Cargando…
Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Causes of International Differences in Cognitive Ability Tests
Following Snyderman and Rothman (1987, 1988), we surveyed expert opinions on the current state of intelligence research. This report examines expert opinions on causes of international differences in student assessment and psychometric IQ test results. Experts were surveyed about the importance of c...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4804158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27047425 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00399 |
_version_ | 1782422975855722496 |
---|---|
author | Rindermann, Heiner Becker, David Coyle, Thomas R. |
author_facet | Rindermann, Heiner Becker, David Coyle, Thomas R. |
author_sort | Rindermann, Heiner |
collection | PubMed |
description | Following Snyderman and Rothman (1987, 1988), we surveyed expert opinions on the current state of intelligence research. This report examines expert opinions on causes of international differences in student assessment and psychometric IQ test results. Experts were surveyed about the importance of culture, genes, education (quantity and quality), wealth, health, geography, climate, politics, modernization, sampling error, test knowledge, discrimination, test bias, and migration. The importance of these factors was evaluated for diverse countries, regions, and groups including Finland, East Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, Southern Europe, the Arabian-Muslim world, Latin America, Israel, Jews in the West, Roma (gypsies), and Muslim immigrants. Education was rated by N = 71 experts as the most important cause of international ability differences. Genes were rated as the second most relevant factor but also had the highest variability in ratings. Culture, health, wealth, modernization, and politics were the next most important factors, whereas other factors such as geography, climate, test bias, and sampling error were less important. The paper concludes with a discussion of limitations of the survey (e.g., response rates and validity of expert opinions). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4804158 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48041582016-04-04 Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Causes of International Differences in Cognitive Ability Tests Rindermann, Heiner Becker, David Coyle, Thomas R. Front Psychol Psychology Following Snyderman and Rothman (1987, 1988), we surveyed expert opinions on the current state of intelligence research. This report examines expert opinions on causes of international differences in student assessment and psychometric IQ test results. Experts were surveyed about the importance of culture, genes, education (quantity and quality), wealth, health, geography, climate, politics, modernization, sampling error, test knowledge, discrimination, test bias, and migration. The importance of these factors was evaluated for diverse countries, regions, and groups including Finland, East Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, Southern Europe, the Arabian-Muslim world, Latin America, Israel, Jews in the West, Roma (gypsies), and Muslim immigrants. Education was rated by N = 71 experts as the most important cause of international ability differences. Genes were rated as the second most relevant factor but also had the highest variability in ratings. Culture, health, wealth, modernization, and politics were the next most important factors, whereas other factors such as geography, climate, test bias, and sampling error were less important. The paper concludes with a discussion of limitations of the survey (e.g., response rates and validity of expert opinions). Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4804158/ /pubmed/27047425 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00399 Text en Copyright © 2016 Rindermann, Becker and Coyle. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Rindermann, Heiner Becker, David Coyle, Thomas R. Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Causes of International Differences in Cognitive Ability Tests |
title | Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Causes of International Differences in Cognitive Ability Tests |
title_full | Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Causes of International Differences in Cognitive Ability Tests |
title_fullStr | Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Causes of International Differences in Cognitive Ability Tests |
title_full_unstemmed | Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Causes of International Differences in Cognitive Ability Tests |
title_short | Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Causes of International Differences in Cognitive Ability Tests |
title_sort | survey of expert opinion on intelligence: causes of international differences in cognitive ability tests |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4804158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27047425 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00399 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rindermannheiner surveyofexpertopiniononintelligencecausesofinternationaldifferencesincognitiveabilitytests AT beckerdavid surveyofexpertopiniononintelligencecausesofinternationaldifferencesincognitiveabilitytests AT coylethomasr surveyofexpertopiniononintelligencecausesofinternationaldifferencesincognitiveabilitytests |