Cargando…

Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter?

PURPOSE: Contrary to the approved indication for pegfilgrastim prophylaxis, some patients receive it on the same day as the last administration of chemotherapy in clinical practice, which could adversely impact risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). An evaluation of the timing of pegfilgrastim prophylaxi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weycker, Derek, Li, Xiaoyan, Figueredo, Jacqueline, Barron, Rich, Tzivelekis, Spiros, Hagiwara, May
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4805705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26607482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-3036-7
_version_ 1782423188928462848
author Weycker, Derek
Li, Xiaoyan
Figueredo, Jacqueline
Barron, Rich
Tzivelekis, Spiros
Hagiwara, May
author_facet Weycker, Derek
Li, Xiaoyan
Figueredo, Jacqueline
Barron, Rich
Tzivelekis, Spiros
Hagiwara, May
author_sort Weycker, Derek
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Contrary to the approved indication for pegfilgrastim prophylaxis, some patients receive it on the same day as the last administration of chemotherapy in clinical practice, which could adversely impact risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). An evaluation of the timing of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis and FN risk was undertaken. METHODS: A retrospective cohort design and data from two US private health care claims repositories were employed. Study population comprised adults who received intermediate/high-risk chemotherapy regimens for solid tumors or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) and received pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in ≥1 cycle; all cycles with pegfilgrastim were pooled for analyses. Odds ratios (OR) for FN during the cycle were estimated for patients who received pegfilgrastim on the same day (day 1) as the last administration of chemotherapy versus days 2–4 from chemotherapy completion. RESULTS: The study population included 45,592 patients who received pegfilgrastim in 179,152 cycles (n = 37,095 in cycle 1); in 12 % of cycles, patients received pegfilgrastim on the same day as chemotherapy. Odds of FN were higher for patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis on the same day as chemotherapy versus days 2–4 from chemotherapy in cycle 1 (OR = 1.6, 95 % CI = 1.3–1.9, p < 0.001) and all cycles (OR = 1.5, 95 % CI = 1.3–1.6, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this large-scale evaluation of adults who received intermediate/high-risk regimens for solid tumors or NHL in US clinical practice, FN incidence was found to be significantly higher among those who received pegfilgrastim prophylaxis on the same day as chemotherapy completion versus days 2–4 from chemotherapy completion, underscoring the importance of adhering to the indicated administration schedule. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00520-015-3036-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4805705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48057052016-04-09 Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter? Weycker, Derek Li, Xiaoyan Figueredo, Jacqueline Barron, Rich Tzivelekis, Spiros Hagiwara, May Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Contrary to the approved indication for pegfilgrastim prophylaxis, some patients receive it on the same day as the last administration of chemotherapy in clinical practice, which could adversely impact risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). An evaluation of the timing of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis and FN risk was undertaken. METHODS: A retrospective cohort design and data from two US private health care claims repositories were employed. Study population comprised adults who received intermediate/high-risk chemotherapy regimens for solid tumors or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) and received pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in ≥1 cycle; all cycles with pegfilgrastim were pooled for analyses. Odds ratios (OR) for FN during the cycle were estimated for patients who received pegfilgrastim on the same day (day 1) as the last administration of chemotherapy versus days 2–4 from chemotherapy completion. RESULTS: The study population included 45,592 patients who received pegfilgrastim in 179,152 cycles (n = 37,095 in cycle 1); in 12 % of cycles, patients received pegfilgrastim on the same day as chemotherapy. Odds of FN were higher for patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis on the same day as chemotherapy versus days 2–4 from chemotherapy in cycle 1 (OR = 1.6, 95 % CI = 1.3–1.9, p < 0.001) and all cycles (OR = 1.5, 95 % CI = 1.3–1.6, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this large-scale evaluation of adults who received intermediate/high-risk regimens for solid tumors or NHL in US clinical practice, FN incidence was found to be significantly higher among those who received pegfilgrastim prophylaxis on the same day as chemotherapy completion versus days 2–4 from chemotherapy completion, underscoring the importance of adhering to the indicated administration schedule. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00520-015-3036-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-11-25 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4805705/ /pubmed/26607482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-3036-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Weycker, Derek
Li, Xiaoyan
Figueredo, Jacqueline
Barron, Rich
Tzivelekis, Spiros
Hagiwara, May
Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter?
title Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter?
title_full Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter?
title_fullStr Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter?
title_full_unstemmed Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter?
title_short Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter?
title_sort risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4805705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26607482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-3036-7
work_keys_str_mv AT weyckerderek riskofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniaincancerpatientsreceivingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisdoestimingofadministrationmatter
AT lixiaoyan riskofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniaincancerpatientsreceivingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisdoestimingofadministrationmatter
AT figueredojacqueline riskofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniaincancerpatientsreceivingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisdoestimingofadministrationmatter
AT barronrich riskofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniaincancerpatientsreceivingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisdoestimingofadministrationmatter
AT tzivelekisspiros riskofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniaincancerpatientsreceivingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisdoestimingofadministrationmatter
AT hagiwaramay riskofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniaincancerpatientsreceivingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisdoestimingofadministrationmatter