Cargando…
A pilot proof-of-principle study to compare fresh and vitrified cycle preimplantation genetic screening by chromosome microarray and next generation sequencing
BACKGROUND: Single embryo transfer (SET) has been utilized as a strategy to reduce the chance of multifetal gestations in in vitro fertilization (IVF) but lower pregnancy rate remains a concern. Recent studies showed that favorable outcome regarding SET can be achieved by selecting embryos with “mor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4802588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27006692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-016-0238-8 |
_version_ | 1782422750513594368 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Gwo-Chin Chen, Hsin-Fu Yang, Yu-Shih Lin, Wen-Hsiang Tsai, Feng-Po Lin, Chi-Fang Chiu, Chi Chen, Ming |
author_facet | Ma, Gwo-Chin Chen, Hsin-Fu Yang, Yu-Shih Lin, Wen-Hsiang Tsai, Feng-Po Lin, Chi-Fang Chiu, Chi Chen, Ming |
author_sort | Ma, Gwo-Chin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Single embryo transfer (SET) has been utilized as a strategy to reduce the chance of multifetal gestations in in vitro fertilization (IVF) but lower pregnancy rate remains a concern. Recent studies showed that favorable outcome regarding SET can be achieved by selecting embryos with “more normal” genetic components. We explored the use of rapid array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to select blastocysts for fresh SET and compared with the protocols adopting vitrified (ultrarapidly frozen) embryo transfer cycle. Validation of the rapid protocol of aCGH and comparison of the result with the regular protocol of aCGH and next generation sequencing (NGS) are also performed. RESULTS: First-time IVF patients with normal karyotype (n = 21) were enrolled for elective fresh SET cycle (n = 8; designated as fresh SET group) or vitrified embryo transfer cycle (n = 13; designated as vitrified ET group) coupling with comprehensive chromosomal screening by a 9-h rapid aCGH from Day 5 trophectoderm (TE) biopsy. In fresh SET group, 86 blastocysts (10.8 blastocysts/patient) were biopsied and analyzed. Aneuploidy was detected in 53.5 % (46/86) of the biopsied blastocysts. All patients had a single embryo transferred on the following day. The clinical pregnancy rate was 87.5 % (7/8) and the ongoing pregnancy rate was 62.5 % (5/8). In vitrified ET group, 58 blastocysts (4.5 blastocysts/patient) were biopsied and 56 blastocysts were analyzed. Aneuploidy was detected in 39.3 % (22/56) of biopsies. The patients accepted for SET or double embryos transfer (DET) in non-stimulated cycles. The clinical pregnancy rate and the ongoing pregnancy rate was 76.9 % (10/13) and 53.8 % (7/13) respectively. Spontaneous abortions occurred in both of the two patient groups. In the series of fresh SET group, no twin pregnancy was noted and at least one healthy baby had been born at gestational age (GA) 37(+6) weeks when submission. The results of PGS by rapid aCGH, regular aCGH and NGS were comparable in most occasions. CONCLUSION: This study evaluates the use of rapid aCGH to select blastocysts for fresh SET and demonstrates its feasibility in a real clinical IVF program. A successful livebirth is achieved and the favorable outcome is superior to the protocol adopting vitrified ET cycle in our own setting. Additional studies are needed to verify this pilot data and validate its application in large randomized trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4802588 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48025882016-03-22 A pilot proof-of-principle study to compare fresh and vitrified cycle preimplantation genetic screening by chromosome microarray and next generation sequencing Ma, Gwo-Chin Chen, Hsin-Fu Yang, Yu-Shih Lin, Wen-Hsiang Tsai, Feng-Po Lin, Chi-Fang Chiu, Chi Chen, Ming Mol Cytogenet Research BACKGROUND: Single embryo transfer (SET) has been utilized as a strategy to reduce the chance of multifetal gestations in in vitro fertilization (IVF) but lower pregnancy rate remains a concern. Recent studies showed that favorable outcome regarding SET can be achieved by selecting embryos with “more normal” genetic components. We explored the use of rapid array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to select blastocysts for fresh SET and compared with the protocols adopting vitrified (ultrarapidly frozen) embryo transfer cycle. Validation of the rapid protocol of aCGH and comparison of the result with the regular protocol of aCGH and next generation sequencing (NGS) are also performed. RESULTS: First-time IVF patients with normal karyotype (n = 21) were enrolled for elective fresh SET cycle (n = 8; designated as fresh SET group) or vitrified embryo transfer cycle (n = 13; designated as vitrified ET group) coupling with comprehensive chromosomal screening by a 9-h rapid aCGH from Day 5 trophectoderm (TE) biopsy. In fresh SET group, 86 blastocysts (10.8 blastocysts/patient) were biopsied and analyzed. Aneuploidy was detected in 53.5 % (46/86) of the biopsied blastocysts. All patients had a single embryo transferred on the following day. The clinical pregnancy rate was 87.5 % (7/8) and the ongoing pregnancy rate was 62.5 % (5/8). In vitrified ET group, 58 blastocysts (4.5 blastocysts/patient) were biopsied and 56 blastocysts were analyzed. Aneuploidy was detected in 39.3 % (22/56) of biopsies. The patients accepted for SET or double embryos transfer (DET) in non-stimulated cycles. The clinical pregnancy rate and the ongoing pregnancy rate was 76.9 % (10/13) and 53.8 % (7/13) respectively. Spontaneous abortions occurred in both of the two patient groups. In the series of fresh SET group, no twin pregnancy was noted and at least one healthy baby had been born at gestational age (GA) 37(+6) weeks when submission. The results of PGS by rapid aCGH, regular aCGH and NGS were comparable in most occasions. CONCLUSION: This study evaluates the use of rapid aCGH to select blastocysts for fresh SET and demonstrates its feasibility in a real clinical IVF program. A successful livebirth is achieved and the favorable outcome is superior to the protocol adopting vitrified ET cycle in our own setting. Additional studies are needed to verify this pilot data and validate its application in large randomized trials. BioMed Central 2016-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4802588/ /pubmed/27006692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-016-0238-8 Text en © Ma et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Ma, Gwo-Chin Chen, Hsin-Fu Yang, Yu-Shih Lin, Wen-Hsiang Tsai, Feng-Po Lin, Chi-Fang Chiu, Chi Chen, Ming A pilot proof-of-principle study to compare fresh and vitrified cycle preimplantation genetic screening by chromosome microarray and next generation sequencing |
title | A pilot proof-of-principle study to compare fresh and vitrified cycle preimplantation genetic screening by chromosome microarray and next generation sequencing |
title_full | A pilot proof-of-principle study to compare fresh and vitrified cycle preimplantation genetic screening by chromosome microarray and next generation sequencing |
title_fullStr | A pilot proof-of-principle study to compare fresh and vitrified cycle preimplantation genetic screening by chromosome microarray and next generation sequencing |
title_full_unstemmed | A pilot proof-of-principle study to compare fresh and vitrified cycle preimplantation genetic screening by chromosome microarray and next generation sequencing |
title_short | A pilot proof-of-principle study to compare fresh and vitrified cycle preimplantation genetic screening by chromosome microarray and next generation sequencing |
title_sort | pilot proof-of-principle study to compare fresh and vitrified cycle preimplantation genetic screening by chromosome microarray and next generation sequencing |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4802588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27006692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-016-0238-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT magwochin apilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing AT chenhsinfu apilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing AT yangyushih apilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing AT linwenhsiang apilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing AT tsaifengpo apilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing AT linchifang apilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing AT chiuchi apilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing AT chenming apilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing AT magwochin pilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing AT chenhsinfu pilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing AT yangyushih pilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing AT linwenhsiang pilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing AT tsaifengpo pilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing AT linchifang pilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing AT chiuchi pilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing AT chenming pilotproofofprinciplestudytocomparefreshandvitrifiedcyclepreimplantationgeneticscreeningbychromosomemicroarrayandnextgenerationsequencing |