Cargando…

Structure and Relationships of University Instructors’ Achievement Goals

The present study examines the achievement goals of university instructors, particularly the structure of such goals, and their relationship to biographic characteristics, other aspects of instructors’ motivation, and teaching quality. Two hundred and fifty-one university instructors (184 without Ph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daumiller, Martin, Grassinger, Robert, Dickhäuser, Oliver, Dresel, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4803730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27047411
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00375
_version_ 1782422894299578368
author Daumiller, Martin
Grassinger, Robert
Dickhäuser, Oliver
Dresel, Markus
author_facet Daumiller, Martin
Grassinger, Robert
Dickhäuser, Oliver
Dresel, Markus
author_sort Daumiller, Martin
collection PubMed
description The present study examines the achievement goals of university instructors, particularly the structure of such goals, and their relationship to biographic characteristics, other aspects of instructors’ motivation, and teaching quality. Two hundred and fifty-one university instructors (184 without Ph.D., 97 with Ph.D., thereof 51 full professors; 146 males, 92 females) answered a questionnaire measuring achievement goals, self-efficacy, and enthusiasm in altogether 392 courses. Teaching quality was assessed using reports from 9,241 students who were attending these courses. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed mastery, performance approach, performance avoidance, work avoidance, and relational goals as being distinguishable from each other. Distinct relationships were found between different instructors’ achievement goals, and gender, age, and career status as well as self-efficacy and enthusiasm. Hierarchical linear models suggested positive associations of instructors’ mastery goals with teaching quality, while negative associations were indicated for performance avoidance goals and work avoidance goals in relation to teaching quality. Exploratory analyses conducted due to a quite large correlation between performance approach and performance avoidance goals indicated that for university instructors, differentiating performance goals into appearance and normative components might also be adequate. All in all, the study highlights the auspiciousness of the theoretical concept of university instructors’ achievement goals and contributes to making it comprehensively accessible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4803730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48037302016-04-04 Structure and Relationships of University Instructors’ Achievement Goals Daumiller, Martin Grassinger, Robert Dickhäuser, Oliver Dresel, Markus Front Psychol Psychology The present study examines the achievement goals of university instructors, particularly the structure of such goals, and their relationship to biographic characteristics, other aspects of instructors’ motivation, and teaching quality. Two hundred and fifty-one university instructors (184 without Ph.D., 97 with Ph.D., thereof 51 full professors; 146 males, 92 females) answered a questionnaire measuring achievement goals, self-efficacy, and enthusiasm in altogether 392 courses. Teaching quality was assessed using reports from 9,241 students who were attending these courses. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed mastery, performance approach, performance avoidance, work avoidance, and relational goals as being distinguishable from each other. Distinct relationships were found between different instructors’ achievement goals, and gender, age, and career status as well as self-efficacy and enthusiasm. Hierarchical linear models suggested positive associations of instructors’ mastery goals with teaching quality, while negative associations were indicated for performance avoidance goals and work avoidance goals in relation to teaching quality. Exploratory analyses conducted due to a quite large correlation between performance approach and performance avoidance goals indicated that for university instructors, differentiating performance goals into appearance and normative components might also be adequate. All in all, the study highlights the auspiciousness of the theoretical concept of university instructors’ achievement goals and contributes to making it comprehensively accessible. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4803730/ /pubmed/27047411 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00375 Text en Copyright © 2016 Daumiller, Grassinger, Dickhäuser and Dresel. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Daumiller, Martin
Grassinger, Robert
Dickhäuser, Oliver
Dresel, Markus
Structure and Relationships of University Instructors’ Achievement Goals
title Structure and Relationships of University Instructors’ Achievement Goals
title_full Structure and Relationships of University Instructors’ Achievement Goals
title_fullStr Structure and Relationships of University Instructors’ Achievement Goals
title_full_unstemmed Structure and Relationships of University Instructors’ Achievement Goals
title_short Structure and Relationships of University Instructors’ Achievement Goals
title_sort structure and relationships of university instructors’ achievement goals
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4803730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27047411
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00375
work_keys_str_mv AT daumillermartin structureandrelationshipsofuniversityinstructorsachievementgoals
AT grassingerrobert structureandrelationshipsofuniversityinstructorsachievementgoals
AT dickhauseroliver structureandrelationshipsofuniversityinstructorsachievementgoals
AT dreselmarkus structureandrelationshipsofuniversityinstructorsachievementgoals