Cargando…

A pilot proof-of-principle study to compare fresh and vitrified cycle preimplantation genetic screening by chromosome microarray and next generation sequencing

BACKGROUND: Single embryo transfer (SET) has been utilized as a strategy to reduce the chance of multifetal gestations in in vitro fertilization (IVF) but lower pregnancy rate remains a concern. Recent studies showed that favorable outcome regarding SET can be achieved by selecting embryos with “mor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Gwo-Chin, Chen, Hsin-Fu, Yang, Yu-Shih, Lin, Wen-Hsiang, Tsai, Feng-Po, Lin, Chi-Fang, Chiu, Chi, Chen, Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4802588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27006692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-016-0238-8
_version_ 1782422750513594368
author Ma, Gwo-Chin
Chen, Hsin-Fu
Yang, Yu-Shih
Lin, Wen-Hsiang
Tsai, Feng-Po
Lin, Chi-Fang
Chiu, Chi
Chen, Ming
author_facet Ma, Gwo-Chin
Chen, Hsin-Fu
Yang, Yu-Shih
Lin, Wen-Hsiang
Tsai, Feng-Po
Lin, Chi-Fang
Chiu, Chi
Chen, Ming
author_sort Ma, Gwo-Chin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Single embryo transfer (SET) has been utilized as a strategy to reduce the chance of multifetal gestations in in vitro fertilization (IVF) but lower pregnancy rate remains a concern. Recent studies showed that favorable outcome regarding SET can be achieved by selecting embryos with “more normal” genetic components. We explored the use of rapid array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to select blastocysts for fresh SET and compared with the protocols adopting vitrified (ultrarapidly frozen) embryo transfer cycle. Validation of the rapid protocol of aCGH and comparison of the result with the regular protocol of aCGH and next generation sequencing (NGS) are also performed. RESULTS: First-time IVF patients with normal karyotype (n = 21) were enrolled for elective fresh SET cycle (n = 8; designated as fresh SET group) or vitrified embryo transfer cycle (n = 13; designated as vitrified ET group) coupling with comprehensive chromosomal screening by a 9-h rapid aCGH from Day 5 trophectoderm (TE) biopsy. In fresh SET group, 86 blastocysts (10.8 blastocysts/patient) were biopsied and analyzed. Aneuploidy was detected in 53.5 % (46/86) of the biopsied blastocysts. All patients had a single embryo transferred on the following day. The clinical pregnancy rate was 87.5 % (7/8) and the ongoing pregnancy rate was 62.5 % (5/8). In vitrified ET group, 58 blastocysts (4.5 blastocysts/patient) were biopsied and 56 blastocysts were analyzed. Aneuploidy was detected in 39.3 % (22/56) of biopsies. The patients accepted for SET or double embryos transfer (DET) in non-stimulated cycles. The clinical pregnancy rate and the ongoing pregnancy rate was 76.9 % (10/13) and 53.8 % (7/13) respectively. Spontaneous abortions occurred in both of the two patient groups. In the series of fresh SET group, no twin pregnancy was noted and at least one healthy baby had been born at gestational age (GA) 37(+6) weeks when submission. The results of PGS by rapid aCGH, regular aCGH and NGS were comparable in most occasions. CONCLUSION: This study evaluates the use of rapid aCGH to select blastocysts for fresh SET and demonstrates its feasibility in a real clinical IVF program. A successful livebirth is achieved and the favorable outcome is superior to the protocol adopting vitrified ET cycle in our own setting. Additional studies are needed to verify this pilot data and validate its application in large randomized trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4802588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48025882016-03-22 A pilot proof-of-principle study to compare fresh and vitrified cycle preimplantation genetic screening by chromosome microarray and next generation sequencing Ma, Gwo-Chin Chen, Hsin-Fu Yang, Yu-Shih Lin, Wen-Hsiang Tsai, Feng-Po Lin, Chi-Fang Chiu, Chi Chen, Ming Mol Cytogenet Research BACKGROUND: Single embryo transfer (SET) has been utilized as a strategy to reduce the chance of multifetal gestations in in vitro fertilization (IVF) but lower pregnancy rate remains a concern. Recent studies showed that favorable outcome regarding SET can be achieved by selecting embryos with “more normal” genetic components. We explored the use of rapid array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to select blastocysts for fresh SET and compared with the protocols adopting vitrified (ultrarapidly frozen) embryo transfer cycle. Validation of the rapid protocol of aCGH and comparison of the result with the regular protocol of aCGH and next generation sequencing (NGS) are also performed. RESULTS: First-time IVF patients with normal karyotype (n = 21) were enrolled for elective fresh SET cycle (n = 8; designated as fresh SET group) or vitrified embryo transfer cycle (n = 13; designated as vitrified ET group) coupling with comprehensive chromosomal screening by a 9-h rapid aCGH from Day 5 trophectoderm (TE) biopsy. In fresh SET group, 86 blastocysts (10.8 blastocysts/patient) were biopsied and analyzed. Aneuploidy was detected in 53.5 % (46/86) of the biopsied blastocysts. All patients had a single embryo transferred on the following day. The clinical pregnancy rate was 87.5 % (7/8) and the ongoing pregnancy rate was 62.5 % (5/8). In vitrified ET group, 58 blastocysts (4.5 blastocysts/patient) were biopsied and 56 blastocysts were analyzed. Aneuploidy was detected in 39.3 % (22/56) of biopsies. The patients accepted for SET or double embryos transfer (DET) in non-stimulated cycles. The clinical pregnancy rate and the ongoing pregnancy rate was 76.9 % (10/13) and 53.8 % (7/13) respectively. Spontaneous abortions occurred in both of the two patient groups. In the series of fresh SET group, no twin pregnancy was noted and at least one healthy baby had been born at gestational age (GA) 37(+6) weeks when submission. The results of PGS by rapid aCGH, regular aCGH and NGS were comparable in most occasions. CONCLUSION: This study evaluates the use of rapid aCGH to select blastocysts for fresh SET and demonstrates its feasibility in a real clinical IVF program. A successful livebirth is achieved and the favorable outcome is superior to the protocol adopting vitrified ET cycle in our own setting. Additional studies are needed to verify this pilot data and validate its application in large randomized trials. BioMed Central 2016-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4802588/ /pubmed/27006692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-016-0238-8 Text en © Ma et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Ma, Gwo-Chin
Chen, Hsin-Fu
Yang, Yu-Shih
Lin, Wen-Hsiang
Tsai, Feng-Po
Lin, Chi-Fang
Chiu, Chi
Chen, Ming
A pilot proof-of-principle study to compare fresh and vitrified cycle preimplantation genetic screening by chromosome microarray and next generation sequencing
title A pilot proof-of-principle study to compare fresh and vitrified cycle preimplantation genetic screening by chromosome microarray and next generation sequencing
title_full A pilot proof-of-principle study to compare fresh and vitrified cycle preimplantation genetic screening by chromosome microarray and next generation sequencing
title_fullStr A pilot proof-of-principle study to compare fresh and vitrified cycle preimplantation genetic screening by chromosome microarray and next generation sequencing
title_full_unstemmed A pilot proof-of-principle study to compare fresh and vitrified cycle preimplantation genetic screening by chromosome microarray and next generation sequencing
title_short A pilot proof-of-principle study to compare fresh and vitrified cycle preimplantation genetic screening by chromosome microarray and next generation sequencing
title_sort pilot proof-of-principle study to compare fresh and vitrified cycle preimplantation genetic screening by chromosome microarray and next generation sequencing
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4802588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27006692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-016-0238-8
work_keys_str_mv AT magwochin apilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing
AT chenhsinfu apilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing
AT yangyushih apilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing
AT linwenhsiang apilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing
AT tsaifengpo apilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing
AT linchifang apilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing
AT chiuchi apilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing
AT chenming apilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing
AT magwochin pilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing
AT chenhsinfu pilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing
AT yangyushih pilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing
AT linwenhsiang pilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing
AT tsaifengpo pilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing
AT linchifang pilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing
AT chiuchi pilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing
AT chenming pilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing