Cargando…
Periodic Peritoneal Dialysis in End Stage Renal Disease: Is it Still Relevant? A Single Center Study from India
BACKGROUND: High cost of maintenance hemodialysis (HD) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (PD) in India has made renal replacement therapy out of reach of many patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). Repeated puncture PD although inferior to HD biochemically, is easily and freely av...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4804647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27057374 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.177979 |
_version_ | 1782423060947664896 |
---|---|
author | Gandhi, K Prasad, D Malhotra, V Agrawal, D Beniwal, P Mathur, M |
author_facet | Gandhi, K Prasad, D Malhotra, V Agrawal, D Beniwal, P Mathur, M |
author_sort | Gandhi, K |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: High cost of maintenance hemodialysis (HD) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (PD) in India has made renal replacement therapy out of reach of many patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). Repeated puncture PD although inferior to HD biochemically, is easily and freely available across Rajasthan, India, and is simple to perform, and does not require sophisticated machines, thus making it an attractive option for dialysis for ESRD. AIM: To analyze the outcomes of periodic PD in patients with ESRD requiring dialysis support. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A prospective study analyzing the data of patients who underwent PD between August 2010 and January 2013 in Sawai Man Singh Hospital, Jaipur, India was conducted. Patients were divided into three groups based on the time period between first and second session of PD. Detailed demographic and clinical data during the study period were collected along with PD related complications. The main outcome studied was technique survival 1 year post initiation of PD. RESULTS: 234 patients received an initial session of PD, of which 174 had a good response and were included in the study. 19 patients received the second PD within 7 days of first (Group 1), 45 patients within 8–14 days (Group 2) and 110 patients within 15–21 days (Group 3). The overall 1 year technique survival was 68.4% (91/133), with a rate of 50% (5/10), 56.8% (21/37), and 75.6% (65/86) for Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3, respectively. The time duration between first and second PD proved to be reliable indicator of the subsequent response, with a technique survival rate significantly lower in Group 1 patients compared to Groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.04). Median dialysis free days were 11, 16 and 21 days in Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3, respectively. Peritonitis rate observed was 2.1% (49/2261) during the study period. CONCLUSION: Periodic PD is a simple, safe and cheap procedure, which can be considered as used as a palliative measure in terminal uremia in underprivileged areas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4804647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48046472016-04-07 Periodic Peritoneal Dialysis in End Stage Renal Disease: Is it Still Relevant? A Single Center Study from India Gandhi, K Prasad, D Malhotra, V Agrawal, D Beniwal, P Mathur, M Ann Med Health Sci Res Original Article BACKGROUND: High cost of maintenance hemodialysis (HD) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (PD) in India has made renal replacement therapy out of reach of many patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). Repeated puncture PD although inferior to HD biochemically, is easily and freely available across Rajasthan, India, and is simple to perform, and does not require sophisticated machines, thus making it an attractive option for dialysis for ESRD. AIM: To analyze the outcomes of periodic PD in patients with ESRD requiring dialysis support. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A prospective study analyzing the data of patients who underwent PD between August 2010 and January 2013 in Sawai Man Singh Hospital, Jaipur, India was conducted. Patients were divided into three groups based on the time period between first and second session of PD. Detailed demographic and clinical data during the study period were collected along with PD related complications. The main outcome studied was technique survival 1 year post initiation of PD. RESULTS: 234 patients received an initial session of PD, of which 174 had a good response and were included in the study. 19 patients received the second PD within 7 days of first (Group 1), 45 patients within 8–14 days (Group 2) and 110 patients within 15–21 days (Group 3). The overall 1 year technique survival was 68.4% (91/133), with a rate of 50% (5/10), 56.8% (21/37), and 75.6% (65/86) for Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3, respectively. The time duration between first and second PD proved to be reliable indicator of the subsequent response, with a technique survival rate significantly lower in Group 1 patients compared to Groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.04). Median dialysis free days were 11, 16 and 21 days in Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3, respectively. Peritonitis rate observed was 2.1% (49/2261) during the study period. CONCLUSION: Periodic PD is a simple, safe and cheap procedure, which can be considered as used as a palliative measure in terminal uremia in underprivileged areas. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4804647/ /pubmed/27057374 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.177979 Text en Copyright: © Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gandhi, K Prasad, D Malhotra, V Agrawal, D Beniwal, P Mathur, M Periodic Peritoneal Dialysis in End Stage Renal Disease: Is it Still Relevant? A Single Center Study from India |
title | Periodic Peritoneal Dialysis in End Stage Renal Disease: Is it Still Relevant? A Single Center Study from India |
title_full | Periodic Peritoneal Dialysis in End Stage Renal Disease: Is it Still Relevant? A Single Center Study from India |
title_fullStr | Periodic Peritoneal Dialysis in End Stage Renal Disease: Is it Still Relevant? A Single Center Study from India |
title_full_unstemmed | Periodic Peritoneal Dialysis in End Stage Renal Disease: Is it Still Relevant? A Single Center Study from India |
title_short | Periodic Peritoneal Dialysis in End Stage Renal Disease: Is it Still Relevant? A Single Center Study from India |
title_sort | periodic peritoneal dialysis in end stage renal disease: is it still relevant? a single center study from india |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4804647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27057374 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.177979 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gandhik periodicperitonealdialysisinendstagerenaldiseaseisitstillrelevantasinglecenterstudyfromindia AT prasadd periodicperitonealdialysisinendstagerenaldiseaseisitstillrelevantasinglecenterstudyfromindia AT malhotrav periodicperitonealdialysisinendstagerenaldiseaseisitstillrelevantasinglecenterstudyfromindia AT agrawald periodicperitonealdialysisinendstagerenaldiseaseisitstillrelevantasinglecenterstudyfromindia AT beniwalp periodicperitonealdialysisinendstagerenaldiseaseisitstillrelevantasinglecenterstudyfromindia AT mathurm periodicperitonealdialysisinendstagerenaldiseaseisitstillrelevantasinglecenterstudyfromindia |