Cargando…

Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: An Initial Experience

BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S‐ICD) has been developed to avert risks associated with transvenous defibrillator leads. The technology is attractive for younger patients, such as those with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, there are limited data on S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weinstock, Jonathan, Bader, Yousef H., Maron, Martin S., Rowin, Ethan J., Link, Mark S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4802466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26873684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002488
_version_ 1782422727343210496
author Weinstock, Jonathan
Bader, Yousef H.
Maron, Martin S.
Rowin, Ethan J.
Link, Mark S.
author_facet Weinstock, Jonathan
Bader, Yousef H.
Maron, Martin S.
Rowin, Ethan J.
Link, Mark S.
author_sort Weinstock, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S‐ICD) has been developed to avert risks associated with transvenous defibrillator leads. The technology is attractive for younger patients, such as those with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, there are limited data on S‐ICD use in HCM. METHODS AND RESULTS: HCM patients identified at risk for sudden death were considered for S‐ICD implantation. Patients were screened for potential oversensing by surface electrocardiography (ECG). At implant, defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing was performed at 65, 50, and 35 joules (J). Twenty‐seven patients were considered for S‐ICD implantation, and after screening, 23 (85%) remained eligible. The presence of a bundle branch block was associated with screening failure, whereas elevated body mass index (BMI) showed a trend toward association. One patient passed screening at rest, but failed with an ECG obtained after exercise. At implant, the S‐ICD terminated ventricular fibrillation (VF) with a 65J shock in all 15 implanted patients and a 50J shock was successful in 12 of 15. A 35J shock terminated VF in 10 of 12 patients. DFT failure at 50 J was associated with a higher BMI. There were no appropriate shocks after a median follow‐up of 17.5 (3–35) months, and 1 patient received an inappropriate shock attributable to a temporary reduction in QRS amplitude while bending forward, resulting in oversensing, despite successful screening. CONCLUSIONS: In a high‐risk HCM cohort without a pacing indication referred for consideration of an ICD, the majority were eligible for S‐ICD. The S‐ICD is effective at recognizing and terminating VF at implant with a wide safety margin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4802466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48024662016-04-08 Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: An Initial Experience Weinstock, Jonathan Bader, Yousef H. Maron, Martin S. Rowin, Ethan J. Link, Mark S. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S‐ICD) has been developed to avert risks associated with transvenous defibrillator leads. The technology is attractive for younger patients, such as those with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, there are limited data on S‐ICD use in HCM. METHODS AND RESULTS: HCM patients identified at risk for sudden death were considered for S‐ICD implantation. Patients were screened for potential oversensing by surface electrocardiography (ECG). At implant, defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing was performed at 65, 50, and 35 joules (J). Twenty‐seven patients were considered for S‐ICD implantation, and after screening, 23 (85%) remained eligible. The presence of a bundle branch block was associated with screening failure, whereas elevated body mass index (BMI) showed a trend toward association. One patient passed screening at rest, but failed with an ECG obtained after exercise. At implant, the S‐ICD terminated ventricular fibrillation (VF) with a 65J shock in all 15 implanted patients and a 50J shock was successful in 12 of 15. A 35J shock terminated VF in 10 of 12 patients. DFT failure at 50 J was associated with a higher BMI. There were no appropriate shocks after a median follow‐up of 17.5 (3–35) months, and 1 patient received an inappropriate shock attributable to a temporary reduction in QRS amplitude while bending forward, resulting in oversensing, despite successful screening. CONCLUSIONS: In a high‐risk HCM cohort without a pacing indication referred for consideration of an ICD, the majority were eligible for S‐ICD. The S‐ICD is effective at recognizing and terminating VF at implant with a wide safety margin. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4802466/ /pubmed/26873684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002488 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Weinstock, Jonathan
Bader, Yousef H.
Maron, Martin S.
Rowin, Ethan J.
Link, Mark S.
Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: An Initial Experience
title Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: An Initial Experience
title_full Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: An Initial Experience
title_fullStr Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: An Initial Experience
title_full_unstemmed Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: An Initial Experience
title_short Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: An Initial Experience
title_sort subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: an initial experience
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4802466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26873684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002488
work_keys_str_mv AT weinstockjonathan subcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorinpatientswithhypertrophiccardiomyopathyaninitialexperience
AT baderyousefh subcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorinpatientswithhypertrophiccardiomyopathyaninitialexperience
AT maronmartins subcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorinpatientswithhypertrophiccardiomyopathyaninitialexperience
AT rowinethanj subcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorinpatientswithhypertrophiccardiomyopathyaninitialexperience
AT linkmarks subcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorinpatientswithhypertrophiccardiomyopathyaninitialexperience