Cargando…
Comparison of outcome of tibial plafond fractures managed by hybrid external fixation versus two-stage management with final plate fixation
BACKGROUND: Tibial platfond fractures are usually associated with massive swelling of the foot and ankle, as well as with open wounds. This swelling may cause significant decrease of the blood flow, so the state of the soft tissue is determinant for the surgical indication and the type of implant. T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4800953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27053800 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.177577 |
_version_ | 1782422530148007936 |
---|---|
author | Cisneros, Luis Natera Gómez, Mireia Alvarez, Carlos Millán, Angélica De Caso, Julio Soria, Laura |
author_facet | Cisneros, Luis Natera Gómez, Mireia Alvarez, Carlos Millán, Angélica De Caso, Julio Soria, Laura |
author_sort | Cisneros, Luis Natera |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Tibial platfond fractures are usually associated with massive swelling of the foot and ankle, as well as with open wounds. This swelling may cause significant decrease of the blood flow, so the state of the soft tissue is determinant for the surgical indication and the type of implant. This retrospective study compares the union times in cases of tibial plafond fractures managed with a hybrid external fixation as a definitive procedure versus those managed with a two stage strategy with final plate fixation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study in a polytrauma referral hospital was performed between 2005 and 2011. Patients with a tibial plafond fracture, managed with a hybrid external fixation as a definitive procedure or managed with a two stage strategy with the final plate fixation were included in the study. Postoperative radiographs were evaluated by two senior surgeons. Fracture healing was defined as callus bridging of one cortex, seen on both lateral and anteroposterior X-ray. The clinical outcome was evaluated by means of 11 points Numerical Rating Scale for pain and The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle score, assessed at the last followup visit. Thirteen patients had been managed with a hybrid external fixation and 18 with a two-stage strategy with the final plate fixation. There were 14 males and 17 females with a mean age of 48 years (range 19–82 years). The mean followup was 24 months (range 24–70 months). RESULTS: The mean time from surgery to weight bearing was 7 ± 6.36 days for the hybrid fixation group and 57.43 ± 15.46 days for the plate fixation group (P < 0.0001); and the mean time from fracture to radiological union was 133.82 ± 37.83) and 152.8 ± 72.33 days respectively (P = 0.560). CONCLUSION: Besides the differences between groups regarding the baseline characteristics of patients, the results of this study suggest that in cases of tibial plafond fractures, the management with a hybrid external fixation as a definitive procedure might involve a faster union than a two-stage management with final plate fixation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4800953 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48009532016-04-06 Comparison of outcome of tibial plafond fractures managed by hybrid external fixation versus two-stage management with final plate fixation Cisneros, Luis Natera Gómez, Mireia Alvarez, Carlos Millán, Angélica De Caso, Julio Soria, Laura Indian J Orthop Knee Symposium BACKGROUND: Tibial platfond fractures are usually associated with massive swelling of the foot and ankle, as well as with open wounds. This swelling may cause significant decrease of the blood flow, so the state of the soft tissue is determinant for the surgical indication and the type of implant. This retrospective study compares the union times in cases of tibial plafond fractures managed with a hybrid external fixation as a definitive procedure versus those managed with a two stage strategy with final plate fixation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study in a polytrauma referral hospital was performed between 2005 and 2011. Patients with a tibial plafond fracture, managed with a hybrid external fixation as a definitive procedure or managed with a two stage strategy with the final plate fixation were included in the study. Postoperative radiographs were evaluated by two senior surgeons. Fracture healing was defined as callus bridging of one cortex, seen on both lateral and anteroposterior X-ray. The clinical outcome was evaluated by means of 11 points Numerical Rating Scale for pain and The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle score, assessed at the last followup visit. Thirteen patients had been managed with a hybrid external fixation and 18 with a two-stage strategy with the final plate fixation. There were 14 males and 17 females with a mean age of 48 years (range 19–82 years). The mean followup was 24 months (range 24–70 months). RESULTS: The mean time from surgery to weight bearing was 7 ± 6.36 days for the hybrid fixation group and 57.43 ± 15.46 days for the plate fixation group (P < 0.0001); and the mean time from fracture to radiological union was 133.82 ± 37.83) and 152.8 ± 72.33 days respectively (P = 0.560). CONCLUSION: Besides the differences between groups regarding the baseline characteristics of patients, the results of this study suggest that in cases of tibial plafond fractures, the management with a hybrid external fixation as a definitive procedure might involve a faster union than a two-stage management with final plate fixation. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4800953/ /pubmed/27053800 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.177577 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Knee Symposium Cisneros, Luis Natera Gómez, Mireia Alvarez, Carlos Millán, Angélica De Caso, Julio Soria, Laura Comparison of outcome of tibial plafond fractures managed by hybrid external fixation versus two-stage management with final plate fixation |
title | Comparison of outcome of tibial plafond fractures managed by hybrid external fixation versus two-stage management with final plate fixation |
title_full | Comparison of outcome of tibial plafond fractures managed by hybrid external fixation versus two-stage management with final plate fixation |
title_fullStr | Comparison of outcome of tibial plafond fractures managed by hybrid external fixation versus two-stage management with final plate fixation |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of outcome of tibial plafond fractures managed by hybrid external fixation versus two-stage management with final plate fixation |
title_short | Comparison of outcome of tibial plafond fractures managed by hybrid external fixation versus two-stage management with final plate fixation |
title_sort | comparison of outcome of tibial plafond fractures managed by hybrid external fixation versus two-stage management with final plate fixation |
topic | Knee Symposium |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4800953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27053800 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.177577 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cisnerosluisnatera comparisonofoutcomeoftibialplafondfracturesmanagedbyhybridexternalfixationversustwostagemanagementwithfinalplatefixation AT gomezmireia comparisonofoutcomeoftibialplafondfracturesmanagedbyhybridexternalfixationversustwostagemanagementwithfinalplatefixation AT alvarezcarlos comparisonofoutcomeoftibialplafondfracturesmanagedbyhybridexternalfixationversustwostagemanagementwithfinalplatefixation AT millanangelica comparisonofoutcomeoftibialplafondfracturesmanagedbyhybridexternalfixationversustwostagemanagementwithfinalplatefixation AT decasojulio comparisonofoutcomeoftibialplafondfracturesmanagedbyhybridexternalfixationversustwostagemanagementwithfinalplatefixation AT sorialaura comparisonofoutcomeoftibialplafondfracturesmanagedbyhybridexternalfixationversustwostagemanagementwithfinalplatefixation |