Cargando…

Midterm survivorship and clinical outcome of INDUS knee prosthesis: 5 year followup study

BACKGROUND: INDUS knee implant has been designed as per the anatomical morphology of the Indian population and has shown good clinical outcome in short term studies. The purpose of the present study was to report the midterm survivorship and clinical outcome of this implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sancheti, Kantilal H, Sancheti, Parag K, Joshi, Rajeev S, Patil, Kailash R, Shyam, Ashok K, Bhaskar, Raja R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4800954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27053801
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.177583
_version_ 1782422530369257472
author Sancheti, Kantilal H
Sancheti, Parag K
Joshi, Rajeev S
Patil, Kailash R
Shyam, Ashok K
Bhaskar, Raja R
author_facet Sancheti, Kantilal H
Sancheti, Parag K
Joshi, Rajeev S
Patil, Kailash R
Shyam, Ashok K
Bhaskar, Raja R
author_sort Sancheti, Kantilal H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: INDUS knee implant has been designed as per the anatomical morphology of the Indian population and has shown good clinical outcome in short term studies. The purpose of the present study was to report the midterm survivorship and clinical outcome of this implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and twenty three primary total knee arthroplasties in 209 consecutive patients using the INDUS knee prosthesis were prospectively enrolled. There were 145 females (155 knees) and 64 males (68 knees) with a mean age of 69.95 years (range 42–86 years). Annual followup with clinical and radiological examination was conducted, and a survivorship analysis was done using the Kaplan–Meier analysis. RESULTS: Mean followup was 5.8 years (range 5–6.5 years). Eleven patients died while eight were lost to followup and a total of 204 knees were available for followup. The mean knee flexion improved from preoperative 110.4° ± 11.24° (range 60°–130°) to 128.17° ± 8.32° (range 100°–140°) at the final followup. The mean knee score improved from 40.1 ± 10.7 to 90.3 ± 5.34 while the function score improved from 44.35 ± 12.9 to 89.58 ± 7.43. Two patient developed infection and required revision. The Kaplan–Meier analysis reported a survivorship of 98.6% (confidence interval 95.7–99.6%) at the end for 5 years for INDUS knee prosthesis. CONCLUSION: INDUS knee prosthesis has excellent survivorship with a good clinical outcome and low failure rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4800954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48009542016-04-06 Midterm survivorship and clinical outcome of INDUS knee prosthesis: 5 year followup study Sancheti, Kantilal H Sancheti, Parag K Joshi, Rajeev S Patil, Kailash R Shyam, Ashok K Bhaskar, Raja R Indian J Orthop Knee Symposium BACKGROUND: INDUS knee implant has been designed as per the anatomical morphology of the Indian population and has shown good clinical outcome in short term studies. The purpose of the present study was to report the midterm survivorship and clinical outcome of this implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and twenty three primary total knee arthroplasties in 209 consecutive patients using the INDUS knee prosthesis were prospectively enrolled. There were 145 females (155 knees) and 64 males (68 knees) with a mean age of 69.95 years (range 42–86 years). Annual followup with clinical and radiological examination was conducted, and a survivorship analysis was done using the Kaplan–Meier analysis. RESULTS: Mean followup was 5.8 years (range 5–6.5 years). Eleven patients died while eight were lost to followup and a total of 204 knees were available for followup. The mean knee flexion improved from preoperative 110.4° ± 11.24° (range 60°–130°) to 128.17° ± 8.32° (range 100°–140°) at the final followup. The mean knee score improved from 40.1 ± 10.7 to 90.3 ± 5.34 while the function score improved from 44.35 ± 12.9 to 89.58 ± 7.43. Two patient developed infection and required revision. The Kaplan–Meier analysis reported a survivorship of 98.6% (confidence interval 95.7–99.6%) at the end for 5 years for INDUS knee prosthesis. CONCLUSION: INDUS knee prosthesis has excellent survivorship with a good clinical outcome and low failure rate. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4800954/ /pubmed/27053801 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.177583 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Knee Symposium
Sancheti, Kantilal H
Sancheti, Parag K
Joshi, Rajeev S
Patil, Kailash R
Shyam, Ashok K
Bhaskar, Raja R
Midterm survivorship and clinical outcome of INDUS knee prosthesis: 5 year followup study
title Midterm survivorship and clinical outcome of INDUS knee prosthesis: 5 year followup study
title_full Midterm survivorship and clinical outcome of INDUS knee prosthesis: 5 year followup study
title_fullStr Midterm survivorship and clinical outcome of INDUS knee prosthesis: 5 year followup study
title_full_unstemmed Midterm survivorship and clinical outcome of INDUS knee prosthesis: 5 year followup study
title_short Midterm survivorship and clinical outcome of INDUS knee prosthesis: 5 year followup study
title_sort midterm survivorship and clinical outcome of indus knee prosthesis: 5 year followup study
topic Knee Symposium
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4800954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27053801
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.177583
work_keys_str_mv AT sanchetikantilalh midtermsurvivorshipandclinicaloutcomeofinduskneeprosthesis5yearfollowupstudy
AT sanchetiparagk midtermsurvivorshipandclinicaloutcomeofinduskneeprosthesis5yearfollowupstudy
AT joshirajeevs midtermsurvivorshipandclinicaloutcomeofinduskneeprosthesis5yearfollowupstudy
AT patilkailashr midtermsurvivorshipandclinicaloutcomeofinduskneeprosthesis5yearfollowupstudy
AT shyamashokk midtermsurvivorshipandclinicaloutcomeofinduskneeprosthesis5yearfollowupstudy
AT bhaskarrajar midtermsurvivorshipandclinicaloutcomeofinduskneeprosthesis5yearfollowupstudy