Cargando…

Creationism and intelligent design are incompatible with scientific progress: A response to Shanta and Vêdanta

In a recent opinion paper, B.K. Shanta claims science leaves no room for the subjective aspect of consciousness, and in doing so, attacks both origin of life and evolutionary research. He claims Vêdanta, one of the 6 orthodox schools of Hindu philosophy, offers an explanation: “the origin of everyth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Caetano-Anollés, Gustavo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4802803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27066185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1123356
_version_ 1782422792472363008
author Caetano-Anollés, Gustavo
author_facet Caetano-Anollés, Gustavo
author_sort Caetano-Anollés, Gustavo
collection PubMed
description In a recent opinion paper, B.K. Shanta claims science leaves no room for the subjective aspect of consciousness, and in doing so, attacks both origin of life and evolutionary research. He claims Vêdanta, one of the 6 orthodox schools of Hindu philosophy, offers an explanation: “the origin of everything material and nonmaterial is sentient and absolute.” Here I discuss how the pseudoscience of these creationist views, which are aligned with Intelligent Design, are incompatible with scientific progress and should not be published in scientific journals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4802803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48028032016-04-08 Creationism and intelligent design are incompatible with scientific progress: A response to Shanta and Vêdanta Caetano-Anollés, Gustavo Commun Integr Biol Opinion Article In a recent opinion paper, B.K. Shanta claims science leaves no room for the subjective aspect of consciousness, and in doing so, attacks both origin of life and evolutionary research. He claims Vêdanta, one of the 6 orthodox schools of Hindu philosophy, offers an explanation: “the origin of everything material and nonmaterial is sentient and absolute.” Here I discuss how the pseudoscience of these creationist views, which are aligned with Intelligent Design, are incompatible with scientific progress and should not be published in scientific journals. Taylor & Francis 2016-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4802803/ /pubmed/27066185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1123356 Text en © 2016 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.
spellingShingle Opinion Article
Caetano-Anollés, Gustavo
Creationism and intelligent design are incompatible with scientific progress: A response to Shanta and Vêdanta
title Creationism and intelligent design are incompatible with scientific progress: A response to Shanta and Vêdanta
title_full Creationism and intelligent design are incompatible with scientific progress: A response to Shanta and Vêdanta
title_fullStr Creationism and intelligent design are incompatible with scientific progress: A response to Shanta and Vêdanta
title_full_unstemmed Creationism and intelligent design are incompatible with scientific progress: A response to Shanta and Vêdanta
title_short Creationism and intelligent design are incompatible with scientific progress: A response to Shanta and Vêdanta
title_sort creationism and intelligent design are incompatible with scientific progress: a response to shanta and vêdanta
topic Opinion Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4802803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27066185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1123356
work_keys_str_mv AT caetanoanollesgustavo creationismandintelligentdesignareincompatiblewithscientificprogressaresponsetoshantaandvedanta