Cargando…

Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Causes of International Differences in Cognitive Ability Tests

Following Snyderman and Rothman (1987, 1988), we surveyed expert opinions on the current state of intelligence research. This report examines expert opinions on causes of international differences in student assessment and psychometric IQ test results. Experts were surveyed about the importance of c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rindermann, Heiner, Becker, David, Coyle, Thomas R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4804158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27047425
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00399
_version_ 1782422975855722496
author Rindermann, Heiner
Becker, David
Coyle, Thomas R.
author_facet Rindermann, Heiner
Becker, David
Coyle, Thomas R.
author_sort Rindermann, Heiner
collection PubMed
description Following Snyderman and Rothman (1987, 1988), we surveyed expert opinions on the current state of intelligence research. This report examines expert opinions on causes of international differences in student assessment and psychometric IQ test results. Experts were surveyed about the importance of culture, genes, education (quantity and quality), wealth, health, geography, climate, politics, modernization, sampling error, test knowledge, discrimination, test bias, and migration. The importance of these factors was evaluated for diverse countries, regions, and groups including Finland, East Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, Southern Europe, the Arabian-Muslim world, Latin America, Israel, Jews in the West, Roma (gypsies), and Muslim immigrants. Education was rated by N = 71 experts as the most important cause of international ability differences. Genes were rated as the second most relevant factor but also had the highest variability in ratings. Culture, health, wealth, modernization, and politics were the next most important factors, whereas other factors such as geography, climate, test bias, and sampling error were less important. The paper concludes with a discussion of limitations of the survey (e.g., response rates and validity of expert opinions).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4804158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48041582016-04-04 Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Causes of International Differences in Cognitive Ability Tests Rindermann, Heiner Becker, David Coyle, Thomas R. Front Psychol Psychology Following Snyderman and Rothman (1987, 1988), we surveyed expert opinions on the current state of intelligence research. This report examines expert opinions on causes of international differences in student assessment and psychometric IQ test results. Experts were surveyed about the importance of culture, genes, education (quantity and quality), wealth, health, geography, climate, politics, modernization, sampling error, test knowledge, discrimination, test bias, and migration. The importance of these factors was evaluated for diverse countries, regions, and groups including Finland, East Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, Southern Europe, the Arabian-Muslim world, Latin America, Israel, Jews in the West, Roma (gypsies), and Muslim immigrants. Education was rated by N = 71 experts as the most important cause of international ability differences. Genes were rated as the second most relevant factor but also had the highest variability in ratings. Culture, health, wealth, modernization, and politics were the next most important factors, whereas other factors such as geography, climate, test bias, and sampling error were less important. The paper concludes with a discussion of limitations of the survey (e.g., response rates and validity of expert opinions). Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4804158/ /pubmed/27047425 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00399 Text en Copyright © 2016 Rindermann, Becker and Coyle. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Rindermann, Heiner
Becker, David
Coyle, Thomas R.
Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Causes of International Differences in Cognitive Ability Tests
title Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Causes of International Differences in Cognitive Ability Tests
title_full Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Causes of International Differences in Cognitive Ability Tests
title_fullStr Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Causes of International Differences in Cognitive Ability Tests
title_full_unstemmed Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Causes of International Differences in Cognitive Ability Tests
title_short Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Causes of International Differences in Cognitive Ability Tests
title_sort survey of expert opinion on intelligence: causes of international differences in cognitive ability tests
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4804158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27047425
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00399
work_keys_str_mv AT rindermannheiner surveyofexpertopiniononintelligencecausesofinternationaldifferencesincognitiveabilitytests
AT beckerdavid surveyofexpertopiniononintelligencecausesofinternationaldifferencesincognitiveabilitytests
AT coylethomasr surveyofexpertopiniononintelligencecausesofinternationaldifferencesincognitiveabilitytests