Cargando…

Paramedic Recognition of Sepsis in the Prehospital Setting: A Prospective Observational Study

Background. Patients with sepsis benefit from early diagnosis and treatment. Accurate paramedic recognition of sepsis is important to initiate care promptly for patients who arrive by Emergency Medical Services. Methods. Prospective observational study of adult patients (age ≥ 16 years) transported...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Green, Robert S., Travers, Andrew H., Cain, Edward, Campbell, Samuel G., Jensen, Jan L., Petrie, David A., Erdogan, Mete, Patrick, Gredi, Patrick, Ward
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4804076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27051533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6717261
_version_ 1782422965531443200
author Green, Robert S.
Travers, Andrew H.
Cain, Edward
Campbell, Samuel G.
Jensen, Jan L.
Petrie, David A.
Erdogan, Mete
Patrick, Gredi
Patrick, Ward
author_facet Green, Robert S.
Travers, Andrew H.
Cain, Edward
Campbell, Samuel G.
Jensen, Jan L.
Petrie, David A.
Erdogan, Mete
Patrick, Gredi
Patrick, Ward
author_sort Green, Robert S.
collection PubMed
description Background. Patients with sepsis benefit from early diagnosis and treatment. Accurate paramedic recognition of sepsis is important to initiate care promptly for patients who arrive by Emergency Medical Services. Methods. Prospective observational study of adult patients (age ≥ 16 years) transported by paramedics to the emergency department (ED) of a Canadian tertiary hospital. Paramedic identification of sepsis was assessed using a novel prehospital sepsis screening tool developed by the study team and compared to blind, independent documentation of ED diagnoses by attending emergency physicians (EPs). Specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive value, and likelihood ratios were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Results. Overall, 629 patients were included in the analysis. Sepsis was identified by paramedics in 170 (27.0%) patients and by EPs in 71 (11.3%) patients. Sensitivity of paramedic sepsis identification compared to EP diagnosis was 73.2% (95% CI 61.4–83.0), while specificity was 78.8% (95% CI 75.2–82.2). The accuracy of paramedic identification of sepsis was 78.2% (492/629, 52 true positive, 440 true negative). Positive and negative predictive values were 30.6% (95% CI 23.8–38.1) and 95.9% (95% CI 93.6–97.5), respectively. Conclusion. Using a novel prehospital sepsis screening tool, paramedic recognition of sepsis had greater specificity than sensitivity with reasonable accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4804076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48040762016-04-05 Paramedic Recognition of Sepsis in the Prehospital Setting: A Prospective Observational Study Green, Robert S. Travers, Andrew H. Cain, Edward Campbell, Samuel G. Jensen, Jan L. Petrie, David A. Erdogan, Mete Patrick, Gredi Patrick, Ward Emerg Med Int Research Article Background. Patients with sepsis benefit from early diagnosis and treatment. Accurate paramedic recognition of sepsis is important to initiate care promptly for patients who arrive by Emergency Medical Services. Methods. Prospective observational study of adult patients (age ≥ 16 years) transported by paramedics to the emergency department (ED) of a Canadian tertiary hospital. Paramedic identification of sepsis was assessed using a novel prehospital sepsis screening tool developed by the study team and compared to blind, independent documentation of ED diagnoses by attending emergency physicians (EPs). Specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive value, and likelihood ratios were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Results. Overall, 629 patients were included in the analysis. Sepsis was identified by paramedics in 170 (27.0%) patients and by EPs in 71 (11.3%) patients. Sensitivity of paramedic sepsis identification compared to EP diagnosis was 73.2% (95% CI 61.4–83.0), while specificity was 78.8% (95% CI 75.2–82.2). The accuracy of paramedic identification of sepsis was 78.2% (492/629, 52 true positive, 440 true negative). Positive and negative predictive values were 30.6% (95% CI 23.8–38.1) and 95.9% (95% CI 93.6–97.5), respectively. Conclusion. Using a novel prehospital sepsis screening tool, paramedic recognition of sepsis had greater specificity than sensitivity with reasonable accuracy. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4804076/ /pubmed/27051533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6717261 Text en Copyright © 2016 Robert S. Green et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Green, Robert S.
Travers, Andrew H.
Cain, Edward
Campbell, Samuel G.
Jensen, Jan L.
Petrie, David A.
Erdogan, Mete
Patrick, Gredi
Patrick, Ward
Paramedic Recognition of Sepsis in the Prehospital Setting: A Prospective Observational Study
title Paramedic Recognition of Sepsis in the Prehospital Setting: A Prospective Observational Study
title_full Paramedic Recognition of Sepsis in the Prehospital Setting: A Prospective Observational Study
title_fullStr Paramedic Recognition of Sepsis in the Prehospital Setting: A Prospective Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Paramedic Recognition of Sepsis in the Prehospital Setting: A Prospective Observational Study
title_short Paramedic Recognition of Sepsis in the Prehospital Setting: A Prospective Observational Study
title_sort paramedic recognition of sepsis in the prehospital setting: a prospective observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4804076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27051533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6717261
work_keys_str_mv AT greenroberts paramedicrecognitionofsepsisintheprehospitalsettingaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT traversandrewh paramedicrecognitionofsepsisintheprehospitalsettingaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT cainedward paramedicrecognitionofsepsisintheprehospitalsettingaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT campbellsamuelg paramedicrecognitionofsepsisintheprehospitalsettingaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT jensenjanl paramedicrecognitionofsepsisintheprehospitalsettingaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT petriedavida paramedicrecognitionofsepsisintheprehospitalsettingaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT erdoganmete paramedicrecognitionofsepsisintheprehospitalsettingaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT patrickgredi paramedicrecognitionofsepsisintheprehospitalsettingaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT patrickward paramedicrecognitionofsepsisintheprehospitalsettingaprospectiveobservationalstudy