Cargando…
The Mad Genius Stereotype: Still Alive and Well
Scientists and laypeople agree on high ability as a defining feature of giftedness. Yet their views on gifted people's socioemotional characteristics diverge. Most studies find the gifted to be similar or slightly superior to average-ability persons in these domains (“harmony hypothesis”). Howe...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4800426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27047409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00368 |
_version_ | 1782422484086161408 |
---|---|
author | Baudson, Tanja G. |
author_facet | Baudson, Tanja G. |
author_sort | Baudson, Tanja G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Scientists and laypeople agree on high ability as a defining feature of giftedness. Yet their views on gifted people's socioemotional characteristics diverge. Most studies find the gifted to be similar or slightly superior to average-ability persons in these domains (“harmony hypothesis”). However, subjective conceptions and media representations, most of which have focused on gifted children and youth, stress the socioemotional downsides of giftedness (“disharmony hypothesis”), affecting highly able individuals and those around them, thus hampering individual development. To date, most studies on gifted stereotypes have examined selective samples, mostly teachers. The present study is the first to provide representative data on conceptions of gifted individuals in general. A brief survey of 1029 German adults assessed quality and prevalence of stereotypes about gifted individuals, without an explicit focus on children and/or adolescents. Latent class analysis (LCA) revealed two conceptions of giftedness, with twice as many “disharmonious” than “harmonious” raters. Male gender, single parenthood, unemployment, higher income or negative attitudes toward the gifted predicted disharmonious ratings. However, effects were small, suggesting future studies look deeper into the processes of stereotype formation and maintenance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4800426 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48004262016-04-04 The Mad Genius Stereotype: Still Alive and Well Baudson, Tanja G. Front Psychol Psychology Scientists and laypeople agree on high ability as a defining feature of giftedness. Yet their views on gifted people's socioemotional characteristics diverge. Most studies find the gifted to be similar or slightly superior to average-ability persons in these domains (“harmony hypothesis”). However, subjective conceptions and media representations, most of which have focused on gifted children and youth, stress the socioemotional downsides of giftedness (“disharmony hypothesis”), affecting highly able individuals and those around them, thus hampering individual development. To date, most studies on gifted stereotypes have examined selective samples, mostly teachers. The present study is the first to provide representative data on conceptions of gifted individuals in general. A brief survey of 1029 German adults assessed quality and prevalence of stereotypes about gifted individuals, without an explicit focus on children and/or adolescents. Latent class analysis (LCA) revealed two conceptions of giftedness, with twice as many “disharmonious” than “harmonious” raters. Male gender, single parenthood, unemployment, higher income or negative attitudes toward the gifted predicted disharmonious ratings. However, effects were small, suggesting future studies look deeper into the processes of stereotype formation and maintenance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4800426/ /pubmed/27047409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00368 Text en Copyright © 2016 Baudson. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Baudson, Tanja G. The Mad Genius Stereotype: Still Alive and Well |
title | The Mad Genius Stereotype: Still Alive and Well |
title_full | The Mad Genius Stereotype: Still Alive and Well |
title_fullStr | The Mad Genius Stereotype: Still Alive and Well |
title_full_unstemmed | The Mad Genius Stereotype: Still Alive and Well |
title_short | The Mad Genius Stereotype: Still Alive and Well |
title_sort | mad genius stereotype: still alive and well |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4800426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27047409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00368 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baudsontanjag themadgeniusstereotypestillaliveandwell AT baudsontanjag madgeniusstereotypestillaliveandwell |