Cargando…

Is Laparoscopic Hepatectomy a Safe, Feasible Procedure in Patients with a Previous Upper Abdominal Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic liver resection has become an accepted treatment for liver tumors or intrahepatic bile duct stones, but its application in patients with previous upper abdominal surgery is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic hepate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cai, Liu-Xin, Tong, Yi-Fan, Yu, Hong, Liang, Xiao, Liang, Yue-Long, Cai, Xiu-Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4800839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26879012
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.176068
_version_ 1782422508856672256
author Cai, Liu-Xin
Tong, Yi-Fan
Yu, Hong
Liang, Xiao
Liang, Yue-Long
Cai, Xiu-Jun
author_facet Cai, Liu-Xin
Tong, Yi-Fan
Yu, Hong
Liang, Xiao
Liang, Yue-Long
Cai, Xiu-Jun
author_sort Cai, Liu-Xin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic liver resection has become an accepted treatment for liver tumors or intrahepatic bile duct stones, but its application in patients with previous upper abdominal surgery is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic hepatectomy in these patients. METHODS: Three hundred and thirty-six patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy at our hospital from March 2012 to June 2015 were enrolled in the retrospective study. They were divided into two groups: Those with previous upper abdominal surgery (PS group, n = 42) and a control group with no previous upper abdominal surgery (NS group, n = 294). Short-term outcomes including operating time, blood loss, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality were compared among the groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in median operative duration between the PS group and the NS group (180 min vs. 160 min, P = 0.869). Median intraoperative blood loss was same between the PS group and the control group (200 ml vs. 200 ml, P = 0.907). The overall complication rate was significantly lower in the NS group than in the PS group (17.0% vs. 31.0%, P = 0.030). Mortality and other short-term outcomes did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed no significant difference between the PS group and NS group in term of short-term outcomes. Laparoscopic hepatectomy is a feasible and safe procedure for patients with previous upper abdominal surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4800839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48008392016-04-04 Is Laparoscopic Hepatectomy a Safe, Feasible Procedure in Patients with a Previous Upper Abdominal Surgery? Cai, Liu-Xin Tong, Yi-Fan Yu, Hong Liang, Xiao Liang, Yue-Long Cai, Xiu-Jun Chin Med J (Engl) Original Article BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic liver resection has become an accepted treatment for liver tumors or intrahepatic bile duct stones, but its application in patients with previous upper abdominal surgery is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic hepatectomy in these patients. METHODS: Three hundred and thirty-six patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy at our hospital from March 2012 to June 2015 were enrolled in the retrospective study. They were divided into two groups: Those with previous upper abdominal surgery (PS group, n = 42) and a control group with no previous upper abdominal surgery (NS group, n = 294). Short-term outcomes including operating time, blood loss, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality were compared among the groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in median operative duration between the PS group and the NS group (180 min vs. 160 min, P = 0.869). Median intraoperative blood loss was same between the PS group and the control group (200 ml vs. 200 ml, P = 0.907). The overall complication rate was significantly lower in the NS group than in the PS group (17.0% vs. 31.0%, P = 0.030). Mortality and other short-term outcomes did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed no significant difference between the PS group and NS group in term of short-term outcomes. Laparoscopic hepatectomy is a feasible and safe procedure for patients with previous upper abdominal surgery. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4800839/ /pubmed/26879012 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.176068 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Chinese Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cai, Liu-Xin
Tong, Yi-Fan
Yu, Hong
Liang, Xiao
Liang, Yue-Long
Cai, Xiu-Jun
Is Laparoscopic Hepatectomy a Safe, Feasible Procedure in Patients with a Previous Upper Abdominal Surgery?
title Is Laparoscopic Hepatectomy a Safe, Feasible Procedure in Patients with a Previous Upper Abdominal Surgery?
title_full Is Laparoscopic Hepatectomy a Safe, Feasible Procedure in Patients with a Previous Upper Abdominal Surgery?
title_fullStr Is Laparoscopic Hepatectomy a Safe, Feasible Procedure in Patients with a Previous Upper Abdominal Surgery?
title_full_unstemmed Is Laparoscopic Hepatectomy a Safe, Feasible Procedure in Patients with a Previous Upper Abdominal Surgery?
title_short Is Laparoscopic Hepatectomy a Safe, Feasible Procedure in Patients with a Previous Upper Abdominal Surgery?
title_sort is laparoscopic hepatectomy a safe, feasible procedure in patients with a previous upper abdominal surgery?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4800839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26879012
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.176068
work_keys_str_mv AT cailiuxin islaparoscopichepatectomyasafefeasibleprocedureinpatientswithapreviousupperabdominalsurgery
AT tongyifan islaparoscopichepatectomyasafefeasibleprocedureinpatientswithapreviousupperabdominalsurgery
AT yuhong islaparoscopichepatectomyasafefeasibleprocedureinpatientswithapreviousupperabdominalsurgery
AT liangxiao islaparoscopichepatectomyasafefeasibleprocedureinpatientswithapreviousupperabdominalsurgery
AT liangyuelong islaparoscopichepatectomyasafefeasibleprocedureinpatientswithapreviousupperabdominalsurgery
AT caixiujun islaparoscopichepatectomyasafefeasibleprocedureinpatientswithapreviousupperabdominalsurgery