Cargando…

Validation of a metered dose inhaler electronic monitoring device: implications for asthma clinical trial use

BACKGROUND: The SmartTouch Ventolin monitor (Adherium, Auckland, New Zealand) is an electronic monitor for use with a Ventolin metered dose inhaler, which records the date and time of inhaler actuations. This technology has the potential to allow in-depth analysis of patterns of inhaler use in clini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pilcher, Janine, Holliday, Mark, Ebmeier, Stefan, McKinstry, Steve, Messaoudi, Fatiha, Weatherall, Mark, Beasley, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4800169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27026805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000128
_version_ 1782422445459767296
author Pilcher, Janine
Holliday, Mark
Ebmeier, Stefan
McKinstry, Steve
Messaoudi, Fatiha
Weatherall, Mark
Beasley, Richard
author_facet Pilcher, Janine
Holliday, Mark
Ebmeier, Stefan
McKinstry, Steve
Messaoudi, Fatiha
Weatherall, Mark
Beasley, Richard
author_sort Pilcher, Janine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The SmartTouch Ventolin monitor (Adherium, Auckland, New Zealand) is an electronic monitor for use with a Ventolin metered dose inhaler, which records the date and time of inhaler actuations. This technology has the potential to allow in-depth analysis of patterns of inhaler use in clinical trial settings. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of the SmartTouch Ventolin monitor in recording Ventolin actuations. METHODS: 20 SmartTouch Ventolin monitors were attached to Ventolin metered dose inhalers. Bench testing was performed over a 10-week period, to reflect the potential time frame between visits in a clinical trial. Inhaler actuations were recorded in a paper diary, which was compared with data uploaded from the monitors. RESULTS: 2560 actuations were performed during the 10-week study period. Monitor sensitivity for diary-recorded actuations was 99.9% with a lower 97.5% confidence bound of 99.7%. The positive predictive value for diary-recorded actuations was 100% with a 97.5% lower confidence bound of 99.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The SmartTouch Ventolin monitor is highly accurate in recording and retaining electronic data. It can be recommended for use in clinical trial settings in which training and quality control systems are incorporated into study protocols to ensure accurate data acquisition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4800169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48001692016-03-29 Validation of a metered dose inhaler electronic monitoring device: implications for asthma clinical trial use Pilcher, Janine Holliday, Mark Ebmeier, Stefan McKinstry, Steve Messaoudi, Fatiha Weatherall, Mark Beasley, Richard BMJ Open Respir Res Respiratory Research BACKGROUND: The SmartTouch Ventolin monitor (Adherium, Auckland, New Zealand) is an electronic monitor for use with a Ventolin metered dose inhaler, which records the date and time of inhaler actuations. This technology has the potential to allow in-depth analysis of patterns of inhaler use in clinical trial settings. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of the SmartTouch Ventolin monitor in recording Ventolin actuations. METHODS: 20 SmartTouch Ventolin monitors were attached to Ventolin metered dose inhalers. Bench testing was performed over a 10-week period, to reflect the potential time frame between visits in a clinical trial. Inhaler actuations were recorded in a paper diary, which was compared with data uploaded from the monitors. RESULTS: 2560 actuations were performed during the 10-week study period. Monitor sensitivity for diary-recorded actuations was 99.9% with a lower 97.5% confidence bound of 99.7%. The positive predictive value for diary-recorded actuations was 100% with a 97.5% lower confidence bound of 99.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The SmartTouch Ventolin monitor is highly accurate in recording and retaining electronic data. It can be recommended for use in clinical trial settings in which training and quality control systems are incorporated into study protocols to ensure accurate data acquisition. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4800169/ /pubmed/27026805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000128 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Respiratory Research
Pilcher, Janine
Holliday, Mark
Ebmeier, Stefan
McKinstry, Steve
Messaoudi, Fatiha
Weatherall, Mark
Beasley, Richard
Validation of a metered dose inhaler electronic monitoring device: implications for asthma clinical trial use
title Validation of a metered dose inhaler electronic monitoring device: implications for asthma clinical trial use
title_full Validation of a metered dose inhaler electronic monitoring device: implications for asthma clinical trial use
title_fullStr Validation of a metered dose inhaler electronic monitoring device: implications for asthma clinical trial use
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a metered dose inhaler electronic monitoring device: implications for asthma clinical trial use
title_short Validation of a metered dose inhaler electronic monitoring device: implications for asthma clinical trial use
title_sort validation of a metered dose inhaler electronic monitoring device: implications for asthma clinical trial use
topic Respiratory Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4800169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27026805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000128
work_keys_str_mv AT pilcherjanine validationofametereddoseinhalerelectronicmonitoringdeviceimplicationsforasthmaclinicaltrialuse
AT hollidaymark validationofametereddoseinhalerelectronicmonitoringdeviceimplicationsforasthmaclinicaltrialuse
AT ebmeierstefan validationofametereddoseinhalerelectronicmonitoringdeviceimplicationsforasthmaclinicaltrialuse
AT mckinstrysteve validationofametereddoseinhalerelectronicmonitoringdeviceimplicationsforasthmaclinicaltrialuse
AT messaoudifatiha validationofametereddoseinhalerelectronicmonitoringdeviceimplicationsforasthmaclinicaltrialuse
AT weatherallmark validationofametereddoseinhalerelectronicmonitoringdeviceimplicationsforasthmaclinicaltrialuse
AT beasleyrichard validationofametereddoseinhalerelectronicmonitoringdeviceimplicationsforasthmaclinicaltrialuse