Cargando…
Utility and challenges in intraoperative consultation of spinal lesions by crush smear cytology
BACKGROUND: Various methods are used for intraoperative consultation of spinal lesions. Crush smear cytology is one such method that is accurate, rapid, and allows preservation of tissue for paraffin-embedded sections. AIMS: To study the cytomorphology of various neoplastic and nonneoplastic lesions...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4802933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27057218 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.175629 |
_version_ | 1782422817498726400 |
---|---|
author | Dikondwar, Aparna R. Dani, Aarti A. Gaikwad, Saroj A. Tathe, Shilpa P. Randale, Archana A. Chawhan, Sanjay M. Kumbhalkar, Dinkar T. |
author_facet | Dikondwar, Aparna R. Dani, Aarti A. Gaikwad, Saroj A. Tathe, Shilpa P. Randale, Archana A. Chawhan, Sanjay M. Kumbhalkar, Dinkar T. |
author_sort | Dikondwar, Aparna R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Various methods are used for intraoperative consultation of spinal lesions. Crush smear cytology is one such method that is accurate, rapid, and allows preservation of tissue for paraffin-embedded sections. AIMS: To study the cytomorphology of various neoplastic and nonneoplastic lesions involving and compressing the spinal cord. To evaluate accuracy and discuss diagnostic pitfalls of crush smear cytology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a period of 5 years (January 2008 to October 2012), a total of 57 spinal lesions were referred for intraoperative cytology. In four cases, material was inadequate for evaluation, so we analyzed 53 cases. RESULTS: Majority of lesions were neoplastic accounting for 86.79% whereas nonneoplastic lesions constituted 13.20%. Most of the tumors were low grade (82.92%). Overall accuracy rate was 90.56% with accuracy of 91.30% and 85.71% for neoplastic and inflammatory lesions, respectively. CONCLUSION: Crush smear technique is a simple, reliable, easy, and rapid method for diagnosing neoplastic and inflammatory lesions involving and compressing the spinal cord. It gives an immediate idea of prognosis so that surgeon can modify the operative procedure, if necessary. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4802933 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48029332016-04-07 Utility and challenges in intraoperative consultation of spinal lesions by crush smear cytology Dikondwar, Aparna R. Dani, Aarti A. Gaikwad, Saroj A. Tathe, Shilpa P. Randale, Archana A. Chawhan, Sanjay M. Kumbhalkar, Dinkar T. Asian J Neurosurg Original Article BACKGROUND: Various methods are used for intraoperative consultation of spinal lesions. Crush smear cytology is one such method that is accurate, rapid, and allows preservation of tissue for paraffin-embedded sections. AIMS: To study the cytomorphology of various neoplastic and nonneoplastic lesions involving and compressing the spinal cord. To evaluate accuracy and discuss diagnostic pitfalls of crush smear cytology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a period of 5 years (January 2008 to October 2012), a total of 57 spinal lesions were referred for intraoperative cytology. In four cases, material was inadequate for evaluation, so we analyzed 53 cases. RESULTS: Majority of lesions were neoplastic accounting for 86.79% whereas nonneoplastic lesions constituted 13.20%. Most of the tumors were low grade (82.92%). Overall accuracy rate was 90.56% with accuracy of 91.30% and 85.71% for neoplastic and inflammatory lesions, respectively. CONCLUSION: Crush smear technique is a simple, reliable, easy, and rapid method for diagnosing neoplastic and inflammatory lesions involving and compressing the spinal cord. It gives an immediate idea of prognosis so that surgeon can modify the operative procedure, if necessary. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4802933/ /pubmed/27057218 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.175629 Text en Copyright: © Asian Journal of Neurosurgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Dikondwar, Aparna R. Dani, Aarti A. Gaikwad, Saroj A. Tathe, Shilpa P. Randale, Archana A. Chawhan, Sanjay M. Kumbhalkar, Dinkar T. Utility and challenges in intraoperative consultation of spinal lesions by crush smear cytology |
title | Utility and challenges in intraoperative consultation of spinal lesions by crush smear cytology |
title_full | Utility and challenges in intraoperative consultation of spinal lesions by crush smear cytology |
title_fullStr | Utility and challenges in intraoperative consultation of spinal lesions by crush smear cytology |
title_full_unstemmed | Utility and challenges in intraoperative consultation of spinal lesions by crush smear cytology |
title_short | Utility and challenges in intraoperative consultation of spinal lesions by crush smear cytology |
title_sort | utility and challenges in intraoperative consultation of spinal lesions by crush smear cytology |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4802933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27057218 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.175629 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dikondwaraparnar utilityandchallengesinintraoperativeconsultationofspinallesionsbycrushsmearcytology AT daniaartia utilityandchallengesinintraoperativeconsultationofspinallesionsbycrushsmearcytology AT gaikwadsaroja utilityandchallengesinintraoperativeconsultationofspinallesionsbycrushsmearcytology AT tatheshilpap utilityandchallengesinintraoperativeconsultationofspinallesionsbycrushsmearcytology AT randalearchanaa utilityandchallengesinintraoperativeconsultationofspinallesionsbycrushsmearcytology AT chawhansanjaym utilityandchallengesinintraoperativeconsultationofspinallesionsbycrushsmearcytology AT kumbhalkardinkart utilityandchallengesinintraoperativeconsultationofspinallesionsbycrushsmearcytology |