Cargando…

Ethical analysis in HTA of complex health interventions

BACKGROUND: In the field of health technology assessment (HTA), there are several approaches that can be used for ethical analysis. However, there is a scarcity of literature that critically evaluates and compares the strength and weaknesses of these approaches when they are applied in practice. In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke, Oortwijn, Wija, van der Wilt, Gert Jan, Refolo, Pietro, Sacchini, Dario, Mozygemba, Kati, Gerhardus, Ansgar, Brereton, Louise, Hofmann, Bjørn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4804607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27004792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0099-z
_version_ 1782423054804058112
author Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke
Oortwijn, Wija
van der Wilt, Gert Jan
Refolo, Pietro
Sacchini, Dario
Mozygemba, Kati
Gerhardus, Ansgar
Brereton, Louise
Hofmann, Bjørn
author_facet Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke
Oortwijn, Wija
van der Wilt, Gert Jan
Refolo, Pietro
Sacchini, Dario
Mozygemba, Kati
Gerhardus, Ansgar
Brereton, Louise
Hofmann, Bjørn
author_sort Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the field of health technology assessment (HTA), there are several approaches that can be used for ethical analysis. However, there is a scarcity of literature that critically evaluates and compares the strength and weaknesses of these approaches when they are applied in practice. In this paper, we analyse the applicability of some selected approaches for addressing ethical issues in HTA in the field of complex health interventions. Complex health interventions have been the focus of methodological attention in HTA. However, the potential methodological challenges for ethical analysis are as yet unknown. METHODS: Six of the most frequently described and applied ethical approaches in HTA were critically assessed against a set of five characteristics of complex health interventions: multiple and changing perspectives, indeterminate phenomena, uncertain causality, unpredictable outcomes, and ethical complexity. The assessments are based on literature and the authors’ experiences of developing, applying and assessing the approaches. RESULTS: The Interactive, participatory HTA approach is by its nature and flexibility, applicable across most complexity characteristics. Wide Reflective Equilibrium is also flexible and its openness to different perspectives makes it better suited for complex health interventions than more rigid conventional approaches, such as Principlism and Casuistry. Approaches developed for HTA purposes are fairly applicable for complex health interventions, which one could expect because they include various ethical perspectives, such as the HTA Core Model® and the Socratic approach. CONCLUSION: This study shows how the applicability for addressing ethical issues in HTA of complex health interventions differs between the selected ethical approaches. Knowledge about these differences may be helpful when choosing and applying an approach for ethical analyses in HTA. We believe that the study contributes to increasing awareness and interest of the ethical aspects of complex health interventions in general.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4804607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48046072016-03-24 Ethical analysis in HTA of complex health interventions Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke Oortwijn, Wija van der Wilt, Gert Jan Refolo, Pietro Sacchini, Dario Mozygemba, Kati Gerhardus, Ansgar Brereton, Louise Hofmann, Bjørn BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: In the field of health technology assessment (HTA), there are several approaches that can be used for ethical analysis. However, there is a scarcity of literature that critically evaluates and compares the strength and weaknesses of these approaches when they are applied in practice. In this paper, we analyse the applicability of some selected approaches for addressing ethical issues in HTA in the field of complex health interventions. Complex health interventions have been the focus of methodological attention in HTA. However, the potential methodological challenges for ethical analysis are as yet unknown. METHODS: Six of the most frequently described and applied ethical approaches in HTA were critically assessed against a set of five characteristics of complex health interventions: multiple and changing perspectives, indeterminate phenomena, uncertain causality, unpredictable outcomes, and ethical complexity. The assessments are based on literature and the authors’ experiences of developing, applying and assessing the approaches. RESULTS: The Interactive, participatory HTA approach is by its nature and flexibility, applicable across most complexity characteristics. Wide Reflective Equilibrium is also flexible and its openness to different perspectives makes it better suited for complex health interventions than more rigid conventional approaches, such as Principlism and Casuistry. Approaches developed for HTA purposes are fairly applicable for complex health interventions, which one could expect because they include various ethical perspectives, such as the HTA Core Model® and the Socratic approach. CONCLUSION: This study shows how the applicability for addressing ethical issues in HTA of complex health interventions differs between the selected ethical approaches. Knowledge about these differences may be helpful when choosing and applying an approach for ethical analyses in HTA. We believe that the study contributes to increasing awareness and interest of the ethical aspects of complex health interventions in general. BioMed Central 2016-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4804607/ /pubmed/27004792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0099-z Text en © Lysdahl et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke
Oortwijn, Wija
van der Wilt, Gert Jan
Refolo, Pietro
Sacchini, Dario
Mozygemba, Kati
Gerhardus, Ansgar
Brereton, Louise
Hofmann, Bjørn
Ethical analysis in HTA of complex health interventions
title Ethical analysis in HTA of complex health interventions
title_full Ethical analysis in HTA of complex health interventions
title_fullStr Ethical analysis in HTA of complex health interventions
title_full_unstemmed Ethical analysis in HTA of complex health interventions
title_short Ethical analysis in HTA of complex health interventions
title_sort ethical analysis in hta of complex health interventions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4804607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27004792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0099-z
work_keys_str_mv AT lysdahlkristinbakke ethicalanalysisinhtaofcomplexhealthinterventions
AT oortwijnwija ethicalanalysisinhtaofcomplexhealthinterventions
AT vanderwiltgertjan ethicalanalysisinhtaofcomplexhealthinterventions
AT refolopietro ethicalanalysisinhtaofcomplexhealthinterventions
AT sacchinidario ethicalanalysisinhtaofcomplexhealthinterventions
AT mozygembakati ethicalanalysisinhtaofcomplexhealthinterventions
AT gerhardusansgar ethicalanalysisinhtaofcomplexhealthinterventions
AT breretonlouise ethicalanalysisinhtaofcomplexhealthinterventions
AT hofmannbjørn ethicalanalysisinhtaofcomplexhealthinterventions