Cargando…
Photometric Compliance of Tablet Screens and Retro-Illuminated Acuity Charts As Visual Acuity Measurement Devices
Mobile technology is increasingly used to measure visual acuity. Standards for chart-based acuity tests specify photometric requirements for luminance, optotype contrast and luminance uniformity. Manufacturers provide some photometric data but little is known about tablet performance for visual acui...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4803292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27002333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150676 |
_version_ | 1782422860770312192 |
---|---|
author | Livingstone, I. A. T. Tarbert, C. M. Giardini, M. E. Bastawrous, A. Middleton, D. Hamilton, R. |
author_facet | Livingstone, I. A. T. Tarbert, C. M. Giardini, M. E. Bastawrous, A. Middleton, D. Hamilton, R. |
author_sort | Livingstone, I. A. T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mobile technology is increasingly used to measure visual acuity. Standards for chart-based acuity tests specify photometric requirements for luminance, optotype contrast and luminance uniformity. Manufacturers provide some photometric data but little is known about tablet performance for visual acuity testing. This study photometrically characterised seven tablet computers (iPad, Apple inc.) and three ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) visual acuity charts with room lights on and off, and compared findings with visual acuity measurement standards. Tablet screen luminance and contrast were measured using nine points across a black and white checkerboard test screen at five arbitrary brightness levels. ETDRS optotypes and adjacent white background luminance and contrast were measured. All seven tablets (room lights off) exceeded the most stringent requirement for mean luminance (≥ 120 cd/m(2)) providing the nominal brightness setting was above 50%. All exceeded contrast requirement (Weber ≥ 90%) regardless of brightness setting, and five were marginally below the required luminance uniformity threshold (L(min)/L(max) ≥ 80%). Re-assessing three tablets with room lights on made little difference to mean luminance or contrast, and improved luminance uniformity to exceed the threshold. The three EDTRS charts (room lights off) had adequate mean luminance (≥ 120 cd/m(2)) and Weber contrast (≥ 90%), but all three charts failed to meet the luminance uniformity standard (L(min)/L(max) ≥ 80%). Two charts were operating beyond manufacturer’s recommended lamp replacement schedule. With room lights on, chart mean luminance and Weber contrast increased, but two charts still had inadequate luminance uniformity. Tablet computers showed less inter-device variability, higher contrast, and better luminance uniformity than charts in both lights-on and lights-off environments, providing brightness setting was >50%. Overall, iPad tablets matched or marginally out-performed ETDRS charts in terms of photometric compliance with high contrast acuity standards. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4803292 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48032922016-03-25 Photometric Compliance of Tablet Screens and Retro-Illuminated Acuity Charts As Visual Acuity Measurement Devices Livingstone, I. A. T. Tarbert, C. M. Giardini, M. E. Bastawrous, A. Middleton, D. Hamilton, R. PLoS One Research Article Mobile technology is increasingly used to measure visual acuity. Standards for chart-based acuity tests specify photometric requirements for luminance, optotype contrast and luminance uniformity. Manufacturers provide some photometric data but little is known about tablet performance for visual acuity testing. This study photometrically characterised seven tablet computers (iPad, Apple inc.) and three ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) visual acuity charts with room lights on and off, and compared findings with visual acuity measurement standards. Tablet screen luminance and contrast were measured using nine points across a black and white checkerboard test screen at five arbitrary brightness levels. ETDRS optotypes and adjacent white background luminance and contrast were measured. All seven tablets (room lights off) exceeded the most stringent requirement for mean luminance (≥ 120 cd/m(2)) providing the nominal brightness setting was above 50%. All exceeded contrast requirement (Weber ≥ 90%) regardless of brightness setting, and five were marginally below the required luminance uniformity threshold (L(min)/L(max) ≥ 80%). Re-assessing three tablets with room lights on made little difference to mean luminance or contrast, and improved luminance uniformity to exceed the threshold. The three EDTRS charts (room lights off) had adequate mean luminance (≥ 120 cd/m(2)) and Weber contrast (≥ 90%), but all three charts failed to meet the luminance uniformity standard (L(min)/L(max) ≥ 80%). Two charts were operating beyond manufacturer’s recommended lamp replacement schedule. With room lights on, chart mean luminance and Weber contrast increased, but two charts still had inadequate luminance uniformity. Tablet computers showed less inter-device variability, higher contrast, and better luminance uniformity than charts in both lights-on and lights-off environments, providing brightness setting was >50%. Overall, iPad tablets matched or marginally out-performed ETDRS charts in terms of photometric compliance with high contrast acuity standards. Public Library of Science 2016-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4803292/ /pubmed/27002333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150676 Text en © 2016 Livingstone et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Livingstone, I. A. T. Tarbert, C. M. Giardini, M. E. Bastawrous, A. Middleton, D. Hamilton, R. Photometric Compliance of Tablet Screens and Retro-Illuminated Acuity Charts As Visual Acuity Measurement Devices |
title | Photometric Compliance of Tablet Screens and Retro-Illuminated Acuity Charts As Visual Acuity Measurement Devices |
title_full | Photometric Compliance of Tablet Screens and Retro-Illuminated Acuity Charts As Visual Acuity Measurement Devices |
title_fullStr | Photometric Compliance of Tablet Screens and Retro-Illuminated Acuity Charts As Visual Acuity Measurement Devices |
title_full_unstemmed | Photometric Compliance of Tablet Screens and Retro-Illuminated Acuity Charts As Visual Acuity Measurement Devices |
title_short | Photometric Compliance of Tablet Screens and Retro-Illuminated Acuity Charts As Visual Acuity Measurement Devices |
title_sort | photometric compliance of tablet screens and retro-illuminated acuity charts as visual acuity measurement devices |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4803292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27002333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150676 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT livingstoneiat photometriccomplianceoftabletscreensandretroilluminatedacuitychartsasvisualacuitymeasurementdevices AT tarbertcm photometriccomplianceoftabletscreensandretroilluminatedacuitychartsasvisualacuitymeasurementdevices AT giardinime photometriccomplianceoftabletscreensandretroilluminatedacuitychartsasvisualacuitymeasurementdevices AT bastawrousa photometriccomplianceoftabletscreensandretroilluminatedacuitychartsasvisualacuitymeasurementdevices AT middletond photometriccomplianceoftabletscreensandretroilluminatedacuitychartsasvisualacuitymeasurementdevices AT hamiltonr photometriccomplianceoftabletscreensandretroilluminatedacuitychartsasvisualacuitymeasurementdevices |