Cargando…

Photometric Compliance of Tablet Screens and Retro-Illuminated Acuity Charts As Visual Acuity Measurement Devices

Mobile technology is increasingly used to measure visual acuity. Standards for chart-based acuity tests specify photometric requirements for luminance, optotype contrast and luminance uniformity. Manufacturers provide some photometric data but little is known about tablet performance for visual acui...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Livingstone, I. A. T., Tarbert, C. M., Giardini, M. E., Bastawrous, A., Middleton, D., Hamilton, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4803292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27002333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150676
_version_ 1782422860770312192
author Livingstone, I. A. T.
Tarbert, C. M.
Giardini, M. E.
Bastawrous, A.
Middleton, D.
Hamilton, R.
author_facet Livingstone, I. A. T.
Tarbert, C. M.
Giardini, M. E.
Bastawrous, A.
Middleton, D.
Hamilton, R.
author_sort Livingstone, I. A. T.
collection PubMed
description Mobile technology is increasingly used to measure visual acuity. Standards for chart-based acuity tests specify photometric requirements for luminance, optotype contrast and luminance uniformity. Manufacturers provide some photometric data but little is known about tablet performance for visual acuity testing. This study photometrically characterised seven tablet computers (iPad, Apple inc.) and three ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) visual acuity charts with room lights on and off, and compared findings with visual acuity measurement standards. Tablet screen luminance and contrast were measured using nine points across a black and white checkerboard test screen at five arbitrary brightness levels. ETDRS optotypes and adjacent white background luminance and contrast were measured. All seven tablets (room lights off) exceeded the most stringent requirement for mean luminance (≥ 120 cd/m(2)) providing the nominal brightness setting was above 50%. All exceeded contrast requirement (Weber ≥ 90%) regardless of brightness setting, and five were marginally below the required luminance uniformity threshold (L(min)/L(max) ≥ 80%). Re-assessing three tablets with room lights on made little difference to mean luminance or contrast, and improved luminance uniformity to exceed the threshold. The three EDTRS charts (room lights off) had adequate mean luminance (≥ 120 cd/m(2)) and Weber contrast (≥ 90%), but all three charts failed to meet the luminance uniformity standard (L(min)/L(max) ≥ 80%). Two charts were operating beyond manufacturer’s recommended lamp replacement schedule. With room lights on, chart mean luminance and Weber contrast increased, but two charts still had inadequate luminance uniformity. Tablet computers showed less inter-device variability, higher contrast, and better luminance uniformity than charts in both lights-on and lights-off environments, providing brightness setting was >50%. Overall, iPad tablets matched or marginally out-performed ETDRS charts in terms of photometric compliance with high contrast acuity standards.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4803292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48032922016-03-25 Photometric Compliance of Tablet Screens and Retro-Illuminated Acuity Charts As Visual Acuity Measurement Devices Livingstone, I. A. T. Tarbert, C. M. Giardini, M. E. Bastawrous, A. Middleton, D. Hamilton, R. PLoS One Research Article Mobile technology is increasingly used to measure visual acuity. Standards for chart-based acuity tests specify photometric requirements for luminance, optotype contrast and luminance uniformity. Manufacturers provide some photometric data but little is known about tablet performance for visual acuity testing. This study photometrically characterised seven tablet computers (iPad, Apple inc.) and three ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) visual acuity charts with room lights on and off, and compared findings with visual acuity measurement standards. Tablet screen luminance and contrast were measured using nine points across a black and white checkerboard test screen at five arbitrary brightness levels. ETDRS optotypes and adjacent white background luminance and contrast were measured. All seven tablets (room lights off) exceeded the most stringent requirement for mean luminance (≥ 120 cd/m(2)) providing the nominal brightness setting was above 50%. All exceeded contrast requirement (Weber ≥ 90%) regardless of brightness setting, and five were marginally below the required luminance uniformity threshold (L(min)/L(max) ≥ 80%). Re-assessing three tablets with room lights on made little difference to mean luminance or contrast, and improved luminance uniformity to exceed the threshold. The three EDTRS charts (room lights off) had adequate mean luminance (≥ 120 cd/m(2)) and Weber contrast (≥ 90%), but all three charts failed to meet the luminance uniformity standard (L(min)/L(max) ≥ 80%). Two charts were operating beyond manufacturer’s recommended lamp replacement schedule. With room lights on, chart mean luminance and Weber contrast increased, but two charts still had inadequate luminance uniformity. Tablet computers showed less inter-device variability, higher contrast, and better luminance uniformity than charts in both lights-on and lights-off environments, providing brightness setting was >50%. Overall, iPad tablets matched or marginally out-performed ETDRS charts in terms of photometric compliance with high contrast acuity standards. Public Library of Science 2016-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4803292/ /pubmed/27002333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150676 Text en © 2016 Livingstone et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Livingstone, I. A. T.
Tarbert, C. M.
Giardini, M. E.
Bastawrous, A.
Middleton, D.
Hamilton, R.
Photometric Compliance of Tablet Screens and Retro-Illuminated Acuity Charts As Visual Acuity Measurement Devices
title Photometric Compliance of Tablet Screens and Retro-Illuminated Acuity Charts As Visual Acuity Measurement Devices
title_full Photometric Compliance of Tablet Screens and Retro-Illuminated Acuity Charts As Visual Acuity Measurement Devices
title_fullStr Photometric Compliance of Tablet Screens and Retro-Illuminated Acuity Charts As Visual Acuity Measurement Devices
title_full_unstemmed Photometric Compliance of Tablet Screens and Retro-Illuminated Acuity Charts As Visual Acuity Measurement Devices
title_short Photometric Compliance of Tablet Screens and Retro-Illuminated Acuity Charts As Visual Acuity Measurement Devices
title_sort photometric compliance of tablet screens and retro-illuminated acuity charts as visual acuity measurement devices
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4803292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27002333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150676
work_keys_str_mv AT livingstoneiat photometriccomplianceoftabletscreensandretroilluminatedacuitychartsasvisualacuitymeasurementdevices
AT tarbertcm photometriccomplianceoftabletscreensandretroilluminatedacuitychartsasvisualacuitymeasurementdevices
AT giardinime photometriccomplianceoftabletscreensandretroilluminatedacuitychartsasvisualacuitymeasurementdevices
AT bastawrousa photometriccomplianceoftabletscreensandretroilluminatedacuitychartsasvisualacuitymeasurementdevices
AT middletond photometriccomplianceoftabletscreensandretroilluminatedacuitychartsasvisualacuitymeasurementdevices
AT hamiltonr photometriccomplianceoftabletscreensandretroilluminatedacuitychartsasvisualacuitymeasurementdevices