Cargando…
The nocebo effect of drugs
While the placebo effect has been studied for a long time, much less is known about its negative counterpart, named the nocebo effect. However, it may be of particular importance because of its impact on the treatment outcomes and public health. We conducted a review on the nocebo effect using PubMe...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4804316/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27069627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.208 |
_version_ | 1782423001779666944 |
---|---|
author | Planès, Sara Villier, Céline Mallaret, Michel |
author_facet | Planès, Sara Villier, Céline Mallaret, Michel |
author_sort | Planès, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | While the placebo effect has been studied for a long time, much less is known about its negative counterpart, named the nocebo effect. However, it may be of particular importance because of its impact on the treatment outcomes and public health. We conducted a review on the nocebo effect using PubMed and other databases up to July 2014. The nocebo effect refers by definition to the induction or the worsening of symptoms induced by sham or active therapies. Examples are numerous and concerns both clinical trials and daily practice. The underlying mechanisms are, on one hand, psychological (conditioning and negative expectations) and, on the other hand, neurobiological (role of cholecystokinin, endogenous opioids and dopamine). Nocebo effects can modulate the outcome of a given therapy in a negative way, as do placebo effects in a positive way. The verbal and nonverbal communications of physicians contain numerous unintentional negative suggestions that may trigger a nocebo response. This raises the important issue of how physicians can at the same time obtain informed consent and minimize nocebo‐related risks. Every physician has to deal with this apparent contradiction between primum non nocere and to deliver truthful information about risks. Meticulous identification of patients at risk, information techniques such as positive framing, contextualized informed consent, and even noninformation, is valuable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4804316 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48043162016-04-11 The nocebo effect of drugs Planès, Sara Villier, Céline Mallaret, Michel Pharmacol Res Perspect Original Articles While the placebo effect has been studied for a long time, much less is known about its negative counterpart, named the nocebo effect. However, it may be of particular importance because of its impact on the treatment outcomes and public health. We conducted a review on the nocebo effect using PubMed and other databases up to July 2014. The nocebo effect refers by definition to the induction or the worsening of symptoms induced by sham or active therapies. Examples are numerous and concerns both clinical trials and daily practice. The underlying mechanisms are, on one hand, psychological (conditioning and negative expectations) and, on the other hand, neurobiological (role of cholecystokinin, endogenous opioids and dopamine). Nocebo effects can modulate the outcome of a given therapy in a negative way, as do placebo effects in a positive way. The verbal and nonverbal communications of physicians contain numerous unintentional negative suggestions that may trigger a nocebo response. This raises the important issue of how physicians can at the same time obtain informed consent and minimize nocebo‐related risks. Every physician has to deal with this apparent contradiction between primum non nocere and to deliver truthful information about risks. Meticulous identification of patients at risk, information techniques such as positive framing, contextualized informed consent, and even noninformation, is valuable. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4804316/ /pubmed/27069627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.208 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Planès, Sara Villier, Céline Mallaret, Michel The nocebo effect of drugs |
title | The nocebo effect of drugs |
title_full | The nocebo effect of drugs |
title_fullStr | The nocebo effect of drugs |
title_full_unstemmed | The nocebo effect of drugs |
title_short | The nocebo effect of drugs |
title_sort | nocebo effect of drugs |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4804316/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27069627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.208 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT planessara thenoceboeffectofdrugs AT villierceline thenoceboeffectofdrugs AT mallaretmichel thenoceboeffectofdrugs AT planessara noceboeffectofdrugs AT villierceline noceboeffectofdrugs AT mallaretmichel noceboeffectofdrugs |