Cargando…

Neural correlates of cigarette health warning avoidance among smokers

BACKGROUND: Eye-tracking technology has indicated that daily smokers actively avoid pictorial cigarette package health warnings. Avoidance may be due to a pre-cognitive perceptual bias or a higher order cognitive bias, such as reduced emotional processing. Using electroencephalography (EEG), this st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stothart, George, Maynard, Olivia, Lavis, Rosie, Munafò, Marcus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4803020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26874916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.01.025
_version_ 1782422831612559360
author Stothart, George
Maynard, Olivia
Lavis, Rosie
Munafò, Marcus
author_facet Stothart, George
Maynard, Olivia
Lavis, Rosie
Munafò, Marcus
author_sort Stothart, George
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Eye-tracking technology has indicated that daily smokers actively avoid pictorial cigarette package health warnings. Avoidance may be due to a pre-cognitive perceptual bias or a higher order cognitive bias, such as reduced emotional processing. Using electroencephalography (EEG), this study aimed to identify the temporal point at which smokers’ responses to health warnings begin to differ. METHOD: Non-smokers (n = 20) and daily smokers (n = 20) viewed pictorial cigarette package health warnings and neutral control stimuli. These elicited Event Related Potentials reflecting early perceptual processing (visual P1), pre-attentive change detection (visual Mismatch Negativity), selective attentional orientation (P3) and a measure of emotional processing, the Late Positive Potential (LPP). RESULTS: There was no evidence for a difference in P1 responses between smokers and non-smokers. There was no difference in vMMN and P3 amplitude but some evidence for a delay in vMMN latency amongst smokers. There was strong evidence for delayed and reduced LPP to health warning stimuli amongst smokers compared to non-smokers. CONCLUSION: We find no evidence for an early perceptual bias in smokers’ visual perception of health warnings but strong evidence that smokers are less sensitive to the emotional content of cigarette health warnings. Future health warning development should focus on increasing the emotional salience of pictorial health warning content amongst smokers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4803020
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48030202016-04-06 Neural correlates of cigarette health warning avoidance among smokers Stothart, George Maynard, Olivia Lavis, Rosie Munafò, Marcus Drug Alcohol Depend Full Length Article BACKGROUND: Eye-tracking technology has indicated that daily smokers actively avoid pictorial cigarette package health warnings. Avoidance may be due to a pre-cognitive perceptual bias or a higher order cognitive bias, such as reduced emotional processing. Using electroencephalography (EEG), this study aimed to identify the temporal point at which smokers’ responses to health warnings begin to differ. METHOD: Non-smokers (n = 20) and daily smokers (n = 20) viewed pictorial cigarette package health warnings and neutral control stimuli. These elicited Event Related Potentials reflecting early perceptual processing (visual P1), pre-attentive change detection (visual Mismatch Negativity), selective attentional orientation (P3) and a measure of emotional processing, the Late Positive Potential (LPP). RESULTS: There was no evidence for a difference in P1 responses between smokers and non-smokers. There was no difference in vMMN and P3 amplitude but some evidence for a delay in vMMN latency amongst smokers. There was strong evidence for delayed and reduced LPP to health warning stimuli amongst smokers compared to non-smokers. CONCLUSION: We find no evidence for an early perceptual bias in smokers’ visual perception of health warnings but strong evidence that smokers are less sensitive to the emotional content of cigarette health warnings. Future health warning development should focus on increasing the emotional salience of pictorial health warning content amongst smokers. Elsevier 2016-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4803020/ /pubmed/26874916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.01.025 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Full Length Article
Stothart, George
Maynard, Olivia
Lavis, Rosie
Munafò, Marcus
Neural correlates of cigarette health warning avoidance among smokers
title Neural correlates of cigarette health warning avoidance among smokers
title_full Neural correlates of cigarette health warning avoidance among smokers
title_fullStr Neural correlates of cigarette health warning avoidance among smokers
title_full_unstemmed Neural correlates of cigarette health warning avoidance among smokers
title_short Neural correlates of cigarette health warning avoidance among smokers
title_sort neural correlates of cigarette health warning avoidance among smokers
topic Full Length Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4803020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26874916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.01.025
work_keys_str_mv AT stothartgeorge neuralcorrelatesofcigarettehealthwarningavoidanceamongsmokers
AT maynardolivia neuralcorrelatesofcigarettehealthwarningavoidanceamongsmokers
AT lavisrosie neuralcorrelatesofcigarettehealthwarningavoidanceamongsmokers
AT munafomarcus neuralcorrelatesofcigarettehealthwarningavoidanceamongsmokers