Cargando…
Structure and Relationships of University Instructors’ Achievement Goals
The present study examines the achievement goals of university instructors, particularly the structure of such goals, and their relationship to biographic characteristics, other aspects of instructors’ motivation, and teaching quality. Two hundred and fifty-one university instructors (184 without Ph...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4803730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27047411 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00375 |
_version_ | 1782422894299578368 |
---|---|
author | Daumiller, Martin Grassinger, Robert Dickhäuser, Oliver Dresel, Markus |
author_facet | Daumiller, Martin Grassinger, Robert Dickhäuser, Oliver Dresel, Markus |
author_sort | Daumiller, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present study examines the achievement goals of university instructors, particularly the structure of such goals, and their relationship to biographic characteristics, other aspects of instructors’ motivation, and teaching quality. Two hundred and fifty-one university instructors (184 without Ph.D., 97 with Ph.D., thereof 51 full professors; 146 males, 92 females) answered a questionnaire measuring achievement goals, self-efficacy, and enthusiasm in altogether 392 courses. Teaching quality was assessed using reports from 9,241 students who were attending these courses. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed mastery, performance approach, performance avoidance, work avoidance, and relational goals as being distinguishable from each other. Distinct relationships were found between different instructors’ achievement goals, and gender, age, and career status as well as self-efficacy and enthusiasm. Hierarchical linear models suggested positive associations of instructors’ mastery goals with teaching quality, while negative associations were indicated for performance avoidance goals and work avoidance goals in relation to teaching quality. Exploratory analyses conducted due to a quite large correlation between performance approach and performance avoidance goals indicated that for university instructors, differentiating performance goals into appearance and normative components might also be adequate. All in all, the study highlights the auspiciousness of the theoretical concept of university instructors’ achievement goals and contributes to making it comprehensively accessible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4803730 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48037302016-04-04 Structure and Relationships of University Instructors’ Achievement Goals Daumiller, Martin Grassinger, Robert Dickhäuser, Oliver Dresel, Markus Front Psychol Psychology The present study examines the achievement goals of university instructors, particularly the structure of such goals, and their relationship to biographic characteristics, other aspects of instructors’ motivation, and teaching quality. Two hundred and fifty-one university instructors (184 without Ph.D., 97 with Ph.D., thereof 51 full professors; 146 males, 92 females) answered a questionnaire measuring achievement goals, self-efficacy, and enthusiasm in altogether 392 courses. Teaching quality was assessed using reports from 9,241 students who were attending these courses. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed mastery, performance approach, performance avoidance, work avoidance, and relational goals as being distinguishable from each other. Distinct relationships were found between different instructors’ achievement goals, and gender, age, and career status as well as self-efficacy and enthusiasm. Hierarchical linear models suggested positive associations of instructors’ mastery goals with teaching quality, while negative associations were indicated for performance avoidance goals and work avoidance goals in relation to teaching quality. Exploratory analyses conducted due to a quite large correlation between performance approach and performance avoidance goals indicated that for university instructors, differentiating performance goals into appearance and normative components might also be adequate. All in all, the study highlights the auspiciousness of the theoretical concept of university instructors’ achievement goals and contributes to making it comprehensively accessible. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4803730/ /pubmed/27047411 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00375 Text en Copyright © 2016 Daumiller, Grassinger, Dickhäuser and Dresel. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Daumiller, Martin Grassinger, Robert Dickhäuser, Oliver Dresel, Markus Structure and Relationships of University Instructors’ Achievement Goals |
title | Structure and Relationships of University Instructors’ Achievement Goals |
title_full | Structure and Relationships of University Instructors’ Achievement Goals |
title_fullStr | Structure and Relationships of University Instructors’ Achievement Goals |
title_full_unstemmed | Structure and Relationships of University Instructors’ Achievement Goals |
title_short | Structure and Relationships of University Instructors’ Achievement Goals |
title_sort | structure and relationships of university instructors’ achievement goals |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4803730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27047411 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00375 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daumillermartin structureandrelationshipsofuniversityinstructorsachievementgoals AT grassingerrobert structureandrelationshipsofuniversityinstructorsachievementgoals AT dickhauseroliver structureandrelationshipsofuniversityinstructorsachievementgoals AT dreselmarkus structureandrelationshipsofuniversityinstructorsachievementgoals |