Cargando…

Phase-Sensitive Inversion-Recovery MRI Improves Longitudinal Cortical Lesion Detection in Progressive MS

Previous studies comparing phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) to double inversion recovery (DIR) have demonstrated that use of PSIR improves cross-sectional in vivo detection of cortical lesions (CL) in multiple sclerosis. We studied the utility of PSIR in detection/characterization of accrua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harel, Asaff, Ceccarelli, Antonia, Farrell, Colleen, Fabian, Michelle, Howard, Jonathan, Riley, Claire, Miller, Aaron, Lublin, Fred, Inglese, Matilde
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4803340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27002529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152180
_version_ 1782422870086909952
author Harel, Asaff
Ceccarelli, Antonia
Farrell, Colleen
Fabian, Michelle
Howard, Jonathan
Riley, Claire
Miller, Aaron
Lublin, Fred
Inglese, Matilde
author_facet Harel, Asaff
Ceccarelli, Antonia
Farrell, Colleen
Fabian, Michelle
Howard, Jonathan
Riley, Claire
Miller, Aaron
Lublin, Fred
Inglese, Matilde
author_sort Harel, Asaff
collection PubMed
description Previous studies comparing phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) to double inversion recovery (DIR) have demonstrated that use of PSIR improves cross-sectional in vivo detection of cortical lesions (CL) in multiple sclerosis. We studied the utility of PSIR in detection/characterization of accrual of CL over time in a 1-year longitudinal study in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) compared to DIR. PSIR and DIR images were acquired with 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 25 patients with PPMS and 19 healthy controls at baseline, and after 1 year in 20 patients with PPMS. CL were classified as intracortical, leucocortical or juxtacortical. Lesion counts and volumes were calculated for both time points from both sequences and compared. Correlations with measures of physical and cognitive disability were determined as well as new CL counts and volumes. Compared to DIR, PSIR led to detection of a higher number of CL involving a larger proportion of patients with PPMS both cross-sectionally (p = 0.006, 88%) and longitudinally (p = 0.007, 95%), and led to the reclassification of a third of CL seen on DIR at each time point. Interestingly, PSIR was more sensitive to new CL accumulation over time compared to DIR. PSIR is a promising technique to monitor cortical damage and disease progression in patients with PPMS over a short-term follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4803340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48033402016-03-25 Phase-Sensitive Inversion-Recovery MRI Improves Longitudinal Cortical Lesion Detection in Progressive MS Harel, Asaff Ceccarelli, Antonia Farrell, Colleen Fabian, Michelle Howard, Jonathan Riley, Claire Miller, Aaron Lublin, Fred Inglese, Matilde PLoS One Research Article Previous studies comparing phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) to double inversion recovery (DIR) have demonstrated that use of PSIR improves cross-sectional in vivo detection of cortical lesions (CL) in multiple sclerosis. We studied the utility of PSIR in detection/characterization of accrual of CL over time in a 1-year longitudinal study in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) compared to DIR. PSIR and DIR images were acquired with 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 25 patients with PPMS and 19 healthy controls at baseline, and after 1 year in 20 patients with PPMS. CL were classified as intracortical, leucocortical or juxtacortical. Lesion counts and volumes were calculated for both time points from both sequences and compared. Correlations with measures of physical and cognitive disability were determined as well as new CL counts and volumes. Compared to DIR, PSIR led to detection of a higher number of CL involving a larger proportion of patients with PPMS both cross-sectionally (p = 0.006, 88%) and longitudinally (p = 0.007, 95%), and led to the reclassification of a third of CL seen on DIR at each time point. Interestingly, PSIR was more sensitive to new CL accumulation over time compared to DIR. PSIR is a promising technique to monitor cortical damage and disease progression in patients with PPMS over a short-term follow-up. Public Library of Science 2016-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4803340/ /pubmed/27002529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152180 Text en © 2016 Harel et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Harel, Asaff
Ceccarelli, Antonia
Farrell, Colleen
Fabian, Michelle
Howard, Jonathan
Riley, Claire
Miller, Aaron
Lublin, Fred
Inglese, Matilde
Phase-Sensitive Inversion-Recovery MRI Improves Longitudinal Cortical Lesion Detection in Progressive MS
title Phase-Sensitive Inversion-Recovery MRI Improves Longitudinal Cortical Lesion Detection in Progressive MS
title_full Phase-Sensitive Inversion-Recovery MRI Improves Longitudinal Cortical Lesion Detection in Progressive MS
title_fullStr Phase-Sensitive Inversion-Recovery MRI Improves Longitudinal Cortical Lesion Detection in Progressive MS
title_full_unstemmed Phase-Sensitive Inversion-Recovery MRI Improves Longitudinal Cortical Lesion Detection in Progressive MS
title_short Phase-Sensitive Inversion-Recovery MRI Improves Longitudinal Cortical Lesion Detection in Progressive MS
title_sort phase-sensitive inversion-recovery mri improves longitudinal cortical lesion detection in progressive ms
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4803340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27002529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152180
work_keys_str_mv AT harelasaff phasesensitiveinversionrecoverymriimproveslongitudinalcorticallesiondetectioninprogressivems
AT ceccarelliantonia phasesensitiveinversionrecoverymriimproveslongitudinalcorticallesiondetectioninprogressivems
AT farrellcolleen phasesensitiveinversionrecoverymriimproveslongitudinalcorticallesiondetectioninprogressivems
AT fabianmichelle phasesensitiveinversionrecoverymriimproveslongitudinalcorticallesiondetectioninprogressivems
AT howardjonathan phasesensitiveinversionrecoverymriimproveslongitudinalcorticallesiondetectioninprogressivems
AT rileyclaire phasesensitiveinversionrecoverymriimproveslongitudinalcorticallesiondetectioninprogressivems
AT milleraaron phasesensitiveinversionrecoverymriimproveslongitudinalcorticallesiondetectioninprogressivems
AT lublinfred phasesensitiveinversionrecoverymriimproveslongitudinalcorticallesiondetectioninprogressivems
AT inglesematilde phasesensitiveinversionrecoverymriimproveslongitudinalcorticallesiondetectioninprogressivems