Cargando…
Validation of a metered dose inhaler electronic monitoring device: implications for asthma clinical trial use
BACKGROUND: The SmartTouch Ventolin monitor (Adherium, Auckland, New Zealand) is an electronic monitor for use with a Ventolin metered dose inhaler, which records the date and time of inhaler actuations. This technology has the potential to allow in-depth analysis of patterns of inhaler use in clini...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4800169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27026805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000128 |
_version_ | 1782422445459767296 |
---|---|
author | Pilcher, Janine Holliday, Mark Ebmeier, Stefan McKinstry, Steve Messaoudi, Fatiha Weatherall, Mark Beasley, Richard |
author_facet | Pilcher, Janine Holliday, Mark Ebmeier, Stefan McKinstry, Steve Messaoudi, Fatiha Weatherall, Mark Beasley, Richard |
author_sort | Pilcher, Janine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The SmartTouch Ventolin monitor (Adherium, Auckland, New Zealand) is an electronic monitor for use with a Ventolin metered dose inhaler, which records the date and time of inhaler actuations. This technology has the potential to allow in-depth analysis of patterns of inhaler use in clinical trial settings. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of the SmartTouch Ventolin monitor in recording Ventolin actuations. METHODS: 20 SmartTouch Ventolin monitors were attached to Ventolin metered dose inhalers. Bench testing was performed over a 10-week period, to reflect the potential time frame between visits in a clinical trial. Inhaler actuations were recorded in a paper diary, which was compared with data uploaded from the monitors. RESULTS: 2560 actuations were performed during the 10-week study period. Monitor sensitivity for diary-recorded actuations was 99.9% with a lower 97.5% confidence bound of 99.7%. The positive predictive value for diary-recorded actuations was 100% with a 97.5% lower confidence bound of 99.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The SmartTouch Ventolin monitor is highly accurate in recording and retaining electronic data. It can be recommended for use in clinical trial settings in which training and quality control systems are incorporated into study protocols to ensure accurate data acquisition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4800169 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48001692016-03-29 Validation of a metered dose inhaler electronic monitoring device: implications for asthma clinical trial use Pilcher, Janine Holliday, Mark Ebmeier, Stefan McKinstry, Steve Messaoudi, Fatiha Weatherall, Mark Beasley, Richard BMJ Open Respir Res Respiratory Research BACKGROUND: The SmartTouch Ventolin monitor (Adherium, Auckland, New Zealand) is an electronic monitor for use with a Ventolin metered dose inhaler, which records the date and time of inhaler actuations. This technology has the potential to allow in-depth analysis of patterns of inhaler use in clinical trial settings. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of the SmartTouch Ventolin monitor in recording Ventolin actuations. METHODS: 20 SmartTouch Ventolin monitors were attached to Ventolin metered dose inhalers. Bench testing was performed over a 10-week period, to reflect the potential time frame between visits in a clinical trial. Inhaler actuations were recorded in a paper diary, which was compared with data uploaded from the monitors. RESULTS: 2560 actuations were performed during the 10-week study period. Monitor sensitivity for diary-recorded actuations was 99.9% with a lower 97.5% confidence bound of 99.7%. The positive predictive value for diary-recorded actuations was 100% with a 97.5% lower confidence bound of 99.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The SmartTouch Ventolin monitor is highly accurate in recording and retaining electronic data. It can be recommended for use in clinical trial settings in which training and quality control systems are incorporated into study protocols to ensure accurate data acquisition. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4800169/ /pubmed/27026805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000128 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Respiratory Research Pilcher, Janine Holliday, Mark Ebmeier, Stefan McKinstry, Steve Messaoudi, Fatiha Weatherall, Mark Beasley, Richard Validation of a metered dose inhaler electronic monitoring device: implications for asthma clinical trial use |
title | Validation of a metered dose inhaler electronic monitoring device: implications for asthma clinical trial use |
title_full | Validation of a metered dose inhaler electronic monitoring device: implications for asthma clinical trial use |
title_fullStr | Validation of a metered dose inhaler electronic monitoring device: implications for asthma clinical trial use |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a metered dose inhaler electronic monitoring device: implications for asthma clinical trial use |
title_short | Validation of a metered dose inhaler electronic monitoring device: implications for asthma clinical trial use |
title_sort | validation of a metered dose inhaler electronic monitoring device: implications for asthma clinical trial use |
topic | Respiratory Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4800169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27026805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000128 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pilcherjanine validationofametereddoseinhalerelectronicmonitoringdeviceimplicationsforasthmaclinicaltrialuse AT hollidaymark validationofametereddoseinhalerelectronicmonitoringdeviceimplicationsforasthmaclinicaltrialuse AT ebmeierstefan validationofametereddoseinhalerelectronicmonitoringdeviceimplicationsforasthmaclinicaltrialuse AT mckinstrysteve validationofametereddoseinhalerelectronicmonitoringdeviceimplicationsforasthmaclinicaltrialuse AT messaoudifatiha validationofametereddoseinhalerelectronicmonitoringdeviceimplicationsforasthmaclinicaltrialuse AT weatherallmark validationofametereddoseinhalerelectronicmonitoringdeviceimplicationsforasthmaclinicaltrialuse AT beasleyrichard validationofametereddoseinhalerelectronicmonitoringdeviceimplicationsforasthmaclinicaltrialuse |