Cargando…

Relative compatibility of Schistosoma mansoni with Biomphalaria sudanica and B. pfeifferi from Kenya as assessed by PCR amplification of the S. mansoni ND5 gene in conjunction with traditional methods

BACKGROUND: Schistosoma mansoni is hosted by several species of Biomphalaria spp. snails in Africa. We were interested in determining if there were differences in compatibility of S. mansoni with Biomphalaria sudanica from Lake Victoria, or with B. pfeifferi from streams and smaller water bodies in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Lijun, Zhang, Si-Ming, Mutuku, Martin W., Mkoji, Gerald M., Loker, Eric S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4802880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27000855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1457-x
_version_ 1782422805834366976
author Lu, Lijun
Zhang, Si-Ming
Mutuku, Martin W.
Mkoji, Gerald M.
Loker, Eric S.
author_facet Lu, Lijun
Zhang, Si-Ming
Mutuku, Martin W.
Mkoji, Gerald M.
Loker, Eric S.
author_sort Lu, Lijun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Schistosoma mansoni is hosted by several species of Biomphalaria spp. snails in Africa. We were interested in determining if there were differences in compatibility of S. mansoni with Biomphalaria sudanica from Lake Victoria, or with B. pfeifferi from streams and smaller water bodies in Kenya. Does this parasite develop with equal efficiency in both snail species, and does this have implications for transmission in different habitat types? METHODS: Primers for PCR amplification of the S. mansoni ND5 gene were designed and tested for sensitivity and specificity. We exposed laboratory-reared B. sudanica and field-derived B. pfeifferi to single miracidium infections and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 days post-exposure (dpe), snails were extracted for the PCR assay. Snails were also shed for cercariae and/or dissected prior to extraction. Additionally, B. sudanica and B. pfeifferi were collected from field locations and tested with the PCR assay. RESULTS: The ND5 PCR assay was sensitive (>0.1 fg S. mansoni genomic DNA) and allowed S. mansoni to be differentiated from other relevant schistosome species or snails. The number of PCR positive snails at 1–4 dpe was higher for B. pfeifferi than for B. sudanica, but not significantly so (P = 0.052). From 8–24 dpe, more B. pfeifferi harbored successfully developing parasites (positive by both dissection and PCR) than did B. sudanica (P = 0.008). At 40 dpe, more B. pfeifferi than B. sudanica shed cercariae or harbored dissection positive/PCR positive infections (P < 0.001). Both immature and failed (dissection negative but PCR positive) S. mansoni infections could also be detected in naturally infected snails of both species. CONCLUSIONS: The PCR assay detected S. mansoni infections in snails exposed to one miracidium for one day. Both B. sudanica and B. pfeifferi supported full development of S. mansoni, but B. pfeifferi was more compatible, with significantly more dissection positive/PCR positive or shedding infections, and significantly fewer failed infections (dissection negative/PCR positive). This highlights the relatively lower compatibility of B. sudanica with S. mansoni, and suggests the factors responsible for incompatibility and how they might affect transmission of S. mansoni in habitats like Lake Victoria deserve additional study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4802880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48028802016-03-23 Relative compatibility of Schistosoma mansoni with Biomphalaria sudanica and B. pfeifferi from Kenya as assessed by PCR amplification of the S. mansoni ND5 gene in conjunction with traditional methods Lu, Lijun Zhang, Si-Ming Mutuku, Martin W. Mkoji, Gerald M. Loker, Eric S. Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Schistosoma mansoni is hosted by several species of Biomphalaria spp. snails in Africa. We were interested in determining if there were differences in compatibility of S. mansoni with Biomphalaria sudanica from Lake Victoria, or with B. pfeifferi from streams and smaller water bodies in Kenya. Does this parasite develop with equal efficiency in both snail species, and does this have implications for transmission in different habitat types? METHODS: Primers for PCR amplification of the S. mansoni ND5 gene were designed and tested for sensitivity and specificity. We exposed laboratory-reared B. sudanica and field-derived B. pfeifferi to single miracidium infections and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 days post-exposure (dpe), snails were extracted for the PCR assay. Snails were also shed for cercariae and/or dissected prior to extraction. Additionally, B. sudanica and B. pfeifferi were collected from field locations and tested with the PCR assay. RESULTS: The ND5 PCR assay was sensitive (>0.1 fg S. mansoni genomic DNA) and allowed S. mansoni to be differentiated from other relevant schistosome species or snails. The number of PCR positive snails at 1–4 dpe was higher for B. pfeifferi than for B. sudanica, but not significantly so (P = 0.052). From 8–24 dpe, more B. pfeifferi harbored successfully developing parasites (positive by both dissection and PCR) than did B. sudanica (P = 0.008). At 40 dpe, more B. pfeifferi than B. sudanica shed cercariae or harbored dissection positive/PCR positive infections (P < 0.001). Both immature and failed (dissection negative but PCR positive) S. mansoni infections could also be detected in naturally infected snails of both species. CONCLUSIONS: The PCR assay detected S. mansoni infections in snails exposed to one miracidium for one day. Both B. sudanica and B. pfeifferi supported full development of S. mansoni, but B. pfeifferi was more compatible, with significantly more dissection positive/PCR positive or shedding infections, and significantly fewer failed infections (dissection negative/PCR positive). This highlights the relatively lower compatibility of B. sudanica with S. mansoni, and suggests the factors responsible for incompatibility and how they might affect transmission of S. mansoni in habitats like Lake Victoria deserve additional study. BioMed Central 2016-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4802880/ /pubmed/27000855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1457-x Text en © Lu et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Lu, Lijun
Zhang, Si-Ming
Mutuku, Martin W.
Mkoji, Gerald M.
Loker, Eric S.
Relative compatibility of Schistosoma mansoni with Biomphalaria sudanica and B. pfeifferi from Kenya as assessed by PCR amplification of the S. mansoni ND5 gene in conjunction with traditional methods
title Relative compatibility of Schistosoma mansoni with Biomphalaria sudanica and B. pfeifferi from Kenya as assessed by PCR amplification of the S. mansoni ND5 gene in conjunction with traditional methods
title_full Relative compatibility of Schistosoma mansoni with Biomphalaria sudanica and B. pfeifferi from Kenya as assessed by PCR amplification of the S. mansoni ND5 gene in conjunction with traditional methods
title_fullStr Relative compatibility of Schistosoma mansoni with Biomphalaria sudanica and B. pfeifferi from Kenya as assessed by PCR amplification of the S. mansoni ND5 gene in conjunction with traditional methods
title_full_unstemmed Relative compatibility of Schistosoma mansoni with Biomphalaria sudanica and B. pfeifferi from Kenya as assessed by PCR amplification of the S. mansoni ND5 gene in conjunction with traditional methods
title_short Relative compatibility of Schistosoma mansoni with Biomphalaria sudanica and B. pfeifferi from Kenya as assessed by PCR amplification of the S. mansoni ND5 gene in conjunction with traditional methods
title_sort relative compatibility of schistosoma mansoni with biomphalaria sudanica and b. pfeifferi from kenya as assessed by pcr amplification of the s. mansoni nd5 gene in conjunction with traditional methods
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4802880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27000855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1457-x
work_keys_str_mv AT lulijun relativecompatibilityofschistosomamansoniwithbiomphalariasudanicaandbpfeifferifromkenyaasassessedbypcramplificationofthesmansonind5geneinconjunctionwithtraditionalmethods
AT zhangsiming relativecompatibilityofschistosomamansoniwithbiomphalariasudanicaandbpfeifferifromkenyaasassessedbypcramplificationofthesmansonind5geneinconjunctionwithtraditionalmethods
AT mutukumartinw relativecompatibilityofschistosomamansoniwithbiomphalariasudanicaandbpfeifferifromkenyaasassessedbypcramplificationofthesmansonind5geneinconjunctionwithtraditionalmethods
AT mkojigeraldm relativecompatibilityofschistosomamansoniwithbiomphalariasudanicaandbpfeifferifromkenyaasassessedbypcramplificationofthesmansonind5geneinconjunctionwithtraditionalmethods
AT lokererics relativecompatibilityofschistosomamansoniwithbiomphalariasudanicaandbpfeifferifromkenyaasassessedbypcramplificationofthesmansonind5geneinconjunctionwithtraditionalmethods