Cargando…

Why do some women choose to freebirth in the UK? An interpretative phenomenological study

BACKGROUND: Freebirthing or unassisted birth is the active choice made by a woman to birth without a trained professional present, even where there is access to maternity provision. This is a radical childbirth choice, which has potential morbidity and mortality risks for mother and baby. While a nu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feeley, Claire, Thomson, Gill
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4802706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27000100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0847-6
_version_ 1782422777233408000
author Feeley, Claire
Thomson, Gill
author_facet Feeley, Claire
Thomson, Gill
author_sort Feeley, Claire
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Freebirthing or unassisted birth is the active choice made by a woman to birth without a trained professional present, even where there is access to maternity provision. This is a radical childbirth choice, which has potential morbidity and mortality risks for mother and baby. While a number of studies have explored women’s freebirth experiences, there has been no research undertaken in the UK. The aim of this study was to explore and identify what influenced women’s decision to freebirth in a UK context. METHODS: An interpretive phenomenological approach was adopted. Advertisements were posted on freebirth websites, and ten women participated in the study by completing a narrative (n = 9) and/or taking part in an in-depth interview (n = 10). Data analysis was carried out using interpretative methods informed by Heidegger and Gadamer’s hermeneutic-phenomenological concepts. RESULTS: Three main themes emerged from the data. Contextualising herstory describes how the participants’ backgrounds (personal and/or childbirth related) influenced their decision making. Diverging paths of decision making provides more detailed insights into how and why women’s different backgrounds and experiences of childbirth and maternity care influenced their decision to freebirth. Converging path of decision making, outlines the commonalities in women’s narratives in terms of how they sought to validate their decision to freebirth, such as through self-directed research, enlisting the support of others and conceptualising risk. CONCLUSION: The UK based midwifery philosophy of woman-centred care that tailors care to individual needs is not always carried out, leaving women to feel disillusioned, unsafe and opting out of any form of professionalised care for their births. Maternity services need to provide support for women who have experienced a previous traumatic birth. Midwives also need to help restore relationships with women, and co-create birth plans that enable women to be active agents in their birthing decisions even if they challenge normative practices. The fact that women choose to freebirth in order to create a calm, quiet birthing space that is free from clinical interruptions and that enhances the physiology of labour, should be a key consideration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4802706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48027062016-03-22 Why do some women choose to freebirth in the UK? An interpretative phenomenological study Feeley, Claire Thomson, Gill BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Freebirthing or unassisted birth is the active choice made by a woman to birth without a trained professional present, even where there is access to maternity provision. This is a radical childbirth choice, which has potential morbidity and mortality risks for mother and baby. While a number of studies have explored women’s freebirth experiences, there has been no research undertaken in the UK. The aim of this study was to explore and identify what influenced women’s decision to freebirth in a UK context. METHODS: An interpretive phenomenological approach was adopted. Advertisements were posted on freebirth websites, and ten women participated in the study by completing a narrative (n = 9) and/or taking part in an in-depth interview (n = 10). Data analysis was carried out using interpretative methods informed by Heidegger and Gadamer’s hermeneutic-phenomenological concepts. RESULTS: Three main themes emerged from the data. Contextualising herstory describes how the participants’ backgrounds (personal and/or childbirth related) influenced their decision making. Diverging paths of decision making provides more detailed insights into how and why women’s different backgrounds and experiences of childbirth and maternity care influenced their decision to freebirth. Converging path of decision making, outlines the commonalities in women’s narratives in terms of how they sought to validate their decision to freebirth, such as through self-directed research, enlisting the support of others and conceptualising risk. CONCLUSION: The UK based midwifery philosophy of woman-centred care that tailors care to individual needs is not always carried out, leaving women to feel disillusioned, unsafe and opting out of any form of professionalised care for their births. Maternity services need to provide support for women who have experienced a previous traumatic birth. Midwives also need to help restore relationships with women, and co-create birth plans that enable women to be active agents in their birthing decisions even if they challenge normative practices. The fact that women choose to freebirth in order to create a calm, quiet birthing space that is free from clinical interruptions and that enhances the physiology of labour, should be a key consideration. BioMed Central 2016-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4802706/ /pubmed/27000100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0847-6 Text en © Feeley and Thomson. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Feeley, Claire
Thomson, Gill
Why do some women choose to freebirth in the UK? An interpretative phenomenological study
title Why do some women choose to freebirth in the UK? An interpretative phenomenological study
title_full Why do some women choose to freebirth in the UK? An interpretative phenomenological study
title_fullStr Why do some women choose to freebirth in the UK? An interpretative phenomenological study
title_full_unstemmed Why do some women choose to freebirth in the UK? An interpretative phenomenological study
title_short Why do some women choose to freebirth in the UK? An interpretative phenomenological study
title_sort why do some women choose to freebirth in the uk? an interpretative phenomenological study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4802706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27000100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0847-6
work_keys_str_mv AT feeleyclaire whydosomewomenchoosetofreebirthintheukaninterpretativephenomenologicalstudy
AT thomsongill whydosomewomenchoosetofreebirthintheukaninterpretativephenomenologicalstudy