Cargando…
Comparative effectiveness of home dialysis therapies: a matched cohort study
BACKGROUND: Home dialysis is being increasingly promoted among patients with end-stage renal disease, but the comparative effectiveness of home hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients receiving home daily hemodialysis have reduced mortality risk comp...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4802626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27006781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40697-016-0105-x |
_version_ | 1782422759189512192 |
---|---|
author | Nesrallah, Gihad E. Li, Lihua Suri, Rita S. |
author_facet | Nesrallah, Gihad E. Li, Lihua Suri, Rita S. |
author_sort | Nesrallah, Gihad E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Home dialysis is being increasingly promoted among patients with end-stage renal disease, but the comparative effectiveness of home hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients receiving home daily hemodialysis have reduced mortality risk compared with matched patients receiving home peritoneal dialysis. DESIGN: This study is an observational, propensity-matched, new-user cohort study. SETTING: Linked electronic data were from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) and a large dialysis provider’s database. PATIENTS: The patients were adults receiving in-center hemodialysis in the USA between 2004 and 2011 and registered in the USRDS. MEASUREMENTS: Baseline comorbidities, demographics, and outcomes for both groups were ascertained from the United States Renal Data System. METHODS: We identified 3142 consecutive adult patients initiating home daily hemodialysis (≥5 days/week for ≥1.5 h/day) and matched 2688 of them by propensity score to 2688 contemporaneous US patients initiating home peritoneal dialysis. We used Cox regression to compare all-cause mortality between groups. RESULTS: After matching, the two groups were well balanced on all baseline characteristics. Mean age was 51 years, 66 % were male, 72 % were white, and 29 % had diabetes. During 10,221 patient-years of follow-up, 1493/5336 patients died. There were significantly fewer deaths among patients receiving home daily hemodialysis than those receiving peritoneal dialysis (12.7 vs 16.7 deaths per 100 patient-years, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) 0.75; 95 % CI 0.68–0.82; p < 0.001). Similar results were noted with several different analytic methods and for all pre-specified subgroups. LIMITATIONS: We cannot exclude residual confounding in this observational study. CONCLUSIONS: Home daily hemodialysis was associated with lower mortality risk than home peritoneal dialysis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40697-016-0105-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4802626 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48026262016-03-23 Comparative effectiveness of home dialysis therapies: a matched cohort study Nesrallah, Gihad E. Li, Lihua Suri, Rita S. Can J Kidney Health Dis Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Home dialysis is being increasingly promoted among patients with end-stage renal disease, but the comparative effectiveness of home hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients receiving home daily hemodialysis have reduced mortality risk compared with matched patients receiving home peritoneal dialysis. DESIGN: This study is an observational, propensity-matched, new-user cohort study. SETTING: Linked electronic data were from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) and a large dialysis provider’s database. PATIENTS: The patients were adults receiving in-center hemodialysis in the USA between 2004 and 2011 and registered in the USRDS. MEASUREMENTS: Baseline comorbidities, demographics, and outcomes for both groups were ascertained from the United States Renal Data System. METHODS: We identified 3142 consecutive adult patients initiating home daily hemodialysis (≥5 days/week for ≥1.5 h/day) and matched 2688 of them by propensity score to 2688 contemporaneous US patients initiating home peritoneal dialysis. We used Cox regression to compare all-cause mortality between groups. RESULTS: After matching, the two groups were well balanced on all baseline characteristics. Mean age was 51 years, 66 % were male, 72 % were white, and 29 % had diabetes. During 10,221 patient-years of follow-up, 1493/5336 patients died. There were significantly fewer deaths among patients receiving home daily hemodialysis than those receiving peritoneal dialysis (12.7 vs 16.7 deaths per 100 patient-years, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) 0.75; 95 % CI 0.68–0.82; p < 0.001). Similar results were noted with several different analytic methods and for all pre-specified subgroups. LIMITATIONS: We cannot exclude residual confounding in this observational study. CONCLUSIONS: Home daily hemodialysis was associated with lower mortality risk than home peritoneal dialysis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40697-016-0105-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4802626/ /pubmed/27006781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40697-016-0105-x Text en © Nesrallah et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Nesrallah, Gihad E. Li, Lihua Suri, Rita S. Comparative effectiveness of home dialysis therapies: a matched cohort study |
title | Comparative effectiveness of home dialysis therapies: a matched cohort study |
title_full | Comparative effectiveness of home dialysis therapies: a matched cohort study |
title_fullStr | Comparative effectiveness of home dialysis therapies: a matched cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative effectiveness of home dialysis therapies: a matched cohort study |
title_short | Comparative effectiveness of home dialysis therapies: a matched cohort study |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of home dialysis therapies: a matched cohort study |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4802626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27006781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40697-016-0105-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nesrallahgihade comparativeeffectivenessofhomedialysistherapiesamatchedcohortstudy AT lilihua comparativeeffectivenessofhomedialysistherapiesamatchedcohortstudy AT suriritas comparativeeffectivenessofhomedialysistherapiesamatchedcohortstudy |