Cargando…

Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The present study retrospectively analyzed the data of 213 patients who underwent laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 213 patients, in whom we performed conventional laparoscopic ureterolithotomy from April 2006 and January 2015 b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Şahin, Selçuk, Aras, Bekir, Ekşi, Mithat, Şener, Nevzat Can, Tugču, Volkan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4801647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27019576
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2016.00004
_version_ 1782422616678596608
author Şahin, Selçuk
Aras, Bekir
Ekşi, Mithat
Şener, Nevzat Can
Tugču, Volkan
author_facet Şahin, Selçuk
Aras, Bekir
Ekşi, Mithat
Şener, Nevzat Can
Tugču, Volkan
author_sort Şahin, Selçuk
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The present study retrospectively analyzed the data of 213 patients who underwent laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 213 patients, in whom we performed conventional laparoscopic ureterolithotomy from April 2006 and January 2015 based on the diagnosis of an upper or middle ureteral stone. Patients with large ureteral stones (>15 mm) or a history of failed shock-wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy were included in the study. Although the retroperitoneal approach was preferred for 170 patients, the transperitoneal approach was used in the remaining 43 patients. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 39.3 ± 12.0 years (range, 18–73). The study population was composed of 78 (26.7%) female and 135 (63.3%) male patients. The mean stone size was 19.7 ± 2.5 mm. The mean operative time was 80.9 ± 10.9 minutes, and the mean blood loss was 63.3 ± 12.7 mL. Intraoperative insertion of a double-J catheter was performed in 76 patients. The overall stone-free rate was 99%. No major complication was observed in any patient. However, conversion to open surgery was necessary in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: With high success and low complication rates, laparoscopic ureterolithotomy is an effective and reliable method that ensures quick recovery and may be the first treatment option for patients with large, impacted ureteral stones, as well as for those with a history of failed primary treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4801647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48016472016-03-25 Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy Şahin, Selçuk Aras, Bekir Ekşi, Mithat Şener, Nevzat Can Tugču, Volkan JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The present study retrospectively analyzed the data of 213 patients who underwent laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 213 patients, in whom we performed conventional laparoscopic ureterolithotomy from April 2006 and January 2015 based on the diagnosis of an upper or middle ureteral stone. Patients with large ureteral stones (>15 mm) or a history of failed shock-wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy were included in the study. Although the retroperitoneal approach was preferred for 170 patients, the transperitoneal approach was used in the remaining 43 patients. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 39.3 ± 12.0 years (range, 18–73). The study population was composed of 78 (26.7%) female and 135 (63.3%) male patients. The mean stone size was 19.7 ± 2.5 mm. The mean operative time was 80.9 ± 10.9 minutes, and the mean blood loss was 63.3 ± 12.7 mL. Intraoperative insertion of a double-J catheter was performed in 76 patients. The overall stone-free rate was 99%. No major complication was observed in any patient. However, conversion to open surgery was necessary in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: With high success and low complication rates, laparoscopic ureterolithotomy is an effective and reliable method that ensures quick recovery and may be the first treatment option for patients with large, impacted ureteral stones, as well as for those with a history of failed primary treatment. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4801647/ /pubmed/27019576 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2016.00004 Text en © 2016 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Şahin, Selçuk
Aras, Bekir
Ekşi, Mithat
Şener, Nevzat Can
Tugču, Volkan
Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy
title Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy
title_full Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy
title_fullStr Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy
title_short Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy
title_sort laparoscopic ureterolithotomy
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4801647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27019576
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2016.00004
work_keys_str_mv AT sahinselcuk laparoscopicureterolithotomy
AT arasbekir laparoscopicureterolithotomy
AT eksimithat laparoscopicureterolithotomy
AT senernevzatcan laparoscopicureterolithotomy
AT tugcuvolkan laparoscopicureterolithotomy