Cargando…

Ocriplasmin: who is the best candidate?

Enzymatic vitreolysis is currently the focus of attention around the world for treating vitreomacular traction and full-thickness macular hole. Induction of posterior vitreous detachment is an active area of developmental clinical and basic research. Despite exerting an incompletely elucidated physi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prospero Ponce, Claudia M, Stevenson, William, Gelman, Rachel, Agarwal, Daniel R, Christoforidis, John B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4803238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27051270
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S97947
_version_ 1782422851882582016
author Prospero Ponce, Claudia M
Stevenson, William
Gelman, Rachel
Agarwal, Daniel R
Christoforidis, John B
author_facet Prospero Ponce, Claudia M
Stevenson, William
Gelman, Rachel
Agarwal, Daniel R
Christoforidis, John B
author_sort Prospero Ponce, Claudia M
collection PubMed
description Enzymatic vitreolysis is currently the focus of attention around the world for treating vitreomacular traction and full-thickness macular hole. Induction of posterior vitreous detachment is an active area of developmental clinical and basic research. Despite exerting an incompletely elucidated physiological effect, ocriplasmin (also known as microplasmin) has been recognized to serve as a well-tolerated intravitreal injection for the treatment of vitreomacular traction and full-thickness macular hole. There are several unexplored areas of intervention where enzymatic vitreolysis could potentially be used (ie, diabetic macular edema). Recent promising studies have included combinations of enzymatic approaches and new synthetic molecules that induce complete posterior vitreous detachment as well as antiangiogenesis. Although no guidelines have been proposed for the use of ocriplasmin, this review attempts to aid physicians in answering the most important question, “Who is the best candidate?”
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4803238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48032382016-04-05 Ocriplasmin: who is the best candidate? Prospero Ponce, Claudia M Stevenson, William Gelman, Rachel Agarwal, Daniel R Christoforidis, John B Clin Ophthalmol Review Enzymatic vitreolysis is currently the focus of attention around the world for treating vitreomacular traction and full-thickness macular hole. Induction of posterior vitreous detachment is an active area of developmental clinical and basic research. Despite exerting an incompletely elucidated physiological effect, ocriplasmin (also known as microplasmin) has been recognized to serve as a well-tolerated intravitreal injection for the treatment of vitreomacular traction and full-thickness macular hole. There are several unexplored areas of intervention where enzymatic vitreolysis could potentially be used (ie, diabetic macular edema). Recent promising studies have included combinations of enzymatic approaches and new synthetic molecules that induce complete posterior vitreous detachment as well as antiangiogenesis. Although no guidelines have been proposed for the use of ocriplasmin, this review attempts to aid physicians in answering the most important question, “Who is the best candidate?” Dove Medical Press 2016-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4803238/ /pubmed/27051270 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S97947 Text en © 2016 Prospero Ponce et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Prospero Ponce, Claudia M
Stevenson, William
Gelman, Rachel
Agarwal, Daniel R
Christoforidis, John B
Ocriplasmin: who is the best candidate?
title Ocriplasmin: who is the best candidate?
title_full Ocriplasmin: who is the best candidate?
title_fullStr Ocriplasmin: who is the best candidate?
title_full_unstemmed Ocriplasmin: who is the best candidate?
title_short Ocriplasmin: who is the best candidate?
title_sort ocriplasmin: who is the best candidate?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4803238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27051270
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S97947
work_keys_str_mv AT prosperoponceclaudiam ocriplasminwhoisthebestcandidate
AT stevensonwilliam ocriplasminwhoisthebestcandidate
AT gelmanrachel ocriplasminwhoisthebestcandidate
AT agarwaldanielr ocriplasminwhoisthebestcandidate
AT christoforidisjohnb ocriplasminwhoisthebestcandidate