjonathanc trialprotocoltocomparetheefficacyofasmartphonebasedbloodglucosemanagementsystemwithstandardcliniccareinthegestationaldiabeticpopulation AT loeruplise trialprotocoltocomparetheefficacyofasmartphonebasedbloodglucosemanagementsystemwithstandardcliniccareinthegestationaldiabeticpopulation AT tarassenkolionel trialprotocoltocomparetheefficacyofasmartphonebasedbloodglucosemanagementsystemwithstandardcliniccareinthegestationaldiabeticpopulation AT velardocarmelo trialprotocoltocomparetheefficacyofasmartphonebasedbloodglucosemanagementsystemwithstandardcliniccareinthegestationaldiabeticpopulation AT hirstjanee trialprotocoltocomparetheefficacyofasmartphonebasedbloodglucosemanagementsystemwithstandardcliniccareinthegestationaldiabeticpopulation |