Cargando…

Validity of the Kinect for Gait Assessment: A Focused Review

Gait analysis may enhance clinical practice. However, its use is limited due to the need for expensive equipment which is not always available in clinical settings. Recent evidence suggests that Microsoft Kinect may provide a low cost gait analysis method. The purpose of this report is to critically...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Springer, Shmuel, Yogev Seligmann, Galit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4801571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26861323
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16020194
_version_ 1782422599478804480
author Springer, Shmuel
Yogev Seligmann, Galit
author_facet Springer, Shmuel
Yogev Seligmann, Galit
author_sort Springer, Shmuel
collection PubMed
description Gait analysis may enhance clinical practice. However, its use is limited due to the need for expensive equipment which is not always available in clinical settings. Recent evidence suggests that Microsoft Kinect may provide a low cost gait analysis method. The purpose of this report is to critically evaluate the literature describing the concurrent validity of using the Kinect as a gait analysis instrument. An online search of PubMed, CINAHL, and ProQuest databases was performed. Included were studies in which walking was assessed with the Kinect and another gold standard device, and consisted of at least one numerical finding of spatiotemporal or kinematic measures. Our search identified 366 papers, from which 12 relevant studies were retrieved. The results demonstrate that the Kinect is valid only for some spatiotemporal gait parameters. Although the kinematic parameters measured by the Kinect followed the trend of the joint trajectories, they showed poor validity and large errors. In conclusion, the Kinect may have the potential to be used as a tool for measuring spatiotemporal aspects of gait, yet standardized methods should be established, and future examinations with both healthy subjects and clinical participants are required in order to integrate the Kinect as a clinical gait analysis tool.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4801571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48015712016-03-25 Validity of the Kinect for Gait Assessment: A Focused Review Springer, Shmuel Yogev Seligmann, Galit Sensors (Basel) Review Gait analysis may enhance clinical practice. However, its use is limited due to the need for expensive equipment which is not always available in clinical settings. Recent evidence suggests that Microsoft Kinect may provide a low cost gait analysis method. The purpose of this report is to critically evaluate the literature describing the concurrent validity of using the Kinect as a gait analysis instrument. An online search of PubMed, CINAHL, and ProQuest databases was performed. Included were studies in which walking was assessed with the Kinect and another gold standard device, and consisted of at least one numerical finding of spatiotemporal or kinematic measures. Our search identified 366 papers, from which 12 relevant studies were retrieved. The results demonstrate that the Kinect is valid only for some spatiotemporal gait parameters. Although the kinematic parameters measured by the Kinect followed the trend of the joint trajectories, they showed poor validity and large errors. In conclusion, the Kinect may have the potential to be used as a tool for measuring spatiotemporal aspects of gait, yet standardized methods should be established, and future examinations with both healthy subjects and clinical participants are required in order to integrate the Kinect as a clinical gait analysis tool. MDPI 2016-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4801571/ /pubmed/26861323 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16020194 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Springer, Shmuel
Yogev Seligmann, Galit
Validity of the Kinect for Gait Assessment: A Focused Review
title Validity of the Kinect for Gait Assessment: A Focused Review
title_full Validity of the Kinect for Gait Assessment: A Focused Review
title_fullStr Validity of the Kinect for Gait Assessment: A Focused Review
title_full_unstemmed Validity of the Kinect for Gait Assessment: A Focused Review
title_short Validity of the Kinect for Gait Assessment: A Focused Review
title_sort validity of the kinect for gait assessment: a focused review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4801571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26861323
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16020194
work_keys_str_mv AT springershmuel validityofthekinectforgaitassessmentafocusedreview
AT yogevseligmanngalit validityofthekinectforgaitassessmentafocusedreview