Cargando…
Paramedic Recognition of Sepsis in the Prehospital Setting: A Prospective Observational Study
Background. Patients with sepsis benefit from early diagnosis and treatment. Accurate paramedic recognition of sepsis is important to initiate care promptly for patients who arrive by Emergency Medical Services. Methods. Prospective observational study of adult patients (age ≥ 16 years) transported...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4804076/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27051533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6717261 |
_version_ | 1782422965531443200 |
---|---|
author | Green, Robert S. Travers, Andrew H. Cain, Edward Campbell, Samuel G. Jensen, Jan L. Petrie, David A. Erdogan, Mete Patrick, Gredi Patrick, Ward |
author_facet | Green, Robert S. Travers, Andrew H. Cain, Edward Campbell, Samuel G. Jensen, Jan L. Petrie, David A. Erdogan, Mete Patrick, Gredi Patrick, Ward |
author_sort | Green, Robert S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Patients with sepsis benefit from early diagnosis and treatment. Accurate paramedic recognition of sepsis is important to initiate care promptly for patients who arrive by Emergency Medical Services. Methods. Prospective observational study of adult patients (age ≥ 16 years) transported by paramedics to the emergency department (ED) of a Canadian tertiary hospital. Paramedic identification of sepsis was assessed using a novel prehospital sepsis screening tool developed by the study team and compared to blind, independent documentation of ED diagnoses by attending emergency physicians (EPs). Specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive value, and likelihood ratios were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Results. Overall, 629 patients were included in the analysis. Sepsis was identified by paramedics in 170 (27.0%) patients and by EPs in 71 (11.3%) patients. Sensitivity of paramedic sepsis identification compared to EP diagnosis was 73.2% (95% CI 61.4–83.0), while specificity was 78.8% (95% CI 75.2–82.2). The accuracy of paramedic identification of sepsis was 78.2% (492/629, 52 true positive, 440 true negative). Positive and negative predictive values were 30.6% (95% CI 23.8–38.1) and 95.9% (95% CI 93.6–97.5), respectively. Conclusion. Using a novel prehospital sepsis screening tool, paramedic recognition of sepsis had greater specificity than sensitivity with reasonable accuracy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4804076 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48040762016-04-05 Paramedic Recognition of Sepsis in the Prehospital Setting: A Prospective Observational Study Green, Robert S. Travers, Andrew H. Cain, Edward Campbell, Samuel G. Jensen, Jan L. Petrie, David A. Erdogan, Mete Patrick, Gredi Patrick, Ward Emerg Med Int Research Article Background. Patients with sepsis benefit from early diagnosis and treatment. Accurate paramedic recognition of sepsis is important to initiate care promptly for patients who arrive by Emergency Medical Services. Methods. Prospective observational study of adult patients (age ≥ 16 years) transported by paramedics to the emergency department (ED) of a Canadian tertiary hospital. Paramedic identification of sepsis was assessed using a novel prehospital sepsis screening tool developed by the study team and compared to blind, independent documentation of ED diagnoses by attending emergency physicians (EPs). Specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive value, and likelihood ratios were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Results. Overall, 629 patients were included in the analysis. Sepsis was identified by paramedics in 170 (27.0%) patients and by EPs in 71 (11.3%) patients. Sensitivity of paramedic sepsis identification compared to EP diagnosis was 73.2% (95% CI 61.4–83.0), while specificity was 78.8% (95% CI 75.2–82.2). The accuracy of paramedic identification of sepsis was 78.2% (492/629, 52 true positive, 440 true negative). Positive and negative predictive values were 30.6% (95% CI 23.8–38.1) and 95.9% (95% CI 93.6–97.5), respectively. Conclusion. Using a novel prehospital sepsis screening tool, paramedic recognition of sepsis had greater specificity than sensitivity with reasonable accuracy. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4804076/ /pubmed/27051533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6717261 Text en Copyright © 2016 Robert S. Green et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Green, Robert S. Travers, Andrew H. Cain, Edward Campbell, Samuel G. Jensen, Jan L. Petrie, David A. Erdogan, Mete Patrick, Gredi Patrick, Ward Paramedic Recognition of Sepsis in the Prehospital Setting: A Prospective Observational Study |
title | Paramedic Recognition of Sepsis in the Prehospital Setting: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_full | Paramedic Recognition of Sepsis in the Prehospital Setting: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_fullStr | Paramedic Recognition of Sepsis in the Prehospital Setting: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Paramedic Recognition of Sepsis in the Prehospital Setting: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_short | Paramedic Recognition of Sepsis in the Prehospital Setting: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_sort | paramedic recognition of sepsis in the prehospital setting: a prospective observational study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4804076/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27051533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6717261 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT greenroberts paramedicrecognitionofsepsisintheprehospitalsettingaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT traversandrewh paramedicrecognitionofsepsisintheprehospitalsettingaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT cainedward paramedicrecognitionofsepsisintheprehospitalsettingaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT campbellsamuelg paramedicrecognitionofsepsisintheprehospitalsettingaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT jensenjanl paramedicrecognitionofsepsisintheprehospitalsettingaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT petriedavida paramedicrecognitionofsepsisintheprehospitalsettingaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT erdoganmete paramedicrecognitionofsepsisintheprehospitalsettingaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT patrickgredi paramedicrecognitionofsepsisintheprehospitalsettingaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT patrickward paramedicrecognitionofsepsisintheprehospitalsettingaprospectiveobservationalstudy |