Cargando…

The nocebo effect of drugs

While the placebo effect has been studied for a long time, much less is known about its negative counterpart, named the nocebo effect. However, it may be of particular importance because of its impact on the treatment outcomes and public health. We conducted a review on the nocebo effect using PubMe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Planès, Sara, Villier, Céline, Mallaret, Michel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4804316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27069627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.208
_version_ 1782423001779666944
author Planès, Sara
Villier, Céline
Mallaret, Michel
author_facet Planès, Sara
Villier, Céline
Mallaret, Michel
author_sort Planès, Sara
collection PubMed
description While the placebo effect has been studied for a long time, much less is known about its negative counterpart, named the nocebo effect. However, it may be of particular importance because of its impact on the treatment outcomes and public health. We conducted a review on the nocebo effect using PubMed and other databases up to July 2014. The nocebo effect refers by definition to the induction or the worsening of symptoms induced by sham or active therapies. Examples are numerous and concerns both clinical trials and daily practice. The underlying mechanisms are, on one hand, psychological (conditioning and negative expectations) and, on the other hand, neurobiological (role of cholecystokinin, endogenous opioids and dopamine). Nocebo effects can modulate the outcome of a given therapy in a negative way, as do placebo effects in a positive way. The verbal and nonverbal communications of physicians contain numerous unintentional negative suggestions that may trigger a nocebo response. This raises the important issue of how physicians can at the same time obtain informed consent and minimize nocebo‐related risks. Every physician has to deal with this apparent contradiction between primum non nocere and to deliver truthful information about risks. Meticulous identification of patients at risk, information techniques such as positive framing, contextualized informed consent, and even noninformation, is valuable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4804316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48043162016-04-11 The nocebo effect of drugs Planès, Sara Villier, Céline Mallaret, Michel Pharmacol Res Perspect Original Articles While the placebo effect has been studied for a long time, much less is known about its negative counterpart, named the nocebo effect. However, it may be of particular importance because of its impact on the treatment outcomes and public health. We conducted a review on the nocebo effect using PubMed and other databases up to July 2014. The nocebo effect refers by definition to the induction or the worsening of symptoms induced by sham or active therapies. Examples are numerous and concerns both clinical trials and daily practice. The underlying mechanisms are, on one hand, psychological (conditioning and negative expectations) and, on the other hand, neurobiological (role of cholecystokinin, endogenous opioids and dopamine). Nocebo effects can modulate the outcome of a given therapy in a negative way, as do placebo effects in a positive way. The verbal and nonverbal communications of physicians contain numerous unintentional negative suggestions that may trigger a nocebo response. This raises the important issue of how physicians can at the same time obtain informed consent and minimize nocebo‐related risks. Every physician has to deal with this apparent contradiction between primum non nocere and to deliver truthful information about risks. Meticulous identification of patients at risk, information techniques such as positive framing, contextualized informed consent, and even noninformation, is valuable. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4804316/ /pubmed/27069627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.208 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Planès, Sara
Villier, Céline
Mallaret, Michel
The nocebo effect of drugs
title The nocebo effect of drugs
title_full The nocebo effect of drugs
title_fullStr The nocebo effect of drugs
title_full_unstemmed The nocebo effect of drugs
title_short The nocebo effect of drugs
title_sort nocebo effect of drugs
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4804316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27069627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.208
work_keys_str_mv AT planessara thenoceboeffectofdrugs
AT villierceline thenoceboeffectofdrugs
AT mallaretmichel thenoceboeffectofdrugs
AT planessara noceboeffectofdrugs
AT villierceline noceboeffectofdrugs
AT mallaretmichel noceboeffectofdrugs