Cargando…

Effects of a behavioral and health literacy intervention to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages: a randomized-controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Despite excessive consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB), little is known about behavioral interventions to reduce SSB intake among adults, particularly in medically-underserved rural communities. This type 1 effectiveness-implementation hybrid RCT, conducted in 2012–2014, applie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zoellner, Jamie M., Hedrick, Valisa E., You, Wen, Chen, Yvonnes, Davy, Brenda M., Porter, Kathleen J., Bailey, Angela, Lane, Hannah, Alexander, Ramine, Estabrooks, Paul A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4802861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27000402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0362-1
_version_ 1782422802857459712
author Zoellner, Jamie M.
Hedrick, Valisa E.
You, Wen
Chen, Yvonnes
Davy, Brenda M.
Porter, Kathleen J.
Bailey, Angela
Lane, Hannah
Alexander, Ramine
Estabrooks, Paul A.
author_facet Zoellner, Jamie M.
Hedrick, Valisa E.
You, Wen
Chen, Yvonnes
Davy, Brenda M.
Porter, Kathleen J.
Bailey, Angela
Lane, Hannah
Alexander, Ramine
Estabrooks, Paul A.
author_sort Zoellner, Jamie M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite excessive consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB), little is known about behavioral interventions to reduce SSB intake among adults, particularly in medically-underserved rural communities. This type 1 effectiveness-implementation hybrid RCT, conducted in 2012–2014, applied the RE-AIM framework and was designed to assess the effectiveness of a behavioral intervention targeting SSB consumption (SIPsmartER) when compared to an intervention targeting physical activity (MoveMore) and to determine if health literacy influenced retention, engagement or outcomes. METHODS: Guided by the Theory of Planned Behavior and health literacy strategies, the 6 month multi-component intervention for both conditions included three small-group classes, one live teach-back call, and 11 interactive voice response calls. Validated measures were used to assess SSB consumption (primary outcome) and all secondary outcomes including physical activity behaviors, theory-based constructs, quality of life, media literacy, anthropometric, and biological outcomes. RESULTS: Targeting a medically-underserved rural region in southwest Virginia, 1056 adult participants were screened, 620 (59 %) eligible, 301 (49 %) enrolled and randomized, and 296 included in these 2015 analyses. Participants were 93 % Caucasian, 81 % female, 31 % ≤ high-school educated, 43 % < $14,999 household income, and 33 % low health literate. Retention rates (74 %) and program engagement was not statistically different between conditions. Compared to MoveMore, SIPsmartER participants significantly decreased SSB kcals and BMI at 6 months. SIPsmartER participants significantly decreased SSB intake by 227 (95 % CI = −326,−127, p < 0.001) kcals/day from baseline to 6 months when compared to the decrease of 53 (95 % CI = −88,−17, p < 0.01) kcals/day among MoveMore participants (p < 0.001). SIPsmartER participants decreased BMI by 0.21 (95 % CI = −0.35,−0.06; p < 0.01) kg/m(2) from baseline to 6 months when compared to the non-significant 0.10 (95 % CI = −0.23, 0.43; NS) kg/m(2) gain among MoveMore participants (p < 0.05). Significant 0–6 month effects were observed for about half of the theory-based constructs, but for no biological outcomes. Health literacy status did not influence retention rates, engagement or outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: SIPsmartER is an effective intervention to decrease SSB consumption among adults and is promising for translation into practice settings. SIPsmartER also yielded small, yet significant, improvements in BMI. By using health literacy-focused strategies, the intervention was robust in achieving reductions for participants of varying health literacy status. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov; ID: NCT02193009.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4802861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48028612016-03-23 Effects of a behavioral and health literacy intervention to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages: a randomized-controlled trial Zoellner, Jamie M. Hedrick, Valisa E. You, Wen Chen, Yvonnes Davy, Brenda M. Porter, Kathleen J. Bailey, Angela Lane, Hannah Alexander, Ramine Estabrooks, Paul A. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Despite excessive consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB), little is known about behavioral interventions to reduce SSB intake among adults, particularly in medically-underserved rural communities. This type 1 effectiveness-implementation hybrid RCT, conducted in 2012–2014, applied the RE-AIM framework and was designed to assess the effectiveness of a behavioral intervention targeting SSB consumption (SIPsmartER) when compared to an intervention targeting physical activity (MoveMore) and to determine if health literacy influenced retention, engagement or outcomes. METHODS: Guided by the Theory of Planned Behavior and health literacy strategies, the 6 month multi-component intervention for both conditions included three small-group classes, one live teach-back call, and 11 interactive voice response calls. Validated measures were used to assess SSB consumption (primary outcome) and all secondary outcomes including physical activity behaviors, theory-based constructs, quality of life, media literacy, anthropometric, and biological outcomes. RESULTS: Targeting a medically-underserved rural region in southwest Virginia, 1056 adult participants were screened, 620 (59 %) eligible, 301 (49 %) enrolled and randomized, and 296 included in these 2015 analyses. Participants were 93 % Caucasian, 81 % female, 31 % ≤ high-school educated, 43 % < $14,999 household income, and 33 % low health literate. Retention rates (74 %) and program engagement was not statistically different between conditions. Compared to MoveMore, SIPsmartER participants significantly decreased SSB kcals and BMI at 6 months. SIPsmartER participants significantly decreased SSB intake by 227 (95 % CI = −326,−127, p < 0.001) kcals/day from baseline to 6 months when compared to the decrease of 53 (95 % CI = −88,−17, p < 0.01) kcals/day among MoveMore participants (p < 0.001). SIPsmartER participants decreased BMI by 0.21 (95 % CI = −0.35,−0.06; p < 0.01) kg/m(2) from baseline to 6 months when compared to the non-significant 0.10 (95 % CI = −0.23, 0.43; NS) kg/m(2) gain among MoveMore participants (p < 0.05). Significant 0–6 month effects were observed for about half of the theory-based constructs, but for no biological outcomes. Health literacy status did not influence retention rates, engagement or outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: SIPsmartER is an effective intervention to decrease SSB consumption among adults and is promising for translation into practice settings. SIPsmartER also yielded small, yet significant, improvements in BMI. By using health literacy-focused strategies, the intervention was robust in achieving reductions for participants of varying health literacy status. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov; ID: NCT02193009. BioMed Central 2016-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4802861/ /pubmed/27000402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0362-1 Text en © Zoellner et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Zoellner, Jamie M.
Hedrick, Valisa E.
You, Wen
Chen, Yvonnes
Davy, Brenda M.
Porter, Kathleen J.
Bailey, Angela
Lane, Hannah
Alexander, Ramine
Estabrooks, Paul A.
Effects of a behavioral and health literacy intervention to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages: a randomized-controlled trial
title Effects of a behavioral and health literacy intervention to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages: a randomized-controlled trial
title_full Effects of a behavioral and health literacy intervention to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages: a randomized-controlled trial
title_fullStr Effects of a behavioral and health literacy intervention to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages: a randomized-controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of a behavioral and health literacy intervention to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages: a randomized-controlled trial
title_short Effects of a behavioral and health literacy intervention to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages: a randomized-controlled trial
title_sort effects of a behavioral and health literacy intervention to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages: a randomized-controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4802861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27000402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0362-1
work_keys_str_mv AT zoellnerjamiem effectsofabehavioralandhealthliteracyinterventiontoreducesugarsweetenedbeveragesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hedrickvalisae effectsofabehavioralandhealthliteracyinterventiontoreducesugarsweetenedbeveragesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT youwen effectsofabehavioralandhealthliteracyinterventiontoreducesugarsweetenedbeveragesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chenyvonnes effectsofabehavioralandhealthliteracyinterventiontoreducesugarsweetenedbeveragesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT davybrendam effectsofabehavioralandhealthliteracyinterventiontoreducesugarsweetenedbeveragesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT porterkathleenj effectsofabehavioralandhealthliteracyinterventiontoreducesugarsweetenedbeveragesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT baileyangela effectsofabehavioralandhealthliteracyinterventiontoreducesugarsweetenedbeveragesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lanehannah effectsofabehavioralandhealthliteracyinterventiontoreducesugarsweetenedbeveragesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT alexanderramine effectsofabehavioralandhealthliteracyinterventiontoreducesugarsweetenedbeveragesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT estabrookspaula effectsofabehavioralandhealthliteracyinterventiontoreducesugarsweetenedbeveragesarandomizedcontrolledtrial