Cargando…
A global assessment of a large monocot family highlights the need for group-specific analyses of invasiveness
Significant progress has been made in understanding biological invasions recently, and one of the key findings is that the determinants of naturalization and invasion success vary from group to group. Here, we explore this variation for one of the largest plant families in the world, the Araceae. Th...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4804228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26873404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plw009 |
_version_ | 1782422988312805376 |
---|---|
author | Moodley, Desika Procheş, Şerban Wilson, John R. U. |
author_facet | Moodley, Desika Procheş, Şerban Wilson, John R. U. |
author_sort | Moodley, Desika |
collection | PubMed |
description | Significant progress has been made in understanding biological invasions recently, and one of the key findings is that the determinants of naturalization and invasion success vary from group to group. Here, we explore this variation for one of the largest plant families in the world, the Araceae. This group provides an excellent opportunity for identifying determinants of invasiveness in herbaceous plants, since it is one of the families most popular with horticulturalists, with species occupying various habitats and comprising many different life forms. We first developed a checklist of 3494 species of Araceae using online databases and literature sources. We aimed to determine whether invasiveness across the introduction–naturalization–invasion continuum is associated to particular traits within the family, and whether analyses focussed on specific life forms can reveal any mechanistic correlates. Boosted regression tree models were based on species invasion statuses as the response variables, and traits associated with human use, biological characteristics and distribution as the explanatory variables. The models indicate that biological traits such as plant life form and pollinator type are consistently strong correlates of invasiveness. Additionally, large-scale correlates such as the number of native floristic regions and number of introduced regions are also influential at particular stages in the invasion continuum. We used these traits to build a phenogram showing groups defined by the similarity of characters. We identified nine groups that have a greater tendency to invasiveness (including Alocasia, the Lemnoideae and Epipremnum). From this, we propose a list of species that are not currently invasive for which we would recommend a precautionary approach to be taken. The successful management of plant invasions will depend on understanding such context-dependent effects across taxonomic groups, and across the different stages of the invasion process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4804228 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48042282016-03-24 A global assessment of a large monocot family highlights the need for group-specific analyses of invasiveness Moodley, Desika Procheş, Şerban Wilson, John R. U. AoB Plants Research Articles Significant progress has been made in understanding biological invasions recently, and one of the key findings is that the determinants of naturalization and invasion success vary from group to group. Here, we explore this variation for one of the largest plant families in the world, the Araceae. This group provides an excellent opportunity for identifying determinants of invasiveness in herbaceous plants, since it is one of the families most popular with horticulturalists, with species occupying various habitats and comprising many different life forms. We first developed a checklist of 3494 species of Araceae using online databases and literature sources. We aimed to determine whether invasiveness across the introduction–naturalization–invasion continuum is associated to particular traits within the family, and whether analyses focussed on specific life forms can reveal any mechanistic correlates. Boosted regression tree models were based on species invasion statuses as the response variables, and traits associated with human use, biological characteristics and distribution as the explanatory variables. The models indicate that biological traits such as plant life form and pollinator type are consistently strong correlates of invasiveness. Additionally, large-scale correlates such as the number of native floristic regions and number of introduced regions are also influential at particular stages in the invasion continuum. We used these traits to build a phenogram showing groups defined by the similarity of characters. We identified nine groups that have a greater tendency to invasiveness (including Alocasia, the Lemnoideae and Epipremnum). From this, we propose a list of species that are not currently invasive for which we would recommend a precautionary approach to be taken. The successful management of plant invasions will depend on understanding such context-dependent effects across taxonomic groups, and across the different stages of the invasion process. Oxford University Press 2016-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4804228/ /pubmed/26873404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plw009 Text en Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Moodley, Desika Procheş, Şerban Wilson, John R. U. A global assessment of a large monocot family highlights the need for group-specific analyses of invasiveness |
title | A global assessment of a large monocot family highlights the need for group-specific analyses of invasiveness |
title_full | A global assessment of a large monocot family highlights the need for group-specific analyses of invasiveness |
title_fullStr | A global assessment of a large monocot family highlights the need for group-specific analyses of invasiveness |
title_full_unstemmed | A global assessment of a large monocot family highlights the need for group-specific analyses of invasiveness |
title_short | A global assessment of a large monocot family highlights the need for group-specific analyses of invasiveness |
title_sort | global assessment of a large monocot family highlights the need for group-specific analyses of invasiveness |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4804228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26873404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plw009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moodleydesika aglobalassessmentofalargemonocotfamilyhighlightstheneedforgroupspecificanalysesofinvasiveness AT prochesserban aglobalassessmentofalargemonocotfamilyhighlightstheneedforgroupspecificanalysesofinvasiveness AT wilsonjohnru aglobalassessmentofalargemonocotfamilyhighlightstheneedforgroupspecificanalysesofinvasiveness AT moodleydesika globalassessmentofalargemonocotfamilyhighlightstheneedforgroupspecificanalysesofinvasiveness AT prochesserban globalassessmentofalargemonocotfamilyhighlightstheneedforgroupspecificanalysesofinvasiveness AT wilsonjohnru globalassessmentofalargemonocotfamilyhighlightstheneedforgroupspecificanalysesofinvasiveness |