Cargando…

Ear Lobule Rejuvenation in Face-Lifting: The Role of Fat Augmentation

BACKGROUND: Ear lobule ptosis and deflation are characteristics of facial aging. A rhytidectomy without rejuvenation of a deflated ear lobule may fail to address all aspects of facial aging. Fillers have been used to treat ear lobule deflation; however, autologous fat transfer has never been utilize...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hammoudeh, Ziyad S., Small, Kevin, Unger, Jacob G., Stark, Ran, Rohrich, Rod J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4801090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27104096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000476
_version_ 1782422543349579776
author Hammoudeh, Ziyad S.
Small, Kevin
Unger, Jacob G.
Stark, Ran
Rohrich, Rod J.
author_facet Hammoudeh, Ziyad S.
Small, Kevin
Unger, Jacob G.
Stark, Ran
Rohrich, Rod J.
author_sort Hammoudeh, Ziyad S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ear lobule ptosis and deflation are characteristics of facial aging. A rhytidectomy without rejuvenation of a deflated ear lobule may fail to address all aspects of facial aging. Fillers have been used to treat ear lobule deflation; however, autologous fat transfer has never been utilized for ear lobule rejuvenation. This investigation studies the success of autologous fat transfer to the ear lobule as part of volume augmentation rhytidectomy. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent rhytidectomy between 2000 and 2014 by a single surgeon was performed. Patients between 2000 and 2004 who did not receive autologous fat transfer served as controls (group A). Patients between 2010 and 2014 who received autologous fat transfer to the ear lobule formed the treatment group (group B). Three independent observers reviewed preoperative and postoperative photographs for both groups at 1 year postoperatively. The following ear lobule volume grading scale was applied to numerically assess the patients: concave = 0, flat = 1, convex = 2, and round = 3. RESULTS: Groups A and B each consisted of 65 consecutive patients (130 ears). In group A, the mean preoperative ear lobule grading score was 1.20, and the mean postoperative score was 1.22 (mean difference, 0.02; P = 0.42). In group B, the mean preoperative ear lobule grading score was 0.98, and the mean postoperative score was 2.00 (mean difference, 1.02; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In patients receiving autologous fat transfer to the ear lobule during rhytidectomy, there was a significant change from a deflated ear lobule preoperatively to a more voluminous lobule at 1 year postoperatively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4801090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48010902016-04-21 Ear Lobule Rejuvenation in Face-Lifting: The Role of Fat Augmentation Hammoudeh, Ziyad S. Small, Kevin Unger, Jacob G. Stark, Ran Rohrich, Rod J. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Ear lobule ptosis and deflation are characteristics of facial aging. A rhytidectomy without rejuvenation of a deflated ear lobule may fail to address all aspects of facial aging. Fillers have been used to treat ear lobule deflation; however, autologous fat transfer has never been utilized for ear lobule rejuvenation. This investigation studies the success of autologous fat transfer to the ear lobule as part of volume augmentation rhytidectomy. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent rhytidectomy between 2000 and 2014 by a single surgeon was performed. Patients between 2000 and 2004 who did not receive autologous fat transfer served as controls (group A). Patients between 2010 and 2014 who received autologous fat transfer to the ear lobule formed the treatment group (group B). Three independent observers reviewed preoperative and postoperative photographs for both groups at 1 year postoperatively. The following ear lobule volume grading scale was applied to numerically assess the patients: concave = 0, flat = 1, convex = 2, and round = 3. RESULTS: Groups A and B each consisted of 65 consecutive patients (130 ears). In group A, the mean preoperative ear lobule grading score was 1.20, and the mean postoperative score was 1.22 (mean difference, 0.02; P = 0.42). In group B, the mean preoperative ear lobule grading score was 0.98, and the mean postoperative score was 2.00 (mean difference, 1.02; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In patients receiving autologous fat transfer to the ear lobule during rhytidectomy, there was a significant change from a deflated ear lobule preoperatively to a more voluminous lobule at 1 year postoperatively. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4801090/ /pubmed/27104096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000476 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hammoudeh, Ziyad S.
Small, Kevin
Unger, Jacob G.
Stark, Ran
Rohrich, Rod J.
Ear Lobule Rejuvenation in Face-Lifting: The Role of Fat Augmentation
title Ear Lobule Rejuvenation in Face-Lifting: The Role of Fat Augmentation
title_full Ear Lobule Rejuvenation in Face-Lifting: The Role of Fat Augmentation
title_fullStr Ear Lobule Rejuvenation in Face-Lifting: The Role of Fat Augmentation
title_full_unstemmed Ear Lobule Rejuvenation in Face-Lifting: The Role of Fat Augmentation
title_short Ear Lobule Rejuvenation in Face-Lifting: The Role of Fat Augmentation
title_sort ear lobule rejuvenation in face-lifting: the role of fat augmentation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4801090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27104096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000476
work_keys_str_mv AT hammoudehziyads earlobulerejuvenationinfaceliftingtheroleoffataugmentation
AT smallkevin earlobulerejuvenationinfaceliftingtheroleoffataugmentation
AT ungerjacobg earlobulerejuvenationinfaceliftingtheroleoffataugmentation
AT starkran earlobulerejuvenationinfaceliftingtheroleoffataugmentation
AT rohrichrodj earlobulerejuvenationinfaceliftingtheroleoffataugmentation