Cargando…

Comparison of single agent versus combined chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced urothelial cancer (UC) and is generally used in the first-line setting. However, the optimal salvage treatment for previously treated UC patients is unclear. We conducted a systematic review of published clinical trials o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Xiao-Jun, Zhi, Yi, He, Peng, Zhou, Xiao-Zhou, Zheng, Ji, Chen, Zhi-Wen, Zhou, Zhan-Song
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4801158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27042121
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S97062
_version_ 1782422551899668480
author Wu, Xiao-Jun
Zhi, Yi
He, Peng
Zhou, Xiao-Zhou
Zheng, Ji
Chen, Zhi-Wen
Zhou, Zhan-Song
author_facet Wu, Xiao-Jun
Zhi, Yi
He, Peng
Zhou, Xiao-Zhou
Zheng, Ji
Chen, Zhi-Wen
Zhou, Zhan-Song
author_sort Wu, Xiao-Jun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced urothelial cancer (UC) and is generally used in the first-line setting. However, the optimal salvage treatment for previously treated UC patients is unclear. We conducted a systematic review of published clinical trials of single agent versus combined chemotherapy as salvage treatment in previously treated UC patients. METHODS: Trials published between 1994 and 2015 were identified by an electronic search of public databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library). All relevant studies were independently identified by two authors for inclusion. Demographic data, treatment regimens, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS), and grade 3/4 toxicities were extracted and analyzed using Comprehensive Meta Analysis software (Version 2.0). RESULTS: Fifty cohorts with 1,685 patients were included for analysis: 814 patients were treated with single agent chemotherapy and 871 with combined chemotherapy. Pooled OS was significantly higher at 1 year for combined chemotherapy than for single agent (relative risk [RR] 1.52; 95% CI: 1.01–2.37; P=0.03) but not for 2-year OS (RR 1.31; 95% CI: 0.92–1.85; P=0.064). Additionally, combined chemotherapy significantly improved ORR (RR 2.25; 95% CI: 1.60–3.18; P<0.001) and DCR (RR 1.12; 95% CI: 1.01–1.25, P=0.033) compared to single agent for advanced UC patients. As for grade 3 and 4 toxicities, more frequencies of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in the combined chemotherapy than in single agent group, while equivalent frequencies of anemia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were found between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In comparison with single agent alone, combined chemotherapy as salvage treatment for advanced UC patients significantly improved ORR, DCR, and 1-year OS, but not 2-year OS. Our findings support the need to compare combined chemotherapy with single agent alone in the salvage setting in large prospective trials due to its potential survival benefit in advanced UC patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4801158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48011582016-04-01 Comparison of single agent versus combined chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis Wu, Xiao-Jun Zhi, Yi He, Peng Zhou, Xiao-Zhou Zheng, Ji Chen, Zhi-Wen Zhou, Zhan-Song Onco Targets Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced urothelial cancer (UC) and is generally used in the first-line setting. However, the optimal salvage treatment for previously treated UC patients is unclear. We conducted a systematic review of published clinical trials of single agent versus combined chemotherapy as salvage treatment in previously treated UC patients. METHODS: Trials published between 1994 and 2015 were identified by an electronic search of public databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library). All relevant studies were independently identified by two authors for inclusion. Demographic data, treatment regimens, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS), and grade 3/4 toxicities were extracted and analyzed using Comprehensive Meta Analysis software (Version 2.0). RESULTS: Fifty cohorts with 1,685 patients were included for analysis: 814 patients were treated with single agent chemotherapy and 871 with combined chemotherapy. Pooled OS was significantly higher at 1 year for combined chemotherapy than for single agent (relative risk [RR] 1.52; 95% CI: 1.01–2.37; P=0.03) but not for 2-year OS (RR 1.31; 95% CI: 0.92–1.85; P=0.064). Additionally, combined chemotherapy significantly improved ORR (RR 2.25; 95% CI: 1.60–3.18; P<0.001) and DCR (RR 1.12; 95% CI: 1.01–1.25, P=0.033) compared to single agent for advanced UC patients. As for grade 3 and 4 toxicities, more frequencies of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in the combined chemotherapy than in single agent group, while equivalent frequencies of anemia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were found between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In comparison with single agent alone, combined chemotherapy as salvage treatment for advanced UC patients significantly improved ORR, DCR, and 1-year OS, but not 2-year OS. Our findings support the need to compare combined chemotherapy with single agent alone in the salvage setting in large prospective trials due to its potential survival benefit in advanced UC patients. Dove Medical Press 2016-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4801158/ /pubmed/27042121 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S97062 Text en © 2016 Wu et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Wu, Xiao-Jun
Zhi, Yi
He, Peng
Zhou, Xiao-Zhou
Zheng, Ji
Chen, Zhi-Wen
Zhou, Zhan-Song
Comparison of single agent versus combined chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis
title Comparison of single agent versus combined chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of single agent versus combined chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of single agent versus combined chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of single agent versus combined chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of single agent versus combined chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of single agent versus combined chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4801158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27042121
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S97062
work_keys_str_mv AT wuxiaojun comparisonofsingleagentversuscombinedchemotherapyinpreviouslytreatedpatientswithadvancedurothelialcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT zhiyi comparisonofsingleagentversuscombinedchemotherapyinpreviouslytreatedpatientswithadvancedurothelialcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT hepeng comparisonofsingleagentversuscombinedchemotherapyinpreviouslytreatedpatientswithadvancedurothelialcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT zhouxiaozhou comparisonofsingleagentversuscombinedchemotherapyinpreviouslytreatedpatientswithadvancedurothelialcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT zhengji comparisonofsingleagentversuscombinedchemotherapyinpreviouslytreatedpatientswithadvancedurothelialcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT chenzhiwen comparisonofsingleagentversuscombinedchemotherapyinpreviouslytreatedpatientswithadvancedurothelialcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT zhouzhansong comparisonofsingleagentversuscombinedchemotherapyinpreviouslytreatedpatientswithadvancedurothelialcarcinomaametaanalysis