Cargando…
Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter?
PURPOSE: Contrary to the approved indication for pegfilgrastim prophylaxis, some patients receive it on the same day as the last administration of chemotherapy in clinical practice, which could adversely impact risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). An evaluation of the timing of pegfilgrastim prophylaxi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4805705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26607482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-3036-7 |
_version_ | 1782423188928462848 |
---|---|
author | Weycker, Derek Li, Xiaoyan Figueredo, Jacqueline Barron, Rich Tzivelekis, Spiros Hagiwara, May |
author_facet | Weycker, Derek Li, Xiaoyan Figueredo, Jacqueline Barron, Rich Tzivelekis, Spiros Hagiwara, May |
author_sort | Weycker, Derek |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Contrary to the approved indication for pegfilgrastim prophylaxis, some patients receive it on the same day as the last administration of chemotherapy in clinical practice, which could adversely impact risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). An evaluation of the timing of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis and FN risk was undertaken. METHODS: A retrospective cohort design and data from two US private health care claims repositories were employed. Study population comprised adults who received intermediate/high-risk chemotherapy regimens for solid tumors or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) and received pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in ≥1 cycle; all cycles with pegfilgrastim were pooled for analyses. Odds ratios (OR) for FN during the cycle were estimated for patients who received pegfilgrastim on the same day (day 1) as the last administration of chemotherapy versus days 2–4 from chemotherapy completion. RESULTS: The study population included 45,592 patients who received pegfilgrastim in 179,152 cycles (n = 37,095 in cycle 1); in 12 % of cycles, patients received pegfilgrastim on the same day as chemotherapy. Odds of FN were higher for patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis on the same day as chemotherapy versus days 2–4 from chemotherapy in cycle 1 (OR = 1.6, 95 % CI = 1.3–1.9, p < 0.001) and all cycles (OR = 1.5, 95 % CI = 1.3–1.6, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this large-scale evaluation of adults who received intermediate/high-risk regimens for solid tumors or NHL in US clinical practice, FN incidence was found to be significantly higher among those who received pegfilgrastim prophylaxis on the same day as chemotherapy completion versus days 2–4 from chemotherapy completion, underscoring the importance of adhering to the indicated administration schedule. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00520-015-3036-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4805705 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48057052016-04-09 Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter? Weycker, Derek Li, Xiaoyan Figueredo, Jacqueline Barron, Rich Tzivelekis, Spiros Hagiwara, May Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Contrary to the approved indication for pegfilgrastim prophylaxis, some patients receive it on the same day as the last administration of chemotherapy in clinical practice, which could adversely impact risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). An evaluation of the timing of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis and FN risk was undertaken. METHODS: A retrospective cohort design and data from two US private health care claims repositories were employed. Study population comprised adults who received intermediate/high-risk chemotherapy regimens for solid tumors or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) and received pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in ≥1 cycle; all cycles with pegfilgrastim were pooled for analyses. Odds ratios (OR) for FN during the cycle were estimated for patients who received pegfilgrastim on the same day (day 1) as the last administration of chemotherapy versus days 2–4 from chemotherapy completion. RESULTS: The study population included 45,592 patients who received pegfilgrastim in 179,152 cycles (n = 37,095 in cycle 1); in 12 % of cycles, patients received pegfilgrastim on the same day as chemotherapy. Odds of FN were higher for patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis on the same day as chemotherapy versus days 2–4 from chemotherapy in cycle 1 (OR = 1.6, 95 % CI = 1.3–1.9, p < 0.001) and all cycles (OR = 1.5, 95 % CI = 1.3–1.6, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this large-scale evaluation of adults who received intermediate/high-risk regimens for solid tumors or NHL in US clinical practice, FN incidence was found to be significantly higher among those who received pegfilgrastim prophylaxis on the same day as chemotherapy completion versus days 2–4 from chemotherapy completion, underscoring the importance of adhering to the indicated administration schedule. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00520-015-3036-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-11-25 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4805705/ /pubmed/26607482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-3036-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Weycker, Derek Li, Xiaoyan Figueredo, Jacqueline Barron, Rich Tzivelekis, Spiros Hagiwara, May Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter? |
title | Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter? |
title_full | Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter? |
title_fullStr | Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter? |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter? |
title_short | Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter? |
title_sort | risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4805705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26607482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-3036-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weyckerderek riskofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniaincancerpatientsreceivingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisdoestimingofadministrationmatter AT lixiaoyan riskofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniaincancerpatientsreceivingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisdoestimingofadministrationmatter AT figueredojacqueline riskofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniaincancerpatientsreceivingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisdoestimingofadministrationmatter AT barronrich riskofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniaincancerpatientsreceivingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisdoestimingofadministrationmatter AT tzivelekisspiros riskofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniaincancerpatientsreceivingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisdoestimingofadministrationmatter AT hagiwaramay riskofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropeniaincancerpatientsreceivingpegfilgrastimprophylaxisdoestimingofadministrationmatter |