Cargando…
Ocriplasmin: who is the best candidate?
Enzymatic vitreolysis is currently the focus of attention around the world for treating vitreomacular traction and full-thickness macular hole. Induction of posterior vitreous detachment is an active area of developmental clinical and basic research. Despite exerting an incompletely elucidated physi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4803238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27051270 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S97947 |
_version_ | 1782422851882582016 |
---|---|
author | Prospero Ponce, Claudia M Stevenson, William Gelman, Rachel Agarwal, Daniel R Christoforidis, John B |
author_facet | Prospero Ponce, Claudia M Stevenson, William Gelman, Rachel Agarwal, Daniel R Christoforidis, John B |
author_sort | Prospero Ponce, Claudia M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Enzymatic vitreolysis is currently the focus of attention around the world for treating vitreomacular traction and full-thickness macular hole. Induction of posterior vitreous detachment is an active area of developmental clinical and basic research. Despite exerting an incompletely elucidated physiological effect, ocriplasmin (also known as microplasmin) has been recognized to serve as a well-tolerated intravitreal injection for the treatment of vitreomacular traction and full-thickness macular hole. There are several unexplored areas of intervention where enzymatic vitreolysis could potentially be used (ie, diabetic macular edema). Recent promising studies have included combinations of enzymatic approaches and new synthetic molecules that induce complete posterior vitreous detachment as well as antiangiogenesis. Although no guidelines have been proposed for the use of ocriplasmin, this review attempts to aid physicians in answering the most important question, “Who is the best candidate?” |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4803238 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48032382016-04-05 Ocriplasmin: who is the best candidate? Prospero Ponce, Claudia M Stevenson, William Gelman, Rachel Agarwal, Daniel R Christoforidis, John B Clin Ophthalmol Review Enzymatic vitreolysis is currently the focus of attention around the world for treating vitreomacular traction and full-thickness macular hole. Induction of posterior vitreous detachment is an active area of developmental clinical and basic research. Despite exerting an incompletely elucidated physiological effect, ocriplasmin (also known as microplasmin) has been recognized to serve as a well-tolerated intravitreal injection for the treatment of vitreomacular traction and full-thickness macular hole. There are several unexplored areas of intervention where enzymatic vitreolysis could potentially be used (ie, diabetic macular edema). Recent promising studies have included combinations of enzymatic approaches and new synthetic molecules that induce complete posterior vitreous detachment as well as antiangiogenesis. Although no guidelines have been proposed for the use of ocriplasmin, this review attempts to aid physicians in answering the most important question, “Who is the best candidate?” Dove Medical Press 2016-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4803238/ /pubmed/27051270 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S97947 Text en © 2016 Prospero Ponce et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Review Prospero Ponce, Claudia M Stevenson, William Gelman, Rachel Agarwal, Daniel R Christoforidis, John B Ocriplasmin: who is the best candidate? |
title | Ocriplasmin: who is the best candidate? |
title_full | Ocriplasmin: who is the best candidate? |
title_fullStr | Ocriplasmin: who is the best candidate? |
title_full_unstemmed | Ocriplasmin: who is the best candidate? |
title_short | Ocriplasmin: who is the best candidate? |
title_sort | ocriplasmin: who is the best candidate? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4803238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27051270 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S97947 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prosperoponceclaudiam ocriplasminwhoisthebestcandidate AT stevensonwilliam ocriplasminwhoisthebestcandidate AT gelmanrachel ocriplasminwhoisthebestcandidate AT agarwaldanielr ocriplasminwhoisthebestcandidate AT christoforidisjohnb ocriplasminwhoisthebestcandidate |