Cargando…

Clinical Interdisciplinary Collaboration Models and Frameworks From Similarities to Differences: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION: So far, various models of interdisciplinary collaboration in clinical nursing have been presented, however, yet a comprehensive model is not available. The purpose of this study is to review the evidences that had presented model or framework with qualitative approach about interdiscip...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahdizadeh, Mousa, Heydari, Abbas, Moonaghi, Hossien Karimi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Canadian Center of Science and Education 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4803863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26153158
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v7n6p170
_version_ 1782422921150464000
author Mahdizadeh, Mousa
Heydari, Abbas
Moonaghi, Hossien Karimi
author_facet Mahdizadeh, Mousa
Heydari, Abbas
Moonaghi, Hossien Karimi
author_sort Mahdizadeh, Mousa
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: So far, various models of interdisciplinary collaboration in clinical nursing have been presented, however, yet a comprehensive model is not available. The purpose of this study is to review the evidences that had presented model or framework with qualitative approach about interdisciplinary collaboration in clinical nursing. METHODS: All the articles and theses published from 1990 to 10 June 2014 which in both English and Persian models or frameworks of clinicians had presented model or framework of clinical collaboration were searched using databases of Proquest, Scopus, pub Med, Science Direct, and Iranian databases of Sid, Magiran, and Iranmedex. In this review, for published articles and theses, keywords according with MESH such as nurse-physician relations, care team, collaboration, interdisciplinary relations and their Persian equivalents were used. RESULTS: In this study contexts, processes and outcomes of interdisciplinary collaboration as findings were extracted. One of the major components affecting on collaboration that most of the models had emphasized was background of collaboration. Most of studies suggested that the outcome of collaboration were improved care, doctors and nurses’ satisfaction, controlling costs, reducing clinical errors and patient’s safety. CONCLUSION: Models and frameworks had different structures, backgrounds, and conditions, but the outcomes were similar. Organizational structure, culture and social factors are important aspects of clinical collaboration. So it is necessary to improve the quality and effectiveness of clinical collaboration these factors to be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4803863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Canadian Center of Science and Education
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48038632016-04-21 Clinical Interdisciplinary Collaboration Models and Frameworks From Similarities to Differences: A Systematic Review Mahdizadeh, Mousa Heydari, Abbas Moonaghi, Hossien Karimi Glob J Health Sci Articles INTRODUCTION: So far, various models of interdisciplinary collaboration in clinical nursing have been presented, however, yet a comprehensive model is not available. The purpose of this study is to review the evidences that had presented model or framework with qualitative approach about interdisciplinary collaboration in clinical nursing. METHODS: All the articles and theses published from 1990 to 10 June 2014 which in both English and Persian models or frameworks of clinicians had presented model or framework of clinical collaboration were searched using databases of Proquest, Scopus, pub Med, Science Direct, and Iranian databases of Sid, Magiran, and Iranmedex. In this review, for published articles and theses, keywords according with MESH such as nurse-physician relations, care team, collaboration, interdisciplinary relations and their Persian equivalents were used. RESULTS: In this study contexts, processes and outcomes of interdisciplinary collaboration as findings were extracted. One of the major components affecting on collaboration that most of the models had emphasized was background of collaboration. Most of studies suggested that the outcome of collaboration were improved care, doctors and nurses’ satisfaction, controlling costs, reducing clinical errors and patient’s safety. CONCLUSION: Models and frameworks had different structures, backgrounds, and conditions, but the outcomes were similar. Organizational structure, culture and social factors are important aspects of clinical collaboration. So it is necessary to improve the quality and effectiveness of clinical collaboration these factors to be considered. Canadian Center of Science and Education 2015-11 2015-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4803863/ /pubmed/26153158 http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v7n6p170 Text en Copyright: © Canadian Center of Science and Education http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Mahdizadeh, Mousa
Heydari, Abbas
Moonaghi, Hossien Karimi
Clinical Interdisciplinary Collaboration Models and Frameworks From Similarities to Differences: A Systematic Review
title Clinical Interdisciplinary Collaboration Models and Frameworks From Similarities to Differences: A Systematic Review
title_full Clinical Interdisciplinary Collaboration Models and Frameworks From Similarities to Differences: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Clinical Interdisciplinary Collaboration Models and Frameworks From Similarities to Differences: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Interdisciplinary Collaboration Models and Frameworks From Similarities to Differences: A Systematic Review
title_short Clinical Interdisciplinary Collaboration Models and Frameworks From Similarities to Differences: A Systematic Review
title_sort clinical interdisciplinary collaboration models and frameworks from similarities to differences: a systematic review
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4803863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26153158
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v7n6p170
work_keys_str_mv AT mahdizadehmousa clinicalinterdisciplinarycollaborationmodelsandframeworksfromsimilaritiestodifferencesasystematicreview
AT heydariabbas clinicalinterdisciplinarycollaborationmodelsandframeworksfromsimilaritiestodifferencesasystematicreview
AT moonaghihossienkarimi clinicalinterdisciplinarycollaborationmodelsandframeworksfromsimilaritiestodifferencesasystematicreview